WHEN
FULLY AND CONSISTENTLY APPLIED, THE EXISTING
CURE FOR MEDICALLY CAUSED INVOLUNTARY
ADDICTION
TO PRESCRIPTION DRUGS (CURRENTLY
SUFFERED BY SOME 3
MILLION
N.H.S. PATIENTS),
IS EFFECTIVE IN 70+% OF CASES.
It
is generally known as “Small-Dose Step-Down Managed Withdrawal”,
and is recommended in the authoritative prescribing manual: “British
National Formulary” by both the “British Medical Association”
and the “Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain”.
Whilst
such involuntary addiction to prescribed drugs costs the N.H.S.
nearly £3.65 BILLION POUNDS per year (approaching £10 Million A
DAY), it is unfortunate that this MOST OFTEN
EFFECTIVE addiction recovery procedure IS SELDOM IF
EVER IMPLEMENTED - for two main reasons:
1) The
absence of a formally constituted, staffed and funded “Department
of Addiction Recovery Management”,
able to
daily deliver,
monitor and
administer
the necessary dosages
to individual
involuntarily
addicted
patients at
their personal
residences and / or
in residential
care and nursing homes,
and,
2
) The unjustified, selfish and cruel reluctance (for turnover
preservation purposes) of pharmaceutical companies to regularly
and widely offer, manufacture or stock the ranges of “small-dose”
units of their addictive drugs essential to the success of such an
effective withdrawal procedure.
Whilst
it might be difficult to conceive that pharmaceutical company's
decades of making grants to medical universities, colleges and
teaching hospitals was done deliberately in order to create huge
numbers of multi-daily prescription dependent state supported
addicts, THAT IS NEVERTHELESS WHAT HAS OCCURRED.
And
the real absurdity is that the cost of establishing, running and
supplying a government “Department of Addiction Recovery
Management” would be more than recovered from the National
Health Service's DAILY £10 Million of current spending on keeping
three million patients in miserable, non-productive zombie-like
involuntary addiction !
HERE'S
HOW INVOLUNTARY ADDICTION TO PRESCRIPTION DRUGS WAS STARTED, AND
CONTINUES TO EXPAND PATIENT BY PATIENT.
The
recent demise of John D. Rockefeller does not unfortunately bring to
an end probably the biggest and boldest confidence trick ever played
(together with the Carnegie Institute) on humanity, the medical
profession and national governments.
In
the United States of America, up to 1910, the study and practice of
medicine left much to be desired. Some medical qualifications could
be obtained via dubious correspondence courses, and many others could
be secured with minimum training at short staffed and inadequately
qualified medical colleges.
As
a result, medicine generally was labouring under an increasingly bad
reputation, and the American Medical Association was becoming more
and more concerned.
It
therefore created a “Council on Medical Education” in
order to examine the status of medical training throughout the U.S.
and to make proposals for improving not only health education, but
also medical practitioner's professional reputations.
However,
by 1908, as a result of council member differences and financial
poverty, the whole A.M.A. rejuvenation process was grinding to a
halt, and it was into this vacuum that the Carnegie / Rockefeller
consortium entered with immaculate timing and a superbly simple plan.
The wealthy Carnegie Institute along with the equally rich
Rockefeller family essentially represented America's largest chemical
combine, and in December of 1908, the Carnegie Institutes’s
President offered to take over the whole A.M.A's failed training
improvement programme.
To
confirm the fact that the new Rockefeller / Carnegie “Foundation”
was an impartial body separate from the A.M.A., it was agreed that
the Foundation would have “carte blanche” to operate and publish
quite independently and without further reference to the A.M.A.
Council on Medical Education.
The
Rockefeller / Carnegie Foundation immediately began to lavish cash
“grants” (eventually amounting in total to hundreds of millions
of dollars) on those medical schools, colleges, universities and
teaching hospitals which were willing to accept some quite
significant control of their training curricula.
As
a result, by 1910 the Foundation had effectively invested over a
Billion dollars in the 80 or so medical schools which had proved
willing to accept Foundation influence and control, and by 1927, some
80 other uncooperative schools had fallen by the wayside mainly
because of lack of funding, and the lack of prestige which funding
brings.
The
net result of all this manipulation was that THE UNITED STATES
“OFFICIAL” MEDICAL BASIS WAS CONVERTED OVERWHELMINGLY TO
ALLOPATHIC AND / OR PALLIATIVE MEDICAL PRACTICE.
An
allopathic physician essentially “cures” by suppressing symptoms.
He
or she does not seek to handle the cause of pain or trauma,
but prescribes a painkiller or other drug. And palliative medicine
is also the practice of “treating symptoms” rather than taking
the time or making the effort to look for the cause of any symptoms.
This
essentially rules out diagnostic investigations of DIETARY
DEFICIENCIES AND EXCESSES, ALLERGIES, BROKEN INJURED OR DISEASED
ORGANS OR BODY PARTS, POISONINGS, natural healing and various other
possibilities.
When
Allopathic and Palliative Medicine appear to “heal”, any such
improvement occurs only because Mankind is born with self-healing
bodies and minds, and all that the medication has done, in most
cases, is to make the symptoms more confrontable by suppressing the
body's pain messages.
Unfortunately,
pain messages also have useful
purposes, which also get suppressed.
Furthermore,
many of the prescriptions quickly written today are not just for
physical “treatment”, but also for so-called emotional and mental
disorders, and, an escalating number of them are for addictive
substances which can, in a relatively short time, develop dependency
in the patient PLUS involuntary addiction - effectively for life –
if not specifically handled with a programme dedicated to
withdrawal and cure.
Which
brings us back to the undeniable fact that effective addiction
recovery procedures are seldom if ever implemented under the
Allopathic / Palliative medical regimes overwhelmingly practised
today by the U.K. N.H.S.
Regimes
deliberately put in place by the international chemical industry to
develop their pharmaceutical sector into the biggest, most profitable
and expanding provider of investment opportunities for ruthless
businessmen and psychiatrists who show no remorse for, and offer no
help to, millions of U.K. citizens locked in deliberate addiction for
the sake of bigger turnover, profit, dividends, salaries, fees and
bonuses.
And
the beauty of their conniving and manipulation IS that that extra
profit, dividends, bigger salaries, fees and bonuses are all paid for
by U.K. Taxpayers !
But
the sad thing IS that politicians of all parties have allowed
themselves to be drawn into this raping of taxpayers and patients,
because the “democratic” system under which they govern does not
allow someone with the sort of none palliative expert
professional knowledge held by the writer of this article and other
natural healing medical experts, to brief them on matters outside
Ministers', other MPs' and Civil Servants' limited knowledge and
experience.
Matters
which are gnawing away at the very foundations of that democratic
system.
Authoritative
U.S. medical observer & author Edward Griffin summarised the
results of the Rockefeller / Carnegie Foundation's “grant
generosity” as follows:
“And
so it has come to pass that the teaching staff of all our medical
schools have become a very special breed. In
the selection and training process, heavy emphasis always has been
put on finding individuals who, because of temperament or special
interest, have been attracted by the field of . . . . research into
pharmacology.
This
has resulted in loading the staffs of our medical schools with men
and women who, by preference and by training, are ideal propagators
of the drug orientated science that has come to dominate American
(and now
also world)
medicine.
And
the irony of it is that neither they nor their students are even
remotely aware that they are products of a rigid selection process
geared to hidden commercial objectives.
So
thorough is their insulation from this fact that, even when exposed
to the obvious truth, very few are capable of accepting it, for to do
so would be a tremendous blow to their professional pride. Generally
speaking, the deeper one is drawn into the medical profession, the
more years he has been exposed to its regimens, the more difficult it
is to break out of its confines.
In
practical terms, this simply means that your doctor probably will be
the last person on your Christmas card list to accept the facts
presented in this study.”
Dr
David L. Edsall was at one time the Dean of the Harvard Medical
School.
The
conditions he describes at Harvard are the same as those at every
other medical school in America.
“I
was for a period, a professor of therapeutics and pharmacology, and I
knew from experience that students were obliged then by me and by
others to learn about an interminable number of drugs, many of which
were valueless, many of them useless, some probably even harmful
. . . Almost all subjects must be taken at exactly the same time,
and in almost exactly in the same way by all students, and the amount
introduced into each course is such that few students have time or
energy to explore any subject in a spirit of independent interest .
A
little comparison shows that there is less intellectual
freedom in the medical courses than in
almost any other form of professional education in this country.”
At
another point in time Edward Griffin stated:
“Yes,
he who pays the piper does call the tune.
It
may not be humanly possible for those who finance the medical schools
to determine what is taught in every minute detail. But such is not
necessary to achieve the cartel's desired goals.
One
can be sure, however, that there is total control over what is NOT
taught, and that, under no
circumstances will even one of Rockefeller's shiny dimes
ever go to a medical college, to a hospital, to a teaching staff or
to a researcher that
holds the
“unorthodox” view that the best medicine is in nature!
In
the meantime, whilst doctors are forced to spend hundreds of hours
studying the names and actions of all kinds of man-made drugs, they
are lucky if they receive even a portion of a single course on basic
nutrition. Many have none at
all.
The result is that the
average doctor's wife or secretary knows more about practical
nutrition that he does”.
Due to most medical doctor's
now “orthodox” single-minded palliative training, a question
about “WHAT DEFICIENCY CAUSES IT?” wouldn't even cross his or her
mind - because they have been comprehensively trained to think
otherwise.
Dr
Gabor Lenkei M.D. the famous Hungarian author of: “Censored Health”
- “ON THE ASSEMBLY LINE OF THE DISEASE INDUSTRY”, wrote:
“These are serious
accusations, but nonetheless true. It is even harder to read such
lines as a medical doctor. It also took me months to come to terms
with the truth. It wasn't easy to accept that I had been blind.
And at the time I wasn't even making a living from my medical
practice.
The
realisation that I had been taken for a fool shocked me. I had
unwittingly become a summa cum laude (graduated with highest honours)
agent for the pharmaceutical industry.
As a student, I had naively
dived into medicine. I wanted to heal people. I accepted without
reservation that whatever I was taught was the best possible way of
healing, the best possible recipe for success.
It didn't even cross my
mind that some other procedures might exist that could produce better
results. After all, what I studied was medicine – wasn't it ?
Later I started to have doubts. I realised they had only shown me
one side of the coin, and left me ignorant about things I should
have known.”
As a preamble to the way in
which, over the last century, medicine has changed
throughout the western world, Dr Paul
Starr authored a fascinating book called: “Social
Transformation of American Medicine“, about how the
profession which is intended to be dedicated to healing has gradually
turned into a lucrative mainly pharmaceutical business, with
commercial goals superseding by far those detailed in the Hippocratic
oath and intended to be practised in G.P's consulting rooms and
surgeries.
He gives a clear explanation
of how, during their training and internship years, the practice of
healing was taken away from medical doctors who thus became mere
tools in the hands of greedy chemical manufacturers and financially
orientated psychiatrists.
Readers
of Starr's book can see the step by step process of transformation,
and a medical culture that has coined more and more money and
produced less and less health. Studying
the book, allows us to find out why healing activities get
contaminated with corruption and a thirst for money, and
how physicians were misled and betrayed, simply by telling them only
one side of the healing story.
Griffin
also holds
no grudge against mistaught
medical professionals and
states:
“Drug
houses bombard the market with so many new drugs each year, that the
physician often does not know how effective are the drugs he
prescribes. All he knows
is that he has seen them advertised in the A.M.A. (or
B.M.A.)
Journal, has been handed a
“fact sheet” by a
“detail man” representing the company which manufactures the
drugs, and may have had some limited or qualified
success with them on a few of his previous patients.
Because he is a
practitioner – not a researcher – he cannot conduct controlled
experiments to determine the relative effectiveness of the new drugs
as compared to the old or with similar drugs available through
another drug firm. All he knows is that “they seem to help some of
his patients”. If the first drug prescribed does not bring about
the desired results, then he will issue a new prescription and “try
something else”.
(And his parting comment to
his patient regularly echoes that of drug-pushers of illicit drugs
around the world: “See how you get on with this”.)
“Of
course, there is nothing about this procedure which is improper from
the physician's point of view. He is doing only what he
can to help his patients by making available to them what
he has been told is the latest technology in the field of
drugs. Remember, it is not he who makes a profit from writing the
prescription.
There is no questioning the
fact that the doctor serves as an extremely effective salesman for a
multi-billion dollar drug industry, but he is not paid (by
the pharmaceutical industry) for this vital service.
He
has been trained for it however. Through
the curricula within the world's leading medical schools, students
are exposed to such an extensive training in the use of drugs (and
practically none in the field of nutrition, allergies, fasting and
natural health, etc.) that, upon graduation, they quite naturally
turn to the use of drugs as the 'professional
treatment of choice' for
practically all of Man's ills.”
Nutritional deficiencies,
excesses and allergies, fasting and natural health, etc., are just
not considered by them. Because nobody ever taught them these
things !
What
the founders of the Rockefeller empire had recognised was that,
whilst both “physical fitness” and “mental health” are some
of the most precious assets for 99% of the population, these subjects
are essentially a mystery to that same majority of the world's
population, who
are therefore
to
a major degree - gullible.
Thus,
and especially because of
the addictive properties
of many drugs, they saw
prescribing as ripe for
massive low cost, long term exploitation, ESPECIALLY within a
National Health Service financed by a country's Taxpayers
!
QUITE UNBELIEVABLE REALLY
!
And
it is this “unbelievable factor”
which
has
made the build-up of all forms of drug addiction, psychiatric mental
health labelling and the financial crippling and
controlling of
the U.K's
N.H.S. a devastating fact of life.
It
is not only today's doctors, G.Ps, physicians and independent
high street chemists
who have been sucked into this lie. It is also the guardians of
democracy – our Ministers,
M.Ps and Civil Servants who have been sucked in by the greatest Press
and Public Relations
machine in the world today.
An
earlier master of “P.R.” - Goebbels,
the Nazi Minister of Propaganda, apparently
once
said:-
If
I tell
a lie once,
ten people will believe it.
If
I tell
it twice,
a hundred persons will believe it.
If I say it three times it
will be accepted by a thousand, and,
If
I repeat
it
four times, even I start to believe it.
What
the psycho-pharmaceutical fraternity have so successfully added to
the above to
bring pressure on our country' decision-makers are
promotional flattery, bribery and blackmail of every conceivable
type.
PLUS,
in respect of any
competition, alternative or
other healing solutions,
they
have widely and continuously used devastating
overt, covert, direct and indirect, attacks, criticisms, denials,
ridicule, black-balling, side-lining, constant
derision, secret political onslaughts
and destructive
marginalisation to
viciously and falsely discredit them.
And to make sure that those of
our political decision-makers, who have previously supported them,
will be reluctant to change their minds, the psycho-pharmaceutical
manipulators of our economy, our society and our budgets have even
managed to build-in a truly inspired “loss of face”
factor.
In
the same way that a majority of physicians
are extremely reluctant to
admit they “might have been short-changed or conned
during their training years”,
politicians, seeking to impress the electorate and their party
leaders, are understandably
even more reluctant to admit
they “might just perhaps”
have been manipulated on an
even grander scale than the medical profession and our Taxpayers.
So
whilst this briefing concerns itself with “Actually
Curing Involuntary
Addiction to Prescribed
Drugs”,
that cure
is technically and logistically a relatively simple task compared
with rescuing
our politicians
from the controlled condition it has taken Rockefeller &
Co a century and countless
billions of dollars to bring
them to.
But it can be done, given
the full, frank and proper informing of persons senior enough in our
decision-making hierarchy to be above blaming themselves for being
outwitted by determined, calculating, cold-hearted, selfish, lying
manipulators, who don't care if they destroy other peoples' careers
and lives in order to further their own vast fortunes.
And
because involuntary
addiction
to prescription
drugs
is such a massive drain on
the Exchequer, by starting to
cure it, politicians will soon
start to save enough money to
be able to comfortably afford
to cure it.
In other words, by so
blatantly building a confidence swindle so massively expensive for
the Government and the economy, the psycho-pharms have at the same
time provided Government with a source of cost-saving capable of
giving Britain the funds it now needs to successfully see an
addiction free society through to fruition.
WHAT SUCCESS ?
A relatively drug-free
society, with MILLIONS of patients released from cold-turkey control
and misery, and a Government released from massive N.H.S. addiction
wasted expenditure.
An educated Government
which is no longer being conned into converting Drug-Baron created
addicts into even more taxpayer supplied and funded lifelong
prescription addicts.
But
don't just take my word for it. Go to the Internet and look up: Dr.
Michael Colgan, Adelle Davis, Dianetics,
Edward G. Griffin, Albert
Szent-Gyorgyi, Dr. Gabor Lenkie MD, Linus Carl Pauling, Dr. Matthias
Rath, Dr.
Thomas Szasz, The Citizen's Commission on Human Rights and the
numerous world writers on “Natural Health”, scientific
laboratory health-testing, diagnoses of causes, the origin and causes
of allergies and the truth about psycho-somatic influences.
But,
Here Comes The Important Bit !
HOW
TO NOW ACTUALLY START
IMPLEMENTING AN EFFECTIVE CURE FOR INVOLUNTARY ADDICTION TO
PRE$CRIBED MEDICAL DRUGS.
From
the above, it will be seen that the real problem in regard to helping
the millions of involuntary addicts quit their habit and avoid the
side-effects of their “medication” is
the fact that the pharmaceutical industry (which is well
equipped to sponsor and help gradual withdrawal procedures) is
the very same commercial operation which has as its main
goal the procurement of increasing usage of as many of
their addictive products as possible by an increasing number of
people.
Consequently,
so-called “self-regulation” by the psycho-pharms is never ever
going to produce a better result than the time wasting
“medication-sustaining” lip-service to which politicians have
been subjected by the psycho-pharms over the last 69 years.
These
manipulative ploys have included, amongst others:
a) the whole
countrywide 65 years of “never-ever-intended-to-cure”
Opioid Substitution Therapy (methadone, etc.),
b) the 5 years
incestuous “National Treatment Outcome Research Study” of
psychiatric “treatments” - CONDUCTED SOLELY BY
PSYCHIATRISTS THEMSELVES WITHOUT final useful report of
the huge level of failure of such psychiatric “so-called
treatment” results or “outcomes” -
and,
c) the recent failed 4
year psychiatric “piloting” of “Payment by Results” in the
drug recovery sector, which has deliberately aborted
implementation of that brilliant current Drugs Strategy, because
treatment with drugs cannot and does not
cure !
As
a result of these persistent psycho-pharm efforts to avoid any
reduction in the increasingly vast numbers of U.K. citizen’s
addicted to their products, it is vital that “Reduction of
Involuntary Addiction” is (for obvious reasons) conducted as a
totally separate government initiative which does NOT
involve psychiatrists and only peripherally involves pharmacists –
under tight regulation.
Proposals
are set out in the next pages for the formation by the Government of:
Addiction
Withdrawal
Advisory
Services
& Help
(“AWASH”)
a
special national & local recovery department for involuntarily
addicted patients - independent of psychiatry and
pharmacology.
Obviously
3 million involuntary addicts who stop taking an average of over
1,095 expensive medical drug doses a year will create a cash saving
more than enough to pay for the whole AWASH scheme and for further
N.H.S economies.
HOW
TO ESCAPE FROM THE U.K’S PRESENT MASSIVELY EXCESSIVE OVER-USAGE OF
ADDICTIVE PRESCRIPTION AND OTHER DRUGS:
After
issuing the order to “Stop Engines”, because the inertia is so
great, it takes several miles of further travel for a Captain to
bring a modern oil super-tanker to a full stop.
And
over the last 60 plus years of “patient management” by
long-term prescription medication, the pharmaceutical companies,
and their psychiatric and medical marketing arms have developed the
pill-popping treatments of our NHS into a nearly unstoppable “health
service” methodology, whereby just stopping the prescribing of any
drug to the hundreds of thousands and even millions of its present
users has been deliberately calculated to cause chaotic protest, and
thus preserve their turnover.
BUT,
the definition of an “EFFECTIVE” drugs policy is one which
continuously moves
a society or community in
the direction of
total abstinence - i.e. it is not a society totally without drugs,
but is a society whose policy is to continuously move our communities
towards
becoming a society free of ADDICTIVE drugs.
And
the action needed to progress towards that is NOT just to stop dead
all the current prescribing of existing patients under such
management ‘treatment’.
There
are three main steps:
1) STOP
EXPANDING THE CURRENT LIST OF PATIENTS BEING PRESCRIBED SUCH
SUBSTANCES IN RESPECT ONLY OF SYMPTOMS.
i.e.
allow no new consumers of such substances to be prescribed
by any doctors, psychiatrists or other physicians UNTIL laboratory
and other testing plus full cause diagnosis has been done and
sufficient time for any initial physical or mental trauma has
elapsed, to permit the natural healing processes to start
taking effect.
Depending
on the nature of their patent’s trauma this will likely be a
non-prescribing period of from 2 to 4 weeks.
2) Establish
Residential Addiction Recovery AWASH Training Centres
in each local county area, so that AWASH Recovery Workers who
will Manage known existing addicted PATIENTS of all types
(i.e. those currently addicted to licensed AND prescription
drugs) may be trained in already proven effective self-help
addiction recovery technology.
3) Expand the residential
and training facilities at the centres established at
2) above, so that they
may also accept for training and self-help curing on a Payment
by Results basis those
addicts seeking help to escape from addiction to illicit drugs
and alcohol on a self or family funded basis.
The
training for the above steps has been successfully practised since
1966 and is now available at scores of centres in 49 countries,
offering training for recovery from all forms of substance addiction.
70
to 75% of addicts of all types are ready and able to quit their drugs
habit, and are so willing that the vast majority of them have already
tried to quit hundreds of times (often daily), and although having
failed on every occasion, still want to try again.
Their
problem is therefore not intention. It is that they just don’t
know HOW TO, which is why effective and proven addiction
recovery training is their salvation.
For
users of “street” drugs this is delivered in 13 weeks on a
residential programme, and normally shows a 60 to 69+% success rate
first time through with (out of those who failed) up to 5 to
20% more succeeding on a second shorter refresher course.
(In
a few cases, where there are domestic and family circumstances
which permit it, the same technology in respect of the initial
withdrawal procedures can be applied with interventionist assistance
to an addict by his or her family at their home.)
Which
brings us back to the main N.H.S. patient addiction recovery problem
mentioned on the previous pages. It is the “main problem”
because for every individual addicted to illegal street drugs, there
are a dozen people involuntarily addicted to legally prescribed
pharmaceutical drugs - paid for by taxpayers - and their legal
addiction can sometimes be even more devastating, life spoiling and
controlling than criminal addiction to most of the illegal drugs.
Whilst
the total cost to the Exchequer of providing and delivering 3 to 4
doses a day of those drugs to which patients have become
involuntarily addicted is certainly higher - for the following
costing example we have calculated only a mere £1.00 per dose and
only 3 doses a day. i.e. a minimum cost of £1,095 per year per
patient, which includes not only the drugs but also their prescribing
and dispensing, etc.
On
the other hand, 2 to 3 months (max 13 weeks) of an average of twice a
week 45 minute visits by a trained and licensed AWASH Recovery Worker
- managing a client list of twenty recovering addicts - is going to
cost well under £500 per cured addict on a once only basis,
even if the AWASH Worker follows up on a once a month basis for up to
six months after the patient is cured.
With:
a)
an annual total cost for each AWASH Recovery Worker of maximum
£40,000,
b)
a current U.K. involuntarily addicted client list of some millions,
and with
c)
each AWASH Worker creating savings of over £47,600 per year
by
d)
each withdrawing 80 clients a year, we would need 2,000 trained AWASH
Workers to cure the present list of addicts in 19 years. (That's
how serious the problem is !)
Whilst
doing this, those 2,000 AWASH Workers would together save the U.K.
Tax-payers an
ADDITIONAL £15.2 MILLION per year over and
above their own AWASH costs, so that in the whole 19 years (assuming
no new patients become involuntarily addicted) there would be an
EXTRA saving of over £288.8 MILLION.
In
other words, the indicated AWASH “involuntarily addicted recovery
programme”, whilst curing N.H.S. patients, will not only pay the
full cost of running its own department and programme, but will also
make a healthy annual contribution to the N.H.S. and Chancellor of
the Exchequer’s treasury for other anti-addiction purposes.
HOW MANY OTHER STATE
SPONSORED INITIATIVES CAN DO THAT ?
AND LOOK HOW LITTLE IS THE
LEGISLATION REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE IT:
All
that is needed is for the Government to rule that addictive or other
dependency developing pharmaceutical drugs will only be licensed for
production in the manufacturer's recommended dosages, so long as (in
order to make step-down withdrawal possible) they also
produce and deliver FREE OF CHARGE at least another 5 small dosage
sizes equivalent to the following percentages of their recommended
doses:
1%, 2.5%, 5%, 10% and 20%.
These
apply to pills, tablets, powder and liquid capsules and other liquid
doses.
If
pharmaceutical producers also wished to help further by providing
“charge-able” dose sizes of 30%, 40% and 50%, this would
obviously make precisely measured step-down withdrawal prescription
writing even simpler and quicker.
BUT,
HAVE NO DOUBT ABOUT IT !
Without
wide and low cost availability of these small doses, the curing of
pharmaceutically caused involuntary addiction will go on being
totally frustrated at increasingly massive cost to our whole society
and our economy.
SO
. . . . ISN’T THE ABOVE WORTH FURTHER INVESTIGATING ?
To Find
Out More About How To Actually Cure
Involuntary
and Other Addiction
Phone:
(01342) 811099, or E-mail: keneck@btinternet.com
PLEASE
RECOGNISE:
No-One
Can Ever Become Addicted To A Drug Or To Medication They Never Take.
BECAUSE IT IS THE DRUG
ITSELF WHICH CAUSES ADDICTION.
And please remember, we
take drugs only because we are wrongly advised
or wrongly believe that
they will solve a problem !
______________________________________________
This report has been
prepared by:
S.A.F.E.
the
Society
for an Addiction
Free
Existence
______________________________________________
