SOCIETY for an ADDICTION FREE EUROPE (SAFE) in association with ADDICTION RECOVERY TRAINING SERVICES (ARTS) (self-help recovery training for voluntary and O.S.T. addicts) and ADDICTION WITHDRAWAL ADVISORY SERVICES & HELP (AWASH) (helping involuntarily addicted patients to recover from their drug medication)
“Social Care” is all
about people. So it is not unreasonable to expect that those
officials and professionals mainly in charge of our Social Care
Services should be rather expert on the subject of “human beings”.
WHAT DO WE FIND ?
We find that Social Services
of all kinds provide a workplace (or some say playground)
for a whole range of “graduates” trained in or influenced by
strange psychiatric definitions of human beings and weird
interpretations of human behaviour.
In addition to psychiatrists
themselves, these “graduates” include psychologists,
psycho-therapists, psycho-analysts, social scientists and
sociologists as well as social workers, etc., and because the word
“psyche” means “mind” or “spirit”, you would expect
psychology and psychiatry to be the experts on the human mind.
ONCE AGAIN: WHAT DO WE FIND ?
In Psychology's Dr. Chris
Evans' authoritative “Dictionary of the Mind, Brain and Behaviour”
(ISBN 0 09 918070 7), the definition for “mind” ends with:
“Whilst few psychologists
think of “mind” as a spiritual entity separable from the brain
and body, most now accept that the richness and reality of mental
life cannot be denied, and that a place must be found for the
word “mind” in comprehensive theories of human
Obviously the “word” MIND
has got to be acknowledged by one's profession when your profession
is named “psyche-something”, which means “mind” (or
But what about a definition
for “mind” ?
What about a description of
What about the “mind's”
What about the structure or
anatomy of the “mind” ?
What about the two different
sorts of “minds” all human being's possess ?
What about the function of
each of these “minds” ?
What about how to safely
access “the mind”?
What about how “the mind”
can become irrational, and why ?
And what about how “the
mind” can be recovered to sanity, etc. ?
Wouldn't the above vital
information be slightly more important than merely “finding a
'place' in “theories” for the word “mind” ?
WHEN WE LOOK UP “PSYCHIATRY”: WHAT DO WE FIND ?
That authoritative Psychology
dictionary definition for “psychiatry” finishes with:
trouble with psychiatry today is that it is still without a working
theory, not just of the mind but also the disturbed mind.
a definition of 'mental illness' is not easy to come by, so perhaps
it is not surprising that to this date psychiatric methods have
inevitably been of a hit or miss variety.”
In searching the wide range of
mainly divergent and contradictory arguments and definitions in
“psych” written manuals and training materials from the various
mainly opposing psych “schools of thought”, one finds NO agreed
upon definition for “MIND” and, in fact, there is a near
comprehensive denial of the mind's existence.
this means that it is those “psych” professions which control our
Social Care Services which deny the very existence of what gives us our human
superiority over the animal world by denying the existence of our
“psyche” - i.e. OUR ANALYTICAL MIND AND OUR SPIRIT (or “soul”).
As a result, the psycho-social
“care-world” has closely allied itself with the commercial world
of pharmaceutical medication, monthly feeding billions of £pounds
worth of addictive drugs into millions of social care patients -
mainly to keep them “resting quietly” at British taxpayer
expense, whilst providing well paid jobs for the psych practitioners
and provably huge profits for the drug companies.
So, instead of being able to
continue living in their own homes or amongst their own families,
increasing numbers of our elderly (and others) (NOW NEARLY THREE MILLION) have
become involuntarily addicted prescription junkies in local nursing
homes who employ mainly low-paid so-called “nursing staff” from
third-world countries who are content to have employment in a
civilised country, even though their job is only to make sure that
their client/patients “take their three times a day drugs” and
get clean bedding when their drug intake upsets their stomachs.
Anyone who regularly follows
the national and local media headlines soon becomes aware that the
above are not the only examples of failing social care and failing
psychiatric versions of so-called mental health “treatments” -
which are always coupled with appeals for more and more money to
spend on residential accommodation and especially prescription drugs.
WHEN will Ministers, M.Ps,
Officials and even the Royal family begin to recognise that they are
– in a majority of cases - being taken for a ride by the “Mental
Health” and “Social Care” industries – particularly in
respect of prescription medication and addictive drugs. And when
will the British public themselves begin to realise that they also
are being misled and damaged by food and drink producers and
over-the-counter medicine advertisements and promotions.
All of which can lead to an
increased demand for “CARE”, much of which can be avoided or
prevented by “care” full living, PLUS properly founded CARE of
those who are in need of real advice and attention from doctors.
Doctors and G.Ps who are regrettably more concerned with the
palliative, symptom-handling, time-saving prescription writing they
have been taught, sponsored by the cash grants which pharmaceutical
companies make to doctor's medical training institutions.
so many other aspects of modern living, addictive drugs and
misinformation on them, underlie any problems in those areas.
But unfortunately national and
local governments and health service chiefs have failed so often in
the last 68 years because the professional so-called experts advising
them on health and care are in fact professional con-artists
concerned only with position, power and profit.
you would like to know more about the real underlying causes of our
currently increasing SOCIAL CARE SERVICE failures and how they may be
improved whilst saving huge amounts of taxpayer monies, please feel
free to call (01342) 810151 or 811099 most days between 11.00am and
9.00pm to ask questions and to review what can be done to improve
for an ADDICTION
Seeking To Avoid Dementia and
Other Psycho-Pharm Prompted Problems.
As long as psychiatrists,
neurologists and pharmacologists continue to hold on to the false
idea that the “brain” is the repository of the “psyche”
(which means “soul” or “mind”), they will continue to seek
more and more money instead of seeking truly “brighter minds” WHO
ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT THE HUMAN MIND AND THE
SPIRITUAL LIFE FORCE BEHIND IT ARE, and
where and how to access and help both those
Hopefully, they will
eventually recognise that, whilst other flesh and blood animals have
brains – animals do not have the minds of Man, and that it is Man's
mind which is the victim of Dementia – not his brain.
is because brains are NOT beings but, in both animals and Man, are
nothing more nor less than an extremely efficient electronic
SWITCHBOARD designed to provide an interface between the Being (or person) and the Beings minds and body.
Why “minds”? Because, whilst animals and Man both possess “Reactive minds”,
it is Man alone who also possesses an “Analytical mind” which
makes him master of the majority of other lifeforms on Earth, and it
is the increasingly prolonged take-over of that Analytical Mind by
his Reactive Mind which is the cause of Dementia.
It will therefore be seen
that, until medical research into Dementia recognises the existence
of the Spiritual Being and both the Analytical and the Reactive minds
and their functions, then that research can make no progress into
preventing Dementia, because it is in the relationship between both
those minds (about which psychiatry has yet to become
aware) that the cause of Dementia is to be found.
Already completed and 66 year
research into our minds by philosopher, humanitarian and scientist L.
reveals that, whilst the Analytical mind is concerned with Man's
goals, direction, eternal life and his physical attributes, the
Reactive mind is concerned solely and only with the preservation and
protection of the human body which Man's Spiritual Self (or soul) has
chosen to use for his activities in the physical universe.
And whilst the Analytical mind
with its three main abilities of “identification”, “comparison”
and “differentiation” is vastly superior to the Reactive mind's
single ability “to identify”, because of the over-riding need
to keep the body aliveto serve the
purposes of both analytical AND reactive considerations, nature
has given the Reactive mind the power (in what may appear to that
mind to be bodily threatening or damaging circumstances) to
shut-down the Analytical mind (full or partial
unconsciousness) whilst implementing a purely reactive
earlier experience-based endeavour to preserve and protect the body
from physical harm.
Furthermore, during the time
the Analytical mind is shut down, so also is the will of the
Spiritual Being (or soul) which is using that body for its present
The job of the Reactive mind
is to be aware of and react to damage and / or real and apparent
threats to the body in the form of impact, injury, burns, scalding,
breaking, stabbing, bruising and poisoning or doping, etc., etc.,
with the purpose of not only acting immediately to alleviate the
current damaging or threatening situation, but also in order to build up a permanent record
intended to provide a rapid stimulus-response reaction to future
similarly threatening circumstances.
So, because the Analytical
Mind is shut-down during such Reactive incidents, every painful,
poisoning and physically threatening event is recorded ONLY in the
Reactive mind and not in the Analytical mind, and so is not normally
known to the Analytical mind OR to the Spiritual Being who possesses
and is running that body.
Furthermore, it will be seen
that, with physical threats, injuries, poisoning and pain a constant
part of every day life on Earth, the size of the Reactive store of memories of
such incidents fundamentally can ONLY grow and grow and grow, leading
to increasing control of a person's life by his or her very often
irrational animal originated Reactive mind, instead of by his
or her highly sane and extremely rational exclusively human
A young person with only a minor
store of earleir physical injury content in his or her Reactive mind, operates mainly via his or her
rational Analytical mind. But an older person, with a far greater
number of painful, threatening and depressing incidents in his or her
life, INCREASINGLY operates out of the earlier recorded physical
protection computations stored in his or her Reactive mind, which
will too often be inapplicable to current present time circumstances,
and which will thus appear strange, weird or even totally absurd to
their family, friends and colleagues.
If recognised early enough, or
if anticipated from Dianetic research, knowledge and
study of the Reactive mind and its effect on Man's behaviour in
general, deterioration into Dementia can be prevented by learning
how to empty or “clear” the Reactive mind, and so also avoid the
increasing expansion of its contents and its malevolent effect on a
person's later life.
Dianetic “clearing” has been possible since the 1950s and today is
available from qualified practitioners around the U.K. and the rest of the world, and you can obtain a local practitioner's contact details by
phoning (01342) 810151 or 811099, practically any time between
11.00am and 9,00pm on most weekdays.
There is however also
something helpful you can start to do immediately.
Obviously, avoid hurting
or poisoning yourself in even the most minor ways. But if you do, also avoid excess
usage of so-called “painkillers” for two important reasons:
After an injury, pain is a message from a damaged body-part reporting
and / or the threat of too much not
yet appropriate stress
on that injured
is because painkillers also stop
healing actions from easily communicating
with, and thus speeding the healing of, thatinjured
Especially avoid the usage or ingestion of any
substances known to be basically toxic, even if only mildly so,
as they constitute another threat to the body's comfortable survival.
This includes avoiding not only alcohol, but also all forms of
may be prescribed by your local G.P.
is because it is increasingly apparent that the U.K's four million
drug addicts (of
million are involuntarily addicted to prescription drugs)
are amongst the most hopeless and
rapidly deteriorating Dementia cases.
you were taking toxins or poisons like Diazepam (Valium) or any of the other
Benzodiazepines three times a day every day, and suffering “cold
turkey” withdrawal symptoms whenever you tried
to withdraw from their usage, wouldn't you begin to suspect that
there might also
other collateral damage being done to your body and your life ?
the answer to your suspicions is: YES – drugs of all types are a
prime factor in speeding up the onset of Dementia, and there are
three times as
many people addicted to legally
over-the-counter pharmaceutical drugs as
there are addicted to criminal and smuggled illegal drugs.
paid for by U.K. taxpayers
financial burden on the N.H.S., as
addictive drugs seldom if
ever cure anything -
cost all of us -
richest in the whole
current most damaging barriers to, or brakes
on, the development of the human race arethe
ADDICTIONSwhich disable millions.
Mainly addiction to substances
such as chemical drugs and alcoholic drink
(which of course is also an
whilst trillions of £Pounds, $Dollars and €uros and billions of
man hours have been spent by nations around the world on the
so-called “treatment” of drug addiction, since 1948 the size of
the world's substance addicted population has continued relentlessly
to increase, and the psychiatric profession, which is overwhelmingly
responsible for delivery of such treatments, continues to repeat the
lie that: “Addiction Is
WHY? Because psychiatric prescription treatment methods
are themselves fundamentally INCAPABLE of curing
substance addiction, a fact which the pseudo-science of
psychiatry and its pharmaceutical partners in “drug treatment
methodology” continuously endeavour to withhold from the political
decision-makers of the world as well as from the general public and
news media - for no reason other than their own
strictly commercial profit ambitions.
a world basis, the psycho-pharms not only currently make £TRILLIONS
out of prescribing addictive pharmaceutical drugs to “manage” an
ever expanding invented series of so-called “mental illnesses”,
they make further £BILLIONS out of pretending that they can “handle”
the world's “Dementia” and “Depression” problems by
expensively feeding multi-daily supplies of addictive pharmaceutical
prescription drugs to N.H.S. patients, and also pretend to “manage”
our drug and drink addicts with even more daily supplies of addictive
psycho-pharmaceutical prescription drugs - ALL PAID FOR BY U.K.
understand the truth, it is necessary to first recognise the absolute
and unavoidable fact that: NO ONE CAN EVER BECOME ADDICTED
TO A DRUG WHICH THEY NEVER EVER TAKE - because
it is the taking of an addictive drug which ALONE
it is those factors which act to prompt individuals into deciding or agreeing
to take such drugs which are the fundamental driving force behind drug addiction, and also
the cause of the economic and social devastation which those addicts
then impose on population and government.
living styles, fashions and educational, economic and marketing
practices of all kinds generate emotional, relationship and
employment problems, etc., for youngsters in the 13 to 30 years age
bracket. Personal problems for which they will obviously, with
increasing concern, seek some available solution – especially when
the so-called “social sciences” fail them.
solution continuously presented is “drugs” and, in respect of
smuggled illicit supplies of drugs - such as cannabis, cocaine,
crack, heroin, skunk and criminal supplies of stolen prescription
drugs such as benzodiazepines, buprenorphine, methadone and others -
we all know that 90+% of the information given out by the pushers of
these drugs IS FALSE MARKETING HYPE GIVEN OUT (often along
with a couple of free samples) TO PROCURE A NEW CUSTOMER.
THIS IS BECAUSE THE PUSHERS KNOWIT IS THE TAKING OF THE DRUG ITSELF WHICH
ENSURES THE CAPTURE OF THEIR NEW, PERMANENTLY HOOKED AND PROFITABLE
THE PSYCHO-PHARMACEUTICAL FRATERNITY ALSO KNOW THIS,
and so don't just give a few free samples to capture their permanent
and profitable clients. THEY EQUALLY INDULGE IN MASSIVE PROFESSIONAL
DIS-INFORMATION, WHILST USING THE U.K. NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE TO
PROVIDE ADDICTS WITH A FREE SUPPLY FOR LIFE – for which the
psycho-pharms get paid by the N.H.S., which gets paid by the
Chancellor, who demands payment from U.K. taxpayers !
there are 7.4% of the British adult population (over 15 years of
age) which are daily and multi-daily drug addicts, a total of
some 4 million U.K. citizens of which nearly one million are addicted
to illicit drugs and nearly three million addicted to prescription
drugs supplied by the N.H.S. - none of which citizens contribute to
our Gross Domestic Product, but instead live off the productivity of
the rest of the society.
the truth, suppressed by the psycho-pharms, is that for 50 years in 49 countries an international group
of self-help addiction recovery training charities known as Narconon®
has been proving that 70+% of addicts can, on Narconon's 13 week
residential programme, be fully recovered to the natural state of
lasting abstinence into which 95% of the population is born.
ONLY IF WE START TRAINING ADDICTS IN SELF-HELP
ADDICTION RECOVERY TECHNIQUES AND ABANDON TOTALLY ALL “TREATMENTS”
BASED ON PSYCHIATRY AND PHARMACEUTICAL DRUG PRESCRIBING
learn about the billions of taxpayer £pounds and millions of British
lives this would save, OR, to dispute the above data, you may like to
phone Ken Eckersley on
(01342) 810151. Ken is available most days between
11.00am and 9.00pm.
WORLD” Blog Posts
sponsored by the Society
for an Addiction
has taken 68 years for the psychiatric and pharmaceutical fraternity
to convert some 2.4 Million of our population into profitably
prescribed daily pill-popping patients, and keep them that way.
they are on continuous medication to ‘manage’
sickness, disease, anxiety, dementia, pain, a habit or behaviour, etc., except
for pain-killers, the factor which keeps them demanding their daily
supplies is seldom, if
the problem for which their drugs were originally prescribed.
well over 90+% of cases that problem disappeared in the first month
or so of “treatment” and did so because, in the same way that
bruises, cuts, scratches, burns, fevers, pimples, indigestion,
headaches, colds, sunburn, and a host of other physical ailments and
heal or cure themselves, so also do losses, anxieties, worries,
shocks, rage, fears and other depressing emotional conditions also
naturally diminish and fade away – except
in circumstances where some suppressive factor such
imposes itself on the individual’s life.
minds and bodies are designed to be naturally self-repairing and,
when allowed to do so without interference but with good
understanding, make an incredibly brilliant job of it.
the same way that we use “First Aid” to keep an injury clean and
protected to minimise additional physical
harm factors and to allow our natural healing powers to operate, so
also are there mental
first aid factors in the form of “Emotional Assists” which anyone
can learn to apply to themselves and to others.
to give nature time to take its course, one has to be ready to
maintain a “stiff
and bear it”
for a short while. This is because pain
is a vital form of communication between the person and his or her
and the 'residual pain' from an injury or the 'temporary anxiety' from a
loss, are nature’s way of reporting the progress of healing and
ensuring that we do not overstress that body part or emotional area
until healing is complete.
why should you EVER have to “suffer” even for a short while”
say the overly “kind” and “pseudo sympathetic” MEDICATION
we can make life so nice for you with our ever growing “choice”
what they offer amongst other “immediate benefits” (i.e.
quick-fixes), are symptom based pain-killers, sleeping pills,
tranquillisers, soporifics, stimulants and other prescription
medication – a majority of which can be habit forming or addictive
and often also have hypnotic qualities which can permit command
factors in the environment to exercise control over our decisions and
effect, instead of permitting and encouraging natural self-healing,
they seek to take control of our bodies, minds and emotions during
the early stages of healing, by cutting off our communications
to-and-from our injuries and whilst there is little doubt that in
some cases this can “appear” to be of comfort, it is not of help
to the actual healing process.
what many of their prescriptions do, is to eliminate some of the
useful natural pain and minor discomfort in the early healing stages
immediately following injury or loss. Valuable sensations designed
to inform us
of healing progress or lack thereof in respect of our injuries or
because many of those prescriptions are poison based, they can at the
same time create conditions for far worse problems to arise in the
not too distant future.
the point of view of a self-healing body or mind, interfering
with what that body and mind is trying to do to promote its natural
healing, is the
unnecessary imposing of
some profit making chemical control factor on its operation which,
(especially when the prescribed substance is addictive and hypnotic),
can become increasingly and permanently suppressive in regard to the
individual’s future lifestyle, progress, happiness and survival
EARLY an application of a painkiller or tranquilliser (which,
like so many such substances are addictive and / or hypnotic)leads
a permanent addictive demand for and usage of that substance, because
the crushing “cold turkey” effects of withdrawal from the drug
can often be much greater than the temporary minor pains and
discomforts which the body and mind ask us to confront and bear with,
the initial stages of natural healing.
and their psychiatric marketeers know that addiction
to any substance is the best possible factor ensuring
that the user will be a permanent consumer of that substance.
And they also know that the main continuation factor (rather
than being a desire for a “high”)
is the user’s decidedly unpleasant experience of, and fear of, the
cold turkey effects they all suffer whenever they try to stop. But,
instead of blaming their profit orientated product, the psycho-pharms
prefer to falsely blame the user for seeking the “high”.
course, patients naturally try to stop using, because of the many and
varied side-effects which can be created by even minimum usage of any
toxic or unnatural poisonous substance. Such side-effects can
include diarrhoea, vomiting, drowsiness, constipation, insomnia,
cramps, aches, dizziness, exhaustion, loss of sleep, anxiety and many
other factors varying from user to user.
when they try slamming on the brakes in the hope of safely stopping
their increasingly debilitating addiction, the
resultant cold turkey effects
can be far more devastating than the drug created side-effects they
are trying to get rid of.
a result they then unfortunately and uncomfortably have to try to
learn to live with such side-effects as
their daily drug dosages.
the above, it will be seen that the real problem in regardto
helping the millions of involuntary addicts quit their habit and
avoid the side-effects of their “medication”
is the fact that the pharmaceutical industry (which
is well equipped to sponsor and help gradual withdrawal procedures)
is the very same commercial operation which has as its main goal the
procurement of increasing usage of as many as possible of their
addictive products by an increasing number of people year after year.
so-called “self-regulation” by the psycho-pharms is NEVER ever
going to produce a better result than the time wasting, smarmy,
“medication-sustaining” justifying and excusing lip-service to
which politicians have been subjected over the last 68 years by
big-pharma marketing men.
manipulative ploys have included, amongst others:
whole countrywide 65 years of “never-ever-intended-to-cure”
Substitution Therapy (methadone, etc.),
five years incestuous “National Treatment Outcome Research Study”
of psychiatric “treatments” - conducted by psychiatrists
final useful report of the failure of such psychiatric
results - and,
recent failed 4 year psychiatric “piloting” of “Payment by
Results” in the drug recovery sector, which has deliberately
aborted implementation of the Coalition’s brilliant 2010 and still
current Drugs Strategy, simply because treating drug addiction WITH
cure and never can
a result of these persistent psycho-pharm efforts to avoid any
reduction in the increasingly vast numbers of U.K. citizen’s
addicted to their products, it is vital that “Reduction
of Involuntary Addiction”
is (for obvious reasons) conducted as a separate government
initiative which does not involve psychiatrists and only peripherally
involves pharmacists – under
TIGHT regulation and legislation.
are therefore set out as follows
the formation by the Government of:
special national & local recovery department for involuntarily
addicted patients – totally independent of psychiatry and
together, every involuntary addict who stops taking an average of
over 1,095 expensive medical drug doses a year will create a saving
more than enough to pay for the whole WASH Teams scheme.
TO ESCAPE FROM THE U.K’S PRESENT EXCESSIVE WASTEFULL OVER-USAGE OF
the last 60 plus years of so-called “patient management” by
long-term prescription medication, the pharmaceutical companies, and
their psychiatric and medical marketing arms have developed the
pill-popping treatments of our NHS into a nearly unstoppable “health
service” methodology, whereby just abruptly stopping the
prescribing of any drug to the millions of its present users is
calculated to cause chaotic protest, and thus ensure that demand for
their products continues.
definition of an “EFFECTIVE DRUGS POLICY” is one which
a society or community in
the direction of
- i.e. it is not a society totally without drugs, but is a society
whose policy is to continuously move our communities towards
becoming a society FREE
OF ADDICTION and addictive drug supply and consumption.
the action needed to progress towards that is NOT just to stop dead
all the current prescribing of existing patients under such
THERE ARE THREE MAIN STEPS:
expanding the current list of patients being prescribed medical
respect ONLY of symptoms.
i.e. allow no new consumers of such substances to be prescribed by
any psychiatrists or other physicians until
laboratory testing and full CAUSE diagnosis has been completed
and sufficient time for any initial physical or mental trauma has
elapsed, to permit the
natural healing processes
to start taking effect.
other words, stop increasing the total of N.H.S. patients solely on
palliative pharmaceutical treatment based on prescribing for the
handling of symptoms rather than seeking the underlying cause of the
symptom(s) - such as allergies, dietary deficiencies and excesses,
or undiagnosed injuries or infections, etc. Depending on the nature
of their patient’s trauma this will likely be a non-prescribing
period of from 1 to 4 weeks.
handle the existing 2.4 million involuntarily addicted NHS patients
each costing U.K. taxpayers an average of some £1,095 per year,
and train a total nationwide force of say 2,000 Involuntary
Medication Addiction Withdrawal Advisory Services & Help
“Recovery Managers”, spread across every local county area.
authorised and trained (amongst other duties) to determine the sizes
of and to supply “step-down” dosages of the medications to which
their clients are already daily addicted, each Recovery Manager
costing around £1,500 to recruit, pay and train over a two week
each IMAWASH Recovery Manager with a small motor vehicle and a local
client group of 32 N.H.S. addicts to manage towards, and to bring to
full, abstinence, over
an average period of 20 weeks per patient, thus allowing each
Recovery Manager to withdraw 80 current addicts per year, over a
period of 48 working weeks. (N.B.
80 recovered addicts together thereafter save £87,600 per year for
each abstinent year they live.)
of G.P. consultation, dispensing, admin & collection time, etc.)
the current cost to the Exchequer of providing and delivering 3 to 4
doses a day of those drugs to which patients have become
involuntarily addicted can likely be higher, for the examples given
here, we have taken an all inclusive cost of only £1.00 per dose and
only 3 doses a day. i.e. a minimum cost to the N.H.S. of £1,095 per
year per patient, which includes not only the actual drug supply but
also their 7 to 21 day interviewing, prescribing, dispensing and
collecting time and effort, etc.
the other hand, up to 20 weeks of an average of two to three times a
week 30 minute visits to each withdrawing patient (i.e.
16 visits a day per Manager inclusive of travel time)
by a trained IMAWASH Manager will cost under £500 per cured addict,
even if the IMAWASH Recovery Manager follows up on a once a month
basis for three months after
each patient is fully withdrawn.
an annual total cost per IMAWASH Recovery Manager of £40,000
(£26,000 of which is salary), b)
a current U.K. involuntarily addicted client list of over 2,400,000,
and with c)
each IMAWASH Manager also creating pure savings
of over £47,600 per year by d)
each withdrawing 80 clients a year, we would need e)
2,000 trained IMAWASH Managers to cure the present list of
involuntary addicts in 16 years. (This
long length of time is a clear indication of the size of the
doing this, those 2,000 Recovery Managers would together SAVE the
U.K. Taxpayers (over
and above the £40,000 it costs to fund each manager's work area)
£47,600 per year so that in the whole 16 years (assuming
no new patients become involuntarily addicted)
there would be a saving of over £1.5223 BILLION.
other words, the indicated WASH involuntarily addicted recovery
programme, whilst curing N.H.S. patients, will not only pay the full
cost of running its own department and programme, but will also make
a healthy additional contribution to the Chancellor of the
MANY OTHER N.H.S. SPONSORED INITIATIVES CAN DO THAT ? And what
should we do with that huge level of savings each year ?
the answer is provided by the Government's own National Audit Bureau,
which tells us that EVERY SINGLE ONE of the country's N.H.S. supplied
prescription methadone and other OST users costs the Chancellor of
the Exchequer (and thus the U.K. Taxpayers) over £47,000 per annum
per methadone addict for an average of 40 years. (Other
university studies show that p.a. sum to be closer to £60,000.)
the nearly 200,000 currently prescribed methadone and other O.S.T.
users, we know
from statistics of the last 50 years that the Narconon®
self-help residential addiction recovery training programme, when
presented with enrolment groups of 4 addicts, can help 65+% cure
themselves on a 13 week residential programme costing £39,000 per
addict on a Payment
full 12 months lasting abstinence basis (and
only £9,000 per addict B&B+toiletry
if no period of abstinence whatsoever is achieved in 26 weeks, i.e.
twice through the programme).
a result, on a Payment by Results basis the above 16 year £1.53
Billion saving could
pay for the curing of 39,000 current methadone users, thus saving the
Chancellor another £114,562 each year for 16 years.
progression based on saving £47,000 per addict at a cost of only
£39,000 per addict will see the present total of methadone (OST)
addicts reduced from the current 200,000 to zero in 16 years - funded
by IMAWASH Recovery Managers.
at that point, the Government could then afford to additionally start
curing the illicitly
users of amphetamines, cannabis, cocaine, crack, ecstasy, heroin and
main point of this paper is to emphasize that it very provably costs
the Chancellor of the Exchequer (and UK Taxpayers) much
TO MAINTAIN both legal involuntary and illicit recreational addicts
in their addictions - than it does TO PERMANENTLY CURE them on a
Payment by Results residential self-help addiction recovery training
years it will take to reach a nearly addiction free society is an
indication of the size and seriousness of the current problem, and
the necessity for starting now to implement policies based on
addicts to responsibly help themselves
instead of the current psycho-pharmaceutically profitable lifelong
addictive prescribing of daily dosages in the name of “habit
that half of our population directly responsible for our Gross
National Product, actually carries the 7% of the U.K. population who
are addicted, and who are thus a none productive burden on the rest.
only 5 of that 7% to the natural state of relaxed abstinence into
which 99% of the population is born – will revolutionise our
economy, and help avoid further austerity.
DO NOT FORGET:
THERE IS ONE THING STOPPING THIS !
the pharmaceutical industry 1) does not want to lose its over
2,400,000 profitable involuntary addicts to which it supplies some
Million doses of addictive medication EACH AND EVERY DAY,
and 2) because it does not want to lose its 200,000 profitable
methadone and other O.S.T. addicts to which it supplies a further
200,000 doses of addictive medication EACH AND EVERY DAY,
pharmaceutical companies are EXTREMELY reluctant to widely and
cheaply supply the small enough “step- down” dosages of the
opioid painkillers, benzodiazepines, “z” drugs and others needed
to make the above economic withdrawal from involuntary drug addiction
into a workable and working national programme.
we would be stupid to expect the psycho-pharms to voluntarily
kill off the geese which lay them golden eggs in terms of daily
involuntary addiction consumption and methadone daily dose
a result, it will require some very simple and straightforward new
legislation to ensure that they toe-the-line and thus make possible a
U.K. economy which is no longer the European nation with more
addiction than other E.U. member countries.
there is ALWAYS some minor discomfort in a reduction or step-down
system of withdrawal from medical drug dependency, we know that the
vast majority of patients can, with
tolerate and succeed with 14 day step down reductions of not
7.5% of their current daily dosages. However, a relative few will
have a back-off from confronting reductions greater than 5% or even
2.5%, and will therefore need to be handled on those lower percentage
very approximately we are looking at 20 x 7 day reductions of 5%, or
14 x 10 day reductions of 7.5%.
100 as the established multi-daily dosage, this can be done by
insisting that a manufacturer or distributor may in future only be
licensed to produce a 100 mg tablet, PROVIDED he also produces a 50,
a 25, a 10, a 5 and a 2.5 mg tablet, and these dose sizes equally
apply to both powder and liquid capsules.
short range of only five step-down dose sizes allows the dispensing
to the patient of the whole range of dosages from 100mg, to 97.5, to
95, to 92.5, to 90, to 87.5, to 85, and on down to 10, 7.5, 5 and
2.5mgs. In fact, when in tablet form, a 100mg tablet can be cut in
half or into quarters, but the 10, 5 and 2.5 mg sizes are needed to
compete the whole step-down range based on 5% and 2.5% reductions.
doses are not divisible and so necessitate production of all five
step-down dose sizes, but simple liquid dosages should be capable of
being measured out and dispensed at every dosage level, inclusive of
injected liquid doses.
the established multi-daily dose is other than 100, the same
principle would be followed based on the established originally
recommended dose size.)
it requires is the earnest cooperation, or lawful coercion of the
pharmaceutical industry to solve the problem of addiction to their
products, which alone – create every day, every week, every month
and every year, the increasing dependency of more and more of our
citizens, and thus the ruination of our economy and society.
can become addicted to a drug or medication they never take, because
it is the drugs themselves which cause & maintain addiction.
remember, we mainly decide to try or take drugs only because
are wrongly advised or persuaded, or
otherwise led to believe that they will solve a personal problem.
ADDICTS DAILY USE DRUGS. NONE USERS DON'T !
DEMAND REDUCTION relies, not on “prevention” but entirely on
making cures available . . . .
that can be done on a Payment by Results basis in 65+% of cases.
further information you may wish to phone (01342) 810151 or 811099,