Self-Help Addiction Recovery Training

 

LEARNING TO CURE

 

YOURSELF OF

 

DRINK & DRUG

 

ADDICTION.

BASED ON 50 YEARS OF INTERNATIONAL SUCCESS.

As you may well have noticed, you can't live somebody else's life for them, and equally, nobody else can live your life for you.

So that, whether we like it or not, life is a do-it-for-yourself activity.

This means that becoming addicted to drink or drugs is also mainly a do-it-for-yourself activity AND ALSO that escaping from addiction is something you must do-for-yourself, provided you know how to go about it.

A self-help residential programme of addiction recovery training for lasting relaxed abstinence is vastly different from other addiction rehab systems because, instead of offering “treatment”, it “TRAINS” addicts in HOW TO CURE THEMSELVES.

And it is the many differences in a self-help training programme which make all the difference to the results which such programmes obtain first time through in from 55 to 69+% of cases.

The FIRST Difference: between a self-help training programme and other forms of rehabilitation is found in such programme's view of the individual addict who is regarded as an “addiction victim” and designated as a “STUDENT” rather than as a “patient”, a “client”, a “bum”, a “criminal”, a misuser, an abuser or a “service user”.

An “addicted patient” for psychiatrists and pharmaceutical producers is a client with an addictive demand who should be “treated” by doing something “TO” him or her in order to have that addict as a consumer of substitute addictive medication for as long as U.K., taxpayers via the NHS, will go on paying for prescribed supplies of drugs such as methadone and Subutex, etc.

The definition of a “criminal drug user” varies from country to country and from time to time, but the intention and effect of the “criminal” label is to punish what any particular jurisdiction currently regards as a crime – which in practice across the world can mean anything from being given a caution or being sentenced to a fine, imprisonment, a whip lashing or even execution !

And interestingly, the above “criminal” view of addiction is usually concerned only with smuggled, stolen, illegal and designer drugs, and so does not include the vast majority of addictive substances such as licensed ALCOHOL and prescribed MEDICAL drugs – each of which are vastly bigger problems than smuggled, stolen, illegal and designer drugs.

The defining of an addict as a “student” recognises four things:

a) That 70 to 75% of all drink and drug addicts who have been using for more than 3 weeks, 3 months, 3 years or 30 years desperately want to quit, and although they have thus tried and failed on numerous occasions (often daily) to do so, they nevertheless have no lack of willingness to stop. Their problem is simply and actually “finding out HOW to stop”.

b) That – (because life is obviously and inescapably a “do-it-for-yourself” activity) – addiction is NOT just about a chemical substance but is a condition permitted by the individual's lack of a real understanding of life, mainly brought about by misinformation & lies from vested commercial interests in the massive alcohol and medical supply businesses, as well as from criminal sources.

 

c) That an addict is no longer in total charge of his or her life and so wishes to again take control, and,

d) That, to again take control of his or her life, an addict needs training in self-help addiction recovery techniques, with which they can concurrently procure lasting relaxed abstinence for themselves, and thus thereafter be able to easily apply what they have learned - for life.

 

So the first vital difference is that a self-help programme does not “treat” drug addicts, nor does it transfer addicts from one addictive substance to another as in so called Opioid Substitution Therapy where addicts are moved from illegal heroin to legally prescribed but more addictive methadone or Subutex, thus basically ensuring they remain as prescription drug addicts for life.

Self-help instead TRAINS THEM to cure themselves !

GIVE A MAN A FISH, AND YOU FEED HIM FOR A DAY.

BUT, TEACH HIM HOW TO FISH, AND YOU FEED HIM FOR LIFE.

This is the difference between treatment in most rehabs and training in self-help addiction recovery.

Give a heroin addict methadone and you satisfy his habit for that one day. But teach him HOW to take control of and get rid of his habit, and you give him the gift of recovery of the natural state of relaxed abstinence into which he was born, and which he can then maintain.

Which brings us to self-help's very different recognition of “WHY” addiction occurs.

SECOND Difference: Psychiatrists, psychologists, politicians, social workers and police, etc., assign a large variety of reasons as to why an individual becomes an addict. They ignore completely the fact that the UK's largest group of addicts (over 2 million) are NHS patients prescribed into involuntary addiction by the medical profession, and instead blame “peer pressure”, wanting a “thrill” or a “high”, irresponsibility, lawlessness, recklessness, criminal inclination, misuse and numerous other “possible” causes.

But for centuries medicine, alcohol and drugs have been used to solve problems, and that is still the reason for their usage today. For certain heart problems we take aspirin, for a headache or toothache we take paracetamol or some other pain killer, for the problem of travel sickness we take another tablet, for the problem of shock or family loss we are prescribed Valium or another “benzo” drug, and to solve shyness or anxiety many take spirit alcohol or another chemical stimulant, etc.

And it is the misinformation and even downright lies which are used to make the guy (who has what he “considers” a problem) use an addictive drug in order to solve it.

In fact, Mary Wakefield the deputy editor of the “Spectator” once commented that the pharmaceutical industry has grown into possibly the largest industry in the world by manufacturing “A Pill for Every Ill”.

“Drugs solve problems” - or so we are told from an early age, not only by psycho-pharms, but also by Grandma, Dad & Mum, our local doctor and even the local pub barman.

It is therefore not at all surprising to find self-help students finding and recognising for themselves that they decided or agreed to take an addictive substance IN ORDER TO SOLVE WHAT THEY THEMSELVES (and usually them alone) CONSIDERED A PROBLEM OF SURVIVAL IN THEIR DAILY LIFE OR ENVIRONMENT.

In other words: DRUGS ARE A SOLUTION – NOT A PROBLEM.

But strangely enough, most “treatment” forms of addiction rehabilitation, EXCEPT self-help, basically consider drugs as “a problem” which doctors believe can only be solved with some form of medication.

A solution is simply an action adopted by individuals to handle some problematic situation in their life.

Those readers with the benefit of self-help training will know that a solution comes under the heading of “a self-determined change”. i.e. It is not something forced on the individual.

So the second difference is that self-help training recognises that the initial cause of addiction is not a search for thrills, or highs, or misuse, or abuse, but that the cause is the desire of an individual to solve what he or she considers a worrying personal problem by employing a solution which he or she is wrongly advised or led to believe involves using an addictive substance.

So they are a VICTIM of both the addictive drug and the misleading information given them in order to persuade them to try a few doses.

In other words, they make a disastrous decision to use an addictive substance based on a lie or on some misunderstanding, and become addicted because it is addictive drugs themselves which are what impose and enforce addiction on the user.

This is obvious, because NO-ONE CAN EVER BECOME ADDICTED TO A DRUG WHICH ONE NEVER EVER USES !

THIRD Difference: From the above we see that the goals of self-help training are:

1) knowledge of recovery techniques,

2) resurrection of personal responsibility, and

3) the regaining of relaxed control of one's life - leading to self-determination

    of one's life.

But for other addiction rehabilitation systems the goal is often to be able to struggle through each difficult day - one day at a time - without taking the drug to which they are addicted, just by courageously fighting their craving.

Whilst this can eventually bravely lead some to increasingly relaxed abstinence, because other rehab systems make no attempt to remove the individual's store of drug toxins and metabolites lodged in the fatty tissues of the body, there is always the possibility of re-stimulation from the breakdown of such deposits, their release into the blood stream, a consequent re-triggering of desire for the drug, and a return to addiction. Release of such addictive deposits is triggered by increases in body temperature usually caused by physical work, exercise and / or weather hot enough to lead to sweating.

Which brings us to an examination of the technicalities and nomenclature involved in recovery from addiction.

FOURTH Difference: When self-help training says: “detoxification”, we mean flushing from the addict's body ALL drug residues, metabolites, hormones and other toxic deposits built up by addiction and life in general.

When a psychiatrist, doctor or pharmacists says: “detoxification”, they misleadingly mean the stopping of the regular taking of any further doses of a particular addictive substance. (What self-help regards as: “withdrawal”.)

 

So, when an addict is given medication to stop him taking heroin, that is the psycho-pharm idea of a “heroin detox”. The addict is no longer adding to the store of toxic heroin metabolites in his body, but nevertheless he still retains whatever damagingly poisonous store of them he has already built-up.

However, IF in order to stop the heroin intake he is prescribed methadone or Subutex, etc., (which is normally the case), IN ADDITION TO his existing store of heroin metabolites, he then starts to build up a further store of methadone metabolites or Subutex metabolites, etc., any or all of which (including the original heroin) – by engaging in hard physical work, energetic sport or just warmer than normal summer weather conditions – can by sweating be released from the body's fatty tissues, re-enter the bloodstream and lead to a return to a former state of addictive desire.

“Recovered” and “rehabilitated” are other words which for self-help trainees have different meanings from those which other addiction rehabilitation systems assign them.

For us: “recovered” means returning to the natural state of lasting relaxed abstinence into which 99% of the population is born. To fully understand why this is different – try ringing a local rehab and asking what THEY mean by “recovered” ! Or ring your local MP and ask what he or she (mis)understands by “recovered”.

Self-help training goals (and achievements) are seen by many as sky-high when compared to the goals of most other rehabs.

FURTHER Differences:

Because of the fundamentally basic differences between the self-help “TRAINING” approach and psycho-pharm “TREATMENT” approaches the reasons why self-help is totally different becomes apparent in every aspect of an addict's journey through his or her programme.

Self-help training “withdrawal” procedures are DRUG-FREE. Many other withdrawals are not. In LASTING RELAXED ABSTINENCE terms self-help programme results run at a 55 to 69+% success rate, normally reached in 11 to 13 weeks.

 

Methadone achieves only 3% abstinence after decades of prescribed usage. Twelve Steps does better at 20 to 30% achieved in 9 to 36 months or longer.

And even the cost of delivering self-help training residential recovery is different from other residential rehabilitation operations, because of our willingness and ability to offer the choice of “Payment by Results” as an alternative to the usual full up-front fee for attendance on course rather than for an agreed result.

Depending on local property and wages costs, which can vary from one part of the UK to another, the current self-help programme fee for the newest Centre in the expensive south of London counties is £29,000 on a Payment by Results basis. But other residential rehabs cost from £12,000 to £39,000 or more, for treatment periods far shorter than self-helps 12 weeks and with full payment due irrespective of the result.

And of course results of 20 to 30% abstinence are nowhere near as valuable as the self-help training results of 55 to 69+% of lasting relaxed abstinence and recovery – first time through the programme.

There is also another important difference.

Psycho-pharm treatment prescribing considers ALL addicts as nearly impossible to cure, as a result of which they say they should ALL be put on Subutex or methadone Opioid Substitution Therapy (OST).

On the other hand, self-help training centres know from 50 years experience of training addicts to cure themselves, that 70 to 75% of addicts who have been using for months or years WANT TO QUIT, have tried at numerous times (often daily) to do so and yet, having again failed, STILL WANT TO STOP.

THEIR PROBLEM IS THEREFORE NOT WILLINGNESS,

IT IS LACK OF RECOVERY KNOW-HOW.

The other 25 to 30% are resistive cases who for the three well known main reasons have no desire or intention whatsoever to quit. These are the horses you can lead to water, but who will not drink. So, with no willingness, how can they ever be trained ?

The other 70 to 75% of addicts need, want AND DESERVE Self-Help Training Technology. And the rest of the society also needs them to have it, because addicts are the 5% of the UK population which impinge most heavily on the lives of the other 95%.

It is therefore encouraging to observe that internationally more citizens and a majority of policy-makers are now recognising the direction in which addiction inevitably takes our families and society, and have seen that the most important first step is to REDUCE THE DEMAND which can arise from within a family from vested interest and criminal advice leading to poor parenting.

Westminster, Brussels, Edinburgh, Belfast, Dublin, Cardiff and other parliaments are now increasingly aware that amongst the problems which drug and alcohol addicts cause are the following:

* Addicts and drunks cause most accidents at work.

* Addicts mug and rob old people.

* Addicts and drunks cause most road accidents.

* Addicts sell drugs to children (and others).

* Addict increase the numbers of prostitutes and toy boys

    in our towns and cities.

* Addicts disrupt our schools, the education of our children

    and the life of our communities.

* Addicts bankrupt businesses and destroy jobs.

* Addicts break into and burgle people's homes.

* Addicts spread HIV, AIDS and hepatitis.

* Addicts and drunks commit the most crimes,

and,

ADDICTS ARE UNDOUBTEDLY THE REAL CURRENT THREAT TO

OUR LIVES AND TO EVERYBODY'S FUTURE.

AND THIS INCLUDES ADDICTS ON ILLEGAL, LICENSED

AND PRESCRIBED DRUGS.

This is because their addiction controls them, and

THIS AFFECTS EVERYBODY – EVERYONE'S FAMILY, EVERYONE'S

INCOME, EVERY JOB, EVERYONE'S HEALTH AND EVERY ONE'S

HOME – INCLUDING YOURS.

The above is about addicts in general and the increasing damage which they do to all walks of society and to our whole economy.

They are also the reasons why (although we might believe it is not our fault or our problem) WE MUST ALL DO OUR UTMOST TO POSITIVELY HELP ADDICTS reduce their numbers and their dependency on those of us who do not use drugs.

Because we have the truth staring us in the face, we can be sure it is no use relying on government alone to solve the substance addiction problems which are daily causing anxiety, crime, violence, terrorism, damage, accidents, injuries, disease and even death.

Every one of us is needed to solve this problem because, in the final analysis, it is OUR problem, even if our family and children have so far managed to avoid actual drug usage and the direct results of addictive behaviour.

SO, IT IS SINCERELY HOPED YOU AND YOURS WILL NEVER HAVE

TO DIRECTLY FACE ADDICTION, AND HOPED ALSO THAT YOU WILL RECOGNISE THAT SUCH AN ESCAPE WILL MAINLY COME ABOUT BECAUSE YOU HELPED STAMP OUT ADDICTIVE DRUGS

BY HELPING VICTIMS OF ADDICTION TO RECOVER !

-------------------------------------------------------

For further information, you may wish to contact:

Elisabeth M. Reichert, Field Staff Member

for Narconon United Kingdom,

e-mail elisabeth.3@btinternet.com, or phone 0775 263 0319.

who can arrange for you to inspect (without obligation),

and talk to the staff and students at,

the NARCONON UNITED KINGDOM Training Centre,

at HEATHFIELD, East Sussex, TN21 0DJ.

HOW THE WEB OF LIES IN THE U.K. ADDICTION SCENE STANDS IN THE WAY OF MASS RECOVERY TO LASTING ABSTINENCE.

It is only when you begin to examine the structure, the component parts and the vast quantity of deliberately false data circulating in the substance addiction sector, that you can start to comprehend WHY our country is Europe's leading drug disaster area.

As most of us are aware, there are four main groups of people dedicated to the profitable supply of addictive substances. 1) The alcoholic drinks industry, 2) the criminal and / or terrorist “recreational” drug smuggling cartels, 3) the pharmaceutical chemical industry, and of course 4) their “partners” in the drug prescribing fraternity (comprised mainly of misguided palliatively trained general practitioners, similarly trained medical staff and - psychiatric pseudo scientific market manipulators).

Other “interested parties” are our Civil Service officials plus their elected Ministers and MPs and, of course, the public in general – who are the main mass marketplace for addictive and hypnotic substances and which dangerously also includes most of all of the various types of suppliers.

Obviously the so-called “Drug Barons” foster the production and supply of drugs in order to line their pockets and for personal aggrandisement.

But so also do the alcoholic drinks producers and the pharmaceutical chemical companies, whilst ALL OF THEM, in one way or another, also take the fullest possible advantage of the addictive and hypnotic powers of their products in order to physically and mentally capture increasing numbers of inescapably loyal and profitably addicted customers.

The main difference between the Drug Barons and the other addictive drug suppliers is that “the others” usually pay their taxes and so are responsible for a major proportion of government income.

As a result, whilst governments continuously “make war” on Drug Barons, those same governments seem prepared to reach damaging accommodations with the alcohol trade and the pharmaceutical industry, based on clearly irrational advice from the psychiatric self-preserving drug pushers.

In view of the nature and the vast profit goals of the above main players in the addiction -v- abstinence game, it is hardly surprising to find that the main commodity circulating at each and every level in the addiction sector is MIS-INFORMATION in the form of advertising, innuendo, unproven statements, sound bites, guesses, opinions, propaganda, theories, beliefs, rumours, hopes, sales patter, speculation on research results and downright lies, etc.

This is gross deliberate mis-information upon which governments make policy decisions, plus often unintentionally repeated mis-information upon which individuals are led to decide to try or to use addictive substances.

The main gross lie fed to policy makers by the psycho-pharm fraternity is that - most forms of substance addiction are basically incurable !

Nothing could be further from the truth, but this lie arises for two main reasons: 1) the psycho-pharm fraternity cannot cure drug addiction by any form of prescribing, and, 2) they don't want to cure addiction, because curing addicts loses profitable consumers of pharmaceutical drugs and misleading psychiatric diagnostic services paid for by taxpayers.

Other lies are that individuals become addicted because they have “addictive personalities”, or because they “abuse” alcohol or “misuse” drugs. But the truth is that most drugs are addictive, so that, MOST IMPORTANTLY, you can never ever become addicted to a drug which you never take – because it is THE TAKING of the drugs WHICH CREATES ADDICTION !

So THE TRUE CREATORS OF ADDICTION ARE: The producers and distributors of alcohol, criminal recreational drugs, and prescription drugs, AND the lies they employ to persuade individuals to agree to start using drugs, PLUS the manipulated Ministers who naively encourage this.

But why do individual U.K. citizens decide or agree to ingest a substance they likely know is toxic and / or addictive ?

Because i) they are searching for a solution to what they consider is a chronic problem of MAJOR personal significance, and, ii) the biased professional and criminal marketing information, on which they are basing their decision or agreement to use or not use, is so often mis-leadingly slanted in favour of having them decide TO USE that supplier's drug to solve their problem.

Taking drugs is always agreed to in the HOPE of solving some problem.

The drug pusher at the school gates knows full well that if he gives a few free samples to a curious teenager, those samples will automatically convert that boy or girl into a willing and increasingly addicted paying daily customer, who might well soon be committing regular crimes to pay for his or her habit.

The busy General Practitioner hastily scribbling a prescription for Valium for a grieving patient may not have the same intentions as the school gate pusher, but that doctor's 7 to 10 day 3 times a day prescription does exactly the same job of creating an addict – this time paid for by our taxpayers.

The main instigators of all this are the psychiatrists working for and with the pharmaceutical companies. The psycho-pharm fraternity are not just merely aware that many of their products and prescriptions are addictive and also in some cases hypnotic – they deliberately exploit those damaging attributes to build their “captured clients list”, and to maximise their daily sales to those so called patients.

There are nearly 2.4 million INVOLUNTARILY ADDICTED PERSONS who are NHS “patients” in the U.K. But if they are “patients” - WHAT IS THE MEDICAL CONDITION FOR WHICH THEY ARE STILL BEING TREATED ? When they started three months, one year or ten years ago, their problem might then have been worry, grief, anxiety, depression, stomach-ache, toothache, headache or pain from a healing injury, etc., etc.

But in 99 out of a hundred cases those conditions will have cleared up in a few weeks and what they are now suffering from is not an illness or disorder, but merely “cold turkey” addiction withdrawal symptoms if they go too long without their continuously addicting daily or three times a day prescribed benzodiazepine or opioid based pain-killing drugs, etc.

In fact, iatrogenically (medically) caused involuntary addiction to pharmaceutical drugs is probably the single biggest health problem being daily “treated” or “managed” by the NHS today.

i.e a condition caused by doctors unnecessarily prescribing &/or over prescribing addictive drugs, with little regard for their habit and dependency forming powers, or the fact that the pharmaceutical industry offers little or no cure for the addictions they cause. This is mainly because, although a small dose step-down withdrawal procedure and cure is totally possible for millions of patients, they quietly avoid producing or supplying the necessary small doses because they want that highly profitable daily business to continue !

Disease and sickness “management”, habit “management” & behaviour “management” are all medical prescription procedures which pour multi-millions of pills, capsules, tablets, liquid doses, inhaled doses and injections into millions of patients every single day in an endeavour to palliatively control “symptoms” with drugs as an alternative to other possible procedures.

Such palliative so-called “patient management by prescription” is the pharmaceutical promoting set of procedures originated by Rockefeller and the Carnegie Institute a century ago via their Carnegie Foundation.

By showering hundreds of millions of dollars on U.S. medical schools, universities and teaching hospitals, in the form of research grants, across 160 such teaching institutions, the Foundation sought to dictate not what SHOULD BE taught, but what SHOULD NOT be taught.

Natural healing concepts were criticised and disparaged and started to disappear from study curricula, along with learning the role of allergies; studying what nutritional shortages and excesses could do; and students were told why one should be careful of using herbs, spices and other plants when carefully and hygienically produced pharmaceutical prescription medicines are “so much purer and reliable”, etc.

As a result, by 1927, the number of U.S. medical schools, colleges, universities and teaching hospitals had been halved, those which would not co-operate with the Rockefeller / Carnegie combine having been starved of grant support. (For a full description of what Rockefeller and the Carnegie Foundation did to U.S. and world medical practices read: “Censored HEALTH” by Gabor Lenkei, M.D.)

Since then, pharmaceutical companies in every developed country have adopted the same promotional concepts, squeezing out of medical training institutions any healing concepts and procedures which in any way invalidate or offer alternatives to the prescribing of pharmaceutical preparations.

As a result, our modern junior, and even many not so junior, doctors, G.Ps and Consultants are too often not even remotely aware that they and their technology are products of a rigid selection process geared to hidden commercial objectives. 

This long term manipulation of the whole of medical training towards nearly automatic prescription writing, today underlies all the problems apparent in the NHS as it mainly 'manages' symptoms instead of seeking causes & cures.

Furthermore, because we have a democratic political system which permits recently elected M.Ps (often without health experience or with professional qualifications in unrelated subjects) to govern our country, when it comes to medical matters they far too often have to learn from the doctors with manipulated training backgrounds or from government psychiatrists or from the commercially biased pharmaceutical representatives, whose American predecessors were responsible for manipulating doctors' training and whose board directors and marketing departments now TODAY knowingly use addiction as the world's ultimate and most effective sales tool.

As an automatic consequence, politicians and officials are broadly, although indirectly, under the controlling influence of the psycho-pharmaceutical fraternity who are thus allowed to go on merrily addicting and maintaining in an addicted state at least 2.4 million U.K. NHS patients at taxpayer expense.

When it comes to addictive usage by individuals trying to solve a personal or relationship problem (on the basis of bum “advice” from criminal pushers or from their peer group) we find a much smaller group, in descending order of number of users, of Cannabis (inc Skunk), Cocaine, MDMA, Amphetamine, Heroin or Methadone or Buprenorphine and NPS addicted users.

For the three well known reasons, 25 to 30% of these are essentially incurable, but the other 70 to 75% having daily tried to quit hundreds of times, and having just as regularly failed, are still desperate to quit.

So their problem is not willingness to quit. It is simply that they just don't know HOW and, when they are trained in self-help recovery techniques, the big majority of them will take themselves off their addiction and remain off for life - as has been proved at at least a hundred centres (including prison units) in 49 countries in the 50 years since 1966.

The main reason that the local police do not have sufficient resources to successfully handle local drug pushers is because our Government spends far too much money on fighting the so-called “War on Drugs” outside of Great Britain.

Why commit scarce resources to expensively taking actions in Colombia, Afghanistan, Mexico and numerous other distant foreign locations, when the pipeline of supplies which stretches from those countries to our own pubs,school gates and clubs, etc., can be more easily, effectively and inexpensively CUT by taking zero tolerance action much closer to the users being supplied by that pipeline.

By initially more or less ignoring the supply pipeline up to the local pusher or dealer, millions of £pounds plus millions of police, customs & excise hours can be saved and concentrated on the last link in the supply chain. i.e. THE PUSHER or DEALER who has to reveal him or her self in order to do business with the addicted user (who is most sensibly and usefully regarded as the addiction victim who should be rescued rather than criminalised).

The police target should be anyone who is found in possession of MORE THAN one dose or MORE THAN a single personal supply of one or more drugs.

Possession of one dose usually equals an addicted user who needs rescuing rather than criminalising.

Two doses and especially more, carried by the individual, or found in his/her car or at home, etc., usually equals “pusher” - the last link in the supply line – and he or she should be hit with every punishment available to the police, the prosecutors and the courts on a Zero Tolerance basis.

It doesn't matter if the supply line is one hundred, one thousand or one million miles long, the last link is to be found in every U.K. city, town or village close to the user AND CLOSE TO A LOCAL BRITISH BOBBY.

Furthermore, that last link can be identified by the user (the pusher's client), and if that user knows the police are not after him or her, it is not going to be all that difficult to get the users' co-operation, especially, if instead of being criminalised, the user is offered anonymity and effective treatment for their addiction – which 70 to 75% want desperately to quit.

Even pushers / dealers can be offered an opportunity to be cured if it is clear that he or she is selling drugs solely to support their own habit.

Particularly if they are prepared to give up their own immediate criminal supplier.

Working back down the supply line from the user towards the initial supplier works effectively only when the user is protected and rescued, and when government resources are diverted away from overseas spending and concentrated on local U.K. situations.

However, again this “rescue” plan is mainly defeated by mis-information.

Government decision makers are falsely convinced (by their own psychiatrists and a pharmaceutical industry which contributes so many lovely taxes) that addiction is incurable, and thus persuaded that addiction has to be “managed” by Opioid Substitution Therapy, etc., etc.

As a result, these mis-informed government policy makers are reluctant to attempt the curing of our millions of addicts – both voluntary and involuntary, and so will not listen to those non-psychiatric and non-prescribing organisations which can and do cure addiction and have done for half a century in numerous countries.

The spending of millions of Pounds, Dollars and Euros (which have each year been invested by the international psycho-pharm fraternity into propaganda since 1950 - to blacken, marginalise, disparage, ridicule, criticise, condemn and render unbelievable and ineffective those organisations which can regularly and effectively train addicts in self-help recovery from their addiction) has been extremely effective.

Effective in convincing Civil Servants and their elected governors in both Houses of Parliament that they should not meet or listen to those who claim and who can prove that they can in fact bring substance addicts to lasting relaxed abstinence.

Notwithstanding the easily provable fact that those who can bring a majority of drug addicts to lasting relaxed abstinence today have the largest and most successful addiction recovery training organisation in the world !

Today's deteriorating addiction situation in the United Kingdom is total proof of what uncaring profit and power mad booze producers, chemists and psychiatrists can do with addictive and hypnotic substances plus massive MIS-information, to create vast fortunes by letting equally unconcerned government have a share of their profits - in the form of tax revenue.

MAKE NO MISTAKE:

The vast majority of alcohol and drug addicts using every sort of addictive substance, badly want to quit their addiction for ever AND can be trained and helped to do so.

And because effectively recovering & rehabilitating addicts is a once only cost, that cost spending delivers massive government savings in what would have been the even more costly 40 addictive years which would have followed.

But not if MPs, Ministers & Officials continue to allow themselves to be bamboozled by booze producers, international pharmaceutical drug companies and pseudo-scientific psychiatrists !

All that those Ministers - whose Departments are effected by addiction - need to do to fully handle the U.K's drug and alcohol problems, is to speak with and listen to those organisations they have been persuaded by psychiatrists and pharmaceutical companies NOT to speak with and NOT to listen to !

The way in which the addiction problem spreads across several different Departments is of course part of the problem, as it permits Officials to easily pass the buck from their Department to another, which they all do.

Departments obviously the effect of the addiction scourge include: the Prime Minister's Office, the Cabinet Office, the Department for Communities and Local Government, the Home Office, the Ministry of Justice, the Law Officers and the Department for Work and Pensions, all of which will nevertheless blithely tell you that addiction is solely a Department of Health matter !

But on investigation one finds that all the Health Department's NHS does is to dole out free doses of addictive and hypnotic pharmaceutical drugs paid for by the taxpayers. (OST Methadone, Subutex, Disulfiram & benzos, etc.)

The NHS in no way attempts a cure of addiction, because they don't have a clue about how to procure lasting relaxed abstinence.

Nevertheless, the Government have placed NHS “local health consortia” in charge of commissioning local rehabilitation Providers, a majority of which struggle to deliver a 20% lasting recovery rate.

At the same time, they fail to commission those organisations which CAN DELIVER lasting relaxed abstinence in most cases, simply because of the effectiveness of psycho-pharm black propaganda in controlling opinion.

Wake up - Right Honourable Ladies and Gentlemen – and don't be embarrassed, because you are being manipulated by the world's experts !

For further information and the truth about how U.K. addiction can start to be handled before the end of this Parliament, you may wish to phone (01342) 810151 between 11.00am & 9.00pm any day, or e-mail keneck@btinternet.com.


S.A.F.E. Is A Not-For-Profit Community Support Group Formed In 1975.