IF ONLY PSYCHIATRY WAS NOT SUCH A FRAUD.

IF ONLY PSYCHIATRISTS ACTUALLY

 

KNEW SOMETHING ABOUT THE MIND

AND REALLY WERE ABLE TO CURE

MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS . . . .

Then the U.K. wouldn't have over three million hopelessly ADDICTED so-called 'mental' patients on NHS prescription drugs !

We wouldn't have to pay for nearly ten million doses of addictive drugs EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE YEAR.   Drugs which cure no one of anything, but which merely ensure that those patients' prescription addictions continue for the rest of their lives at U.K. taxpayers' expense.

That's 3,650,000,000 doses a year, and if each dose cost the N.H.S. only as little as £1.00 per dose, to manufacture, distribute, diagnose, prescribe, dispense and deliver that's £3.65 BILLION a year in order to provide nothing more than turnover, profit, dividends, salaries and bonuses for the pharmaceutical companies and fees for their psychiatric drug-pushing partners.

But, THEY DON'T TRY TO CURE THEIR PATIENTS, because a cured patient is a lost consumer.  Instead they “treat” patients or “manage” their so-called mental disorder with multi-daily doses of profitable drugs.

This is much more profitable than curing, because it daily goes on much longer.  And they get away with this because successive politicians, the press and other media have innocently swallowed - hook, line and sinker - the psychiatric lies about the “non-curability” of many so-called “mental disorders”.

It is part of the whole racket known as “palliative medicine” which is today most widely taught in our medical universities and teaching hospitals, etc., because of the influence on doctor's teaching curricula of so-called research grants given by the pharmaceutical industry to “guide” medical training.

These palliative teachings say: “You can't afford to waste precious local doctor's surgery time on testing for causes or seeking cures – so just treat the symptoms !”

And, in many cases, where the prescribed drugs are not addictive, it works quite well. But in a similar number of cases it results in continuing patient “treatment” or disorder “management” - FOR LIFE – based on multi-daily addictive drugging.

But the most dangerous and annoying thing about all this is the way it suppresses and sidelines a true science of mental health.

An effective modern science which does NOT rely on electro-shocks, narcotic shocks, brain operations (pre-frontal lobotomies and leucotomies) etc., plus unnecessary but profitable lifelong multi-daily addictive drug dosing of millions of curable patients at taxpayer expense.

Psychological and psychiatric commentators everywhere, as well as the Royal Family, the Prime Minister and other Ministers, repeatedly tell us that something must be done to improve the “Mental Health” of our great nation, and then totally fail to recognise that the problem lies NOT in the U.K. population's mental condition, but in the false practices of psychiatry and the pharmaceutical industry who have been in sole charge of this health sector since 1948 and earlier.

IN TRUTH, MENTAL HEALTH IS RELATIVELY EASY TO MAINTAIN.

But not when the intention of those “in charge” is: Turnover Expansion, Corporate Growth, Increasingly Huge Profits, Bigger Dividends, Higher Salaries and Extra Bonuses – all at any cost to the community.

And if you want proof of this, consider why the pharmaceutical industry is amongst the largest and most profitable in the world, and why it is closely followed by the other purveyor of addictive substances – the alcoholic drinks industry !

ADDICTION – especially when it is deliberate, WHICH IT ALWAYS IS - is the marketing tool which builds these gargantuan businesses and, because it is deliberate, it requires a morass of lies, misrepresentation and continuous P.R. to justify its usage in the minds of decent Ministers, troubled politicians, concerned officials and other decision-makers.

Ministers, the Royal Family and other opinion and policy-makers must see through the web of deceit and manipulative P.R. mounted by psycho-pharmaceutical lobbyists, and enact the legislation required not only to stop further medical addiction of patients, but also to make available the cures for medical addiction – along with the cures which already exist for criminal and alcoholic addiction.

At the same time, recognition and introduction into our health system of a modern mental science such as DIANETICS® would immediately start to wipe out a majority of the current so-called “mental disorders”, along with curing the addictions of millions of elderly patients.

It is, of course, because Dianetics IS fully capable of handling these problems that that mental science and its founder L. Ron Hubbard have been so aggressively and continuously attacked around the world since 1950.

His Dianetics procedures cure mental health problems and his Narconon® Programme cures drug addiction, and because these cures both act to directly and significantly reduce pharmaceutical turnover and profit, Mr Hubbard and his works are the psycho-pharmaceutical fraternity's number one target for lies.

But look at what psych Dr Chris Evans's authoritative “Dictionary of the Mind, Brain and Behaviour” says about Psychiatry:- “The trouble with psychiatry today is that it is still without a working theory, not just of the mind, but also the disturbed mind. Even a definition of mental illness is not easy to come by, so perhaps it is not surprising that to this date psychiatric methods have inevitably been of a hit or miss variety”.  (ISBN 0 09 918070 7)

When this honest published report by a leading psych practitioner is viewed alongside the fact that no-one can ever become addicted to a drug which they never ever take (because it is the drugs themselves which cause addiction) one begins to see the criminal direction which psychiatry has taken in order to hide its total lack of effective mental technology, and to take advantage of prescription pharmaceutical substances to deliberately cover up the desperately addicted lifestyles of millions of N.H.S. patients.

But in a genuinely effective mental health system (which IS privately available today), addictive drugs are not needed and, where there is addiction, whether it be illegal, medical or alcoholic, this can also be cured by currently available methods.

But only IF the psychiatrists and pharmacologists who currently advise our Government were to agree to help operate the dose reduction programmes needed to rescue medically addicted patients.  And also IF the Government backed the Narconon residential self-help addiction recovery training programme, which teaches drug and alcohol addicts to cure themselves in 12 to 14 weeks, and has been doing so for 51 years in charitably run training centres around the world.

Of course, Dianetics and Narconon are already doing their vital and effective work on a private basis in numerous countries, and their catalogue of successful results grows month by month.

But isn't it ridiculous and in fact criminal for our Government to go on paying psychiatrists and pharmaceutical companies to increasingly addict our population with pseudo mental health “treatments” and prescription “habit management” programmes which do absolutely NOTHING but rob the N.H.S. of the precious funds needed for genuine medical conditions !

AND ISN'T IT EVEN MORE RIDICULOUS THAT ALL THIS OCCURS SOLELY BECAUSE OUR POLITICIANS AND OFFICIALS ACTUALLY BELIEVE THE GROSS LIES THEY ARE TOLD BY PSYCHIATRISTS AND THE PHARMACEUTICAL BOARD DIRECTORS, MANAGERS AND MARKETING REPRESENTATIVES WHO WINE & DINE GOVERNMENT'S POLICY DECISION-MAKERS ALL OVER EUROPE.

Our policy-makers appear so mesmerised by the sheer size of the psycho-pharmaceutical fraternity and the many good things that the chemical industry does, that they are incapable of recognising the criminality and grossly damaging nature of the activities into which Big Pharma's co-operation with psychiatry has pulled and continues to pull that formerly ethical and admirable industry.

“Effective mental health” and “elimination of addiction” can both be achieved on the basis of currently available and proven technology practised around the world - mainly in the privately funded sector.

But what a better place the world could more rapidly become if Ministers would rip off their psychiatrically applied blindfolds and ear plugs, and start talking with and listening to the U.K's Dianetics practitioners of good mental health for all, and discussing the availability of self-help addiction recovery training with Narconon's providers of relaxed abstinence and a re-newed life.

For full information on Dianetics and Narconon contact any Church of Scientology, OR, for a quiet, confidential (and if required) anonymous discussion, you may phone Ken Eckersley on (01342) 811099 any day after 11.00am and before 9.00pm.

_________________________________________

This Report is Presented by:

S.A.F.E.

the

Society for an Addiction Free Existence

_________________________________________

Medical Dispensing. All In The Name Of Help . . . . Yourself !

CHAINS OF PHARMACIES AND

 

HIGH STREET CHEMISTS SHOPS

ARE NOW “KINDLY” OFFERING

TO “HELP” THE N.H.S. BY TAKING

OVER THE DISPENSING OF ALL 

DOCTORS' PRESCRIPTIONS !?

Those concerned about the “privatisation” of the N.H.S. will have had little difficulty in seeing through the recent offer / proposal of the commercial medicine and drug dispensing industry, to “kindly” take-over ALL dispensing duties from G.P. and local doctor surgeries, in order to “take some of the load off” the shoulders of Doctors' Practice Managers and their staffs.

Patients and other concerned citizens will recognise this as the forging of more or less the last link in the chain of events initiated by Rockefeller and Carnegie for the moving of the world health industry away from the diagnosing of causes and the effecting of lasting cures, and towards the “treating” of all disorders on a palliative basis concerned only with the “managing of symptoms” by chemical prescribing.

“Palliative Health Management” - which is the greater part of what we receive from the N.H.S. today, has the advantage of never losing a prescription-using patient by making the mistake of actually curing them when, with “proper management”, they can be retained as taxpayer paid consumers for life.

The ninety-five years ago cash grant supported palliative take-over of the American Medical Association's PHYSICIAN TRAINING PROGRAMMES in U.S. Medical Schools, Colleges, Universities and Teaching Hospitals has now been completed - not just in the U.S.A. - but in every advanced country including the United Kingdom.

As a result, the chemical company production of pharmaceutical drugs (a major proportion of which are addictive and / or hypnotic) is now a massive worldwide industry, with their marketing firmly and, in most cases, unknowingly in the hands of tens of thousands of General Practitioners and local doctors.  “Unknowingly”, because they are merely doing what they have been taught to do by a medical training system today biased towards “prescribing” by an intricate array of cash grants from pharmaceutical companies.

Grants made possible by the gigantic “involuntarily addiction” driven purchases made by the N.H.S. from such companies, of addictive and / or hypnotic drugs which serve no purpose other than to continuously create the unnecessary addictive demand for further supplies of the prescribed drugs upon which the major part of psycho-pharmaceutical turnover, salaries, profits and dividends are built.

An investigation of the massive number of U.K. high street chemists' shops and dispensaries reveals that, over the last decades, more and more of the “independents” have become owned or controlled by chemical or pharmaceutical production companies and / or their subsidiaries, which can then all gain from the massive T.V. and other media advertising they can together thus afford to mount.

Now, to complete their take-over of as many patients as possible and as much N.H.S. budget as possible, they also want to have under their control and in their hands the actual dispensing of the doctors' prescriptions they have so effectively organised for the marketing of their products.

A major proportion of this dispensing is currently in the hands of G.P. practices who effectively “compete” with the pharmaceutically owned chemist's shop dispensaries.

But the pharmaceutical shop owners want those patients to collect ALL their prescriptions from their high street chemists shops, where patients can also be encouraged to buy the ever widening range of “over-the-counter” non-prescription sales of headache powders, cold cures, sedatives, tonics, backache pills, foot balms, creams, lotions, cough mixtures and hair and skin “care” products, etc., etc., etc., along with their beauty products, synthetic vitamins, minerals and ranges of other products for all members of the family from the most senior of citizens to the just newly born.

By “kindly” taking-over the G.P's own dispensing duties, big pharma eliminates their main competitors, and assumes full control of the medicine and drug supply line from production to consumption, from birth to death and in respect of both over-the-counter sales paid for by the consumer, and all prescription drugs paid for by the U.K. Taxpayer via the N.H.S.

In addition, they are apparently seeking to extend their control over the actual prescribing by making it increasingly possible for their High Street shops to issue repeat prescriptions without “bothering” the patient's own doctor !

Unfortunately, the politicians who are supposed to make sensible and informed decisions on the nation's health and medical matters, are today just as much under the control of the psycho-pharmaceutical fraternity as are the prescribing doctors.

A situation which has also been engineered by that same psycho-pharm fraternity with their gradual introduction and infiltration into decision-making Civil Service positions of government Officials who are psychiatrists, pharmacologists and psychologists.

Margaret Thatcher's psycho-pharm prompted policy of “Care in the Community” was mainly responsible for the start of this, when her closing down of mental institutions and asylums was used as an excuse for finding work within government for those psychiatrists rendered unemployed by such closures.

My own view is that Theresa May has the potential to prove more perceptive than her female predecessor.

When she has had the time to settle in and start handling Brexit, I expect she will also see the necessity to also handle “The-exit” of psychiatric control from the Civil Service, and the reduction of the pharmaceutical role in the Health Service to appropriate proportions, driven not by taxpayer paid prescribed addiction and hypnosis, but by the more traditional and honourable principles of the British (not American) medical profession.

But more on that in a later post.

S.A.F.E. Is A Not-For-Profit Community Support Group Formed In 1975.

___________________________________________________________________

Giving Science A Bad Name

THOSE CHEMICAL GIANTS
 
WHO ARE DICTATING
 
ALL OUR FUTURES.

We are told by the main English language dictionaries and by various academics, that “science” is the study of the nature and behaviour of the “physical universe”, based on observation, experiment and measurement, plus the knowledge obtained and assembled by those methods, as well as the contents of any particular branch of such knowledge (e.g. medical science, physics, biology, cosmology, etc.).

However the term is also applied to any and nearly all other bodies of knowledge which are organised in a manner resembling that of the physical sciences but concerned instead with non-physical subjects (e.g. political science, psychiatry, sociology, economics and theology, etc.).

Arising out of research into the effects of multi-numerous substances on both human and animal bodies, minds and emotions, that major branch of science concerned with the composition, properties and reactions of substances - “Chemistry” - has become probably the most consumer influencing and controlling science of all, impinging as it so often does on the daily lives of nearly every individual, as well as on other sciences.

Food, clothing, shoes, cars, books, entertainment, holidays, furniture, houses, sports and hobbies, etc., etc., all employ marketing, promotion and merchandising, etc., to help them sell often and expensively enough to ensure a worthwhile business for their producers and distributors.

But only chemical based products (inc. alcohol & tobacco) have the power to irresistibly influence people physically, mentally and emotionally in good, but too often unhealthy, controlling and devastating ways.

And these influences arrive with us via a wide variety of routes and for a wide variety of different reasons.

Chemicals help produce very many of our foods, via fertilisers to make plants grow, herbicides to kill weeds and pesticides to kill insects. Unfortunately, because some growth promoting chemicals can also make human bodies grow, and some herbicides and pesticides can also poison and even kill human bodies, there have been, and still are, enough real wide ranging problems to promote continuing fears and arguments about our agricultural products.

These are not limited to plant growing, because chemicals used in rearing pigs, sheep, cattle, eggs, hens and other livestock are also often transmitted to the humans who eat them, so that the chemicals which give us great cuts of meat also too often help to give us great big ladies and gentlemen. So much so, that families and now doctors and politicians are getting worried about our size and weight.

Today, most of our foods and drinks (inc. water) depend on chemical filters, colourings, flavourings, preservatives, purifiers, texture enhancement additives and artificial fragrances and appetising aromas, etc., and these are sufficiently impinging on the health and condition of consumers to require close European and U.K. legislative control and limitation.

But in addition to the thousands of chemicals to found on supermarket shelves and in our drinking water, care must also be taken with other commonplace chemicals to be found in the home, at work, at school, at garages and filling stations, in sports and leisure situations, and a lot of chemistry increasingly dominates our industrial processes and personal and household cleaning procedures, and we even have some such chemicals starting addictive desires and being used to satisfy them.

Then especially, there are the pharmaceutical chemicals we are a thousand times a day on television, radio, hoardings, newspapers and by doctors and psychiatrists, etc., increasingly advised to put into our bodies as a means of enhancing our physical and mental / emotional lives in one way or another.

They are also often advised for pleasure, and we are all well aware of what effect drinking half a pint of whisky, gin or vodka will have on 95+% of the population.

But just a mere thimbleful of one of many common household cleaners, disinfectants, washing powders and even medications, etc., are poisonous enough to make us or our children extremely ill, or even kill, whilst many so-called medical anxiety treatments and physical painkillers can make involuntarily addicted slaves of MILLIONS of NHS patients at taxpayer expense.

Whilst chemistry has given us cleaner homes, smoother running cars, food which stays saleable longer, whiter teeth, better suntans and, via pharmaceuticals, a generally healthier and longer living world population, some pharmacists have also taken advantage of their products to wreak upon mankind some of the most devastating physical and mental conditions in the name of more chemical production, increasing sales, greater profits, bigger bonuses, larger dividends and greater control of individuals, plus their governments and their spending.

Pharmaceutical chemistry is the originating cause of ALL FORMS of substance addiction existing in the world today, whether legal, Illicit, licensed or prescribed – because no individual can ever become addicted to nicotine or an alcoholic or medical drug substance which they never actually take or use !

An addictive substance is the ultimate unique selling proposition available to any commercial operation in the world today, whether used by smugglers, terrorists and criminals to illegally addict juniors, teenagers, other adolescents and adults into daily usage of cannabis, skunk, amphetamines, heroin, alcohol or cocaine, etc., OR, used by pharmaceutical drug companies to ensure that National Health supported patients remain as consumers for life, by daily dosing them with various “symptom managing” addictive medical preparations, including painkillers, anti-psychotics, sedatives, hypnotics and many others.

And in the majority of increasing instances, the “symptoms” that the multi-daily doses of these patients are “treating”, are nothing more nor less than the extremely uncomfortable and unconfrontable “cold turkey” withdrawal effects created by the ever imminent demand for the next dose of their particular addictive substance.

There are various ways by which individuals can be persuaded to use, try or experiment with addictive drugs, but the most effective is to offer them initial “free of charge” dosages in order “to help” the victim solve some problem which they might consider they have.

Even the drug pusher at the school gate does this for the first one or two doses just to get a potential cash paying customer “hooked”. But psychiatrists promoting pharmaceutical drugs do this all the time as they utilise the NHS free prescription service to enrol more and more consumers onto their treatment listings.

They and their pharmaceutical paymasters know full well that any patient can be made into an addicted drug consumer for life, simply by making sure that they daily consume an addictive (and / or hypnotic) drug for a period of under one month.

JUST LIKE THAT ! As one popular comedian used to say - but this is no laughing matter.

It explains why the number of legally prescribed involuntarily addicted drug addicts paid for by the U.K. National Health Service is over six times higher than the number of criminally supplied il-legal addicts.

It explains why the number of NHS patients increases every year, because, whilst symptoms may be getting relieved, the underlying causes of those symptoms are not being cured.

It explains why, whilst NHS annual spending is increasing, there is not enough money available for A&E Services, nursing and doctor staffing, personnel training, beds, equipment, ambulances and buildings, etc., because most of the increased spending goes on the increasing supplies of NONE-CURE symptom management medication being prescribed and daily supplied to more and more involuntarily addicted patients.

MAKE NO MISTAKE.

Although blamed on inattentive, lazy over-prescribing doctors, this is deliberate psycho-pharmaceutical marketing policy, held in place by those organisations' failures to broadly offer and produce dosages of their addictive / hypnotic drugs in small enough units to permit the necessary low level “step-down” doses essential to achieving a relatively relaxed withdrawal from the clutches of daily addiction.

If small enough doses were a common part of the medical supply scene, every doctor in the country with patients on say the benzodiazepine ranges, would be able to move them gently and gradually onto smaller and smaller doses until they could totally withdraw with little or no adverse effect.

It might take 3 months or it might take 6, but at the moment a patient on 3 doses a day of 250 milligrams of one of the benzos or an opioid painkiller, would, instead of continuing for life on 750 milligrams a day, after those 3 or 6 months return to an addiction free life simply by changing prescription procedures and doses with the help of the pharmaceutical industry's small size dose offerings – IF AVAILABLE.

If that industry would willingly, urgently and inexpensively make the necessary small step-down dosages of all their addictive and / or hypnotic drugs regularly, widely and easily available, the world would know that they are not the avaricious, couldn't care less, patient damaging drug pushers they currently appear to be.

But to the degree that they continue to procrastinate about helping to solve this problem, politicians and public alike will know that current pharmaceutical policies are not accidental and not co-incidental, BUT are deliberate “enemy action” in the name of turnover and profit, and so respond accordingly.

Introducing legislation to make it illegal to produce a 100 mgm or larger tablet, capsule or other dose offering WITHOUT also equally offering a range of 2.5, 5, 10, and 50 mgm tablets, capsules or dosages at the same or at a proportionally lower cost, would put General Practitioners back in control of their patient's involuntary addictions, via normal prescribing practices.

CHOICE of dose sizes are the tools of effective prescribing, not only for the original medical condition, but also for the curing of involuntary addiction accidentally brought on by over-enthusiastic original prescribing.

Once such small step-down doses are fully available, legislation should also be introduced to penalise GPs who have an involuntarily addicted patient on their books for longer than say 6 or 9 months, because that doctor, WITH THE NECESSARY ADDICTION CURE DOSE SIZES AVAILABLE TO HIM, would be deliberately acting as a local drug pusher of free supplies, paid for by UK Taxpayers via the Exchequer.

All the benefits of abstinence from addiction are available to British GPs and their patients, but only if our politicians wake up to the facts of pharmaceutical life, AND LEGISLATE ACCORDINGLY.

For further info you may wish to phone: 01342 810151 any weekday

between 11.00am & 9.00pm.

Or e-mail keneck@btinternet.com.

S.A.F.E. Is A Not-For-Profit Community Support Group Formed In 1975.


_________________________________________________________________________________

The NHS's REAL Problem

LEAKED IN-PROGRESS PHARMACEUTICAL PROPOSALS FOR

THEM TO TAKE OVER CONTROL OF WORLD HEALTH SERVICES:

1. By making cash grants to universities, teaching hospitals and local medical schools, etc., constantly seek to control the education of the medical profession in the direction of palliative symptom management by prescription.
    
2. In order to ensure as much control as possible of local medical practice in respect of both physical and mental trauma, work together with prescribing psychiatrists to take as much advantage as possible of their established membership of that part of the medical profession having an adaptable technology.  Although they still practice Electro Convulsive (Shock) Treatment and a variety of brain operations, they are already experienced in heavy drug dosing procedures and because psychiatry is well established as a distinctive part of the medical profession, its practitioners are useful in influencing other parts of the profession – especially in respect of mental trauma, which we are now managing to get handled in G.P's surgeries on a drug prescription basis.
    
3. Seek to addict and hypnotise patients into daily compulsively and irresistibly demanding recommended “medication” in an effort to avoid the devastating “cold turkey” effects of withdrawing from that medication.
    
4. Blame, along with illegal drug supplies, the ill-advised and misinformed addicts for their addicted condition, rather than the legal pharmaceutical drug products recommended by medical prescribers. Label them as “misusers”.
   
   
5. Create the most advantageous drug “usage” circumstances.
    
6. Go on creating new uses for drugs, and new reasons for usage.
    
7. Seek to eliminate by criticism, ridicule, damning reports, black propaganda and condemnation, etc., all successful addiction cure procedures which do not utilise prescribed pharmaceutical products in their programmes.
    
8. By any and all means possible control all trade, political and public media into publishing only positive statements about pharmaceutical products and into the avoidance of any mention at all (OR of only negative statements) about non-pharmaceutical addiction cures.
    
9. By all means possible, ensure that Ministers and other political decision-makers both national and local have no contact with, and refuse communications from, any organisations and / or programmes capable of curing addiction without pharmaceutical drug prescribing.
    
10. Make full use of useful law - or seek to change it favourably.  
11.  
12.  
13. S.A.F.E. Is A Not-For-Profit Community Support Group Formed In 1975.
14. 
    
15. ___________________________________________________________

HOW THE WEB OF LIES IN THE U.K. ADDICTION SCENE STANDS IN THE WAY OF MASS RECOVERY TO LASTING ABSTINENCE.

It is only when you begin to examine the structure, the component parts and the vast quantity of deliberately false data circulating in the substance addiction sector, that you can start to comprehend WHY our country is Europe's leading drug disaster area.

As most of us are aware, there are four main groups of people dedicated to the profitable supply of addictive substances. 1) The alcoholic drinks industry, 2) the criminal and / or terrorist “recreational” drug smuggling cartels, 3) the pharmaceutical chemical industry, and of course 4) their “partners” in the drug prescribing fraternity (comprised mainly of misguided palliatively trained general practitioners, similarly trained medical staff and - psychiatric pseudo scientific market manipulators).

Other “interested parties” are our Civil Service officials plus their elected Ministers and MPs and, of course, the public in general – who are the main mass marketplace for addictive and hypnotic substances and which dangerously also includes most of all of the various types of suppliers.

Obviously the so-called “Drug Barons” foster the production and supply of drugs in order to line their pockets and for personal aggrandisement.

But so also do the alcoholic drinks producers and the pharmaceutical chemical companies, whilst ALL OF THEM, in one way or another, also take the fullest possible advantage of the addictive and hypnotic powers of their products in order to physically and mentally capture increasing numbers of inescapably loyal and profitably addicted customers.

The main difference between the Drug Barons and the other addictive drug suppliers is that “the others” usually pay their taxes and so are responsible for a major proportion of government income.

As a result, whilst governments continuously “make war” on Drug Barons, those same governments seem prepared to reach damaging accommodations with the alcohol trade and the pharmaceutical industry, based on clearly irrational advice from the psychiatric self-preserving drug pushers.

In view of the nature and the vast profit goals of the above main players in the addiction -v- abstinence game, it is hardly surprising to find that the main commodity circulating at each and every level in the addiction sector is MIS-INFORMATION in the form of advertising, innuendo, unproven statements, sound bites, guesses, opinions, propaganda, theories, beliefs, rumours, hopes, sales patter, speculation on research results and downright lies, etc.

This is gross deliberate mis-information upon which governments make policy decisions, plus often unintentionally repeated mis-information upon which individuals are led to decide to try or to use addictive substances.

The main gross lie fed to policy makers by the psycho-pharm fraternity is that - most forms of substance addiction are basically incurable !

Nothing could be further from the truth, but this lie arises for two main reasons: 1) the psycho-pharm fraternity cannot cure drug addiction by any form of prescribing, and, 2) they don't want to cure addiction, because curing addicts loses profitable consumers of pharmaceutical drugs and misleading psychiatric diagnostic services paid for by taxpayers.

Other lies are that individuals become addicted because they have “addictive personalities”, or because they “abuse” alcohol or “misuse” drugs. But the truth is that most drugs are addictive, so that, MOST IMPORTANTLY, you can never ever become addicted to a drug which you never take – because it is THE TAKING of the drugs WHICH CREATES ADDICTION !

So THE TRUE CREATORS OF ADDICTION ARE: The producers and distributors of alcohol, criminal recreational drugs, and prescription drugs, AND the lies they employ to persuade individuals to agree to start using drugs, PLUS the manipulated Ministers who naively encourage this.

But why do individual U.K. citizens decide or agree to ingest a substance they likely know is toxic and / or addictive ?

Because i) they are searching for a solution to what they consider is a chronic problem of MAJOR personal significance, and, ii) the biased professional and criminal marketing information, on which they are basing their decision or agreement to use or not use, is so often mis-leadingly slanted in favour of having them decide TO USE that supplier's drug to solve their problem.

Taking drugs is always agreed to in the HOPE of solving some problem.

The drug pusher at the school gates knows full well that if he gives a few free samples to a curious teenager, those samples will automatically convert that boy or girl into a willing and increasingly addicted paying daily customer, who might well soon be committing regular crimes to pay for his or her habit.

The busy General Practitioner hastily scribbling a prescription for Valium for a grieving patient may not have the same intentions as the school gate pusher, but that doctor's 7 to 10 day 3 times a day prescription does exactly the same job of creating an addict – this time paid for by our taxpayers.

The main instigators of all this are the psychiatrists working for and with the pharmaceutical companies. The psycho-pharm fraternity are not just merely aware that many of their products and prescriptions are addictive and also in some cases hypnotic – they deliberately exploit those damaging attributes to build their “captured clients list”, and to maximise their daily sales to those so called patients.

There are nearly 2.4 million INVOLUNTARILY ADDICTED PERSONS who are NHS “patients” in the U.K. But if they are “patients” - WHAT IS THE MEDICAL CONDITION FOR WHICH THEY ARE STILL BEING TREATED ? When they started three months, one year or ten years ago, their problem might then have been worry, grief, anxiety, depression, stomach-ache, toothache, headache or pain from a healing injury, etc., etc.

But in 99 out of a hundred cases those conditions will have cleared up in a few weeks and what they are now suffering from is not an illness or disorder, but merely “cold turkey” addiction withdrawal symptoms if they go too long without their continuously addicting daily or three times a day prescribed benzodiazepine or opioid based pain-killing drugs, etc.

In fact, iatrogenically (medically) caused involuntary addiction to pharmaceutical drugs is probably the single biggest health problem being daily “treated” or “managed” by the NHS today.

i.e a condition caused by doctors unnecessarily prescribing &/or over prescribing addictive drugs, with little regard for their habit and dependency forming powers, or the fact that the pharmaceutical industry offers little or no cure for the addictions they cause. This is mainly because, although a small dose step-down withdrawal procedure and cure is totally possible for millions of patients, they quietly avoid producing or supplying the necessary small doses because they want that highly profitable daily business to continue !

Disease and sickness “management”, habit “management” & behaviour “management” are all medical prescription procedures which pour multi-millions of pills, capsules, tablets, liquid doses, inhaled doses and injections into millions of patients every single day in an endeavour to palliatively control “symptoms” with drugs as an alternative to other possible procedures.

Such palliative so-called “patient management by prescription” is the pharmaceutical promoting set of procedures originated by Rockefeller and the Carnegie Institute a century ago via their Carnegie Foundation.

By showering hundreds of millions of dollars on U.S. medical schools, universities and teaching hospitals, in the form of research grants, across 160 such teaching institutions, the Foundation sought to dictate not what SHOULD BE taught, but what SHOULD NOT be taught.

Natural healing concepts were criticised and disparaged and started to disappear from study curricula, along with learning the role of allergies; studying what nutritional shortages and excesses could do; and students were told why one should be careful of using herbs, spices and other plants when carefully and hygienically produced pharmaceutical prescription medicines are “so much purer and reliable”, etc.

As a result, by 1927, the number of U.S. medical schools, colleges, universities and teaching hospitals had been halved, those which would not co-operate with the Rockefeller / Carnegie combine having been starved of grant support. (For a full description of what Rockefeller and the Carnegie Foundation did to U.S. and world medical practices read: “Censored HEALTH” by Gabor Lenkei, M.D.)

Since then, pharmaceutical companies in every developed country have adopted the same promotional concepts, squeezing out of medical training institutions any healing concepts and procedures which in any way invalidate or offer alternatives to the prescribing of pharmaceutical preparations.

As a result, our modern junior, and even many not so junior, doctors, G.Ps and Consultants are too often not even remotely aware that they and their technology are products of a rigid selection process geared to hidden commercial objectives. 

This long term manipulation of the whole of medical training towards nearly automatic prescription writing, today underlies all the problems apparent in the NHS as it mainly 'manages' symptoms instead of seeking causes & cures.

Furthermore, because we have a democratic political system which permits recently elected M.Ps (often without health experience or with professional qualifications in unrelated subjects) to govern our country, when it comes to medical matters they far too often have to learn from the doctors with manipulated training backgrounds or from government psychiatrists or from the commercially biased pharmaceutical representatives, whose American predecessors were responsible for manipulating doctors' training and whose board directors and marketing departments now TODAY knowingly use addiction as the world's ultimate and most effective sales tool.

As an automatic consequence, politicians and officials are broadly, although indirectly, under the controlling influence of the psycho-pharmaceutical fraternity who are thus allowed to go on merrily addicting and maintaining in an addicted state at least 2.4 million U.K. NHS patients at taxpayer expense.

When it comes to addictive usage by individuals trying to solve a personal or relationship problem (on the basis of bum “advice” from criminal pushers or from their peer group) we find a much smaller group, in descending order of number of users, of Cannabis (inc Skunk), Cocaine, MDMA, Amphetamine, Heroin or Methadone or Buprenorphine and NPS addicted users.

For the three well known reasons, 25 to 30% of these are essentially incurable, but the other 70 to 75% having daily tried to quit hundreds of times, and having just as regularly failed, are still desperate to quit.

So their problem is not willingness to quit. It is simply that they just don't know HOW and, when they are trained in self-help recovery techniques, the big majority of them will take themselves off their addiction and remain off for life - as has been proved at at least a hundred centres (including prison units) in 49 countries in the 50 years since 1966.

The main reason that the local police do not have sufficient resources to successfully handle local drug pushers is because our Government spends far too much money on fighting the so-called “War on Drugs” outside of Great Britain.

Why commit scarce resources to expensively taking actions in Colombia, Afghanistan, Mexico and numerous other distant foreign locations, when the pipeline of supplies which stretches from those countries to our own pubs,school gates and clubs, etc., can be more easily, effectively and inexpensively CUT by taking zero tolerance action much closer to the users being supplied by that pipeline.

By initially more or less ignoring the supply pipeline up to the local pusher or dealer, millions of £pounds plus millions of police, customs & excise hours can be saved and concentrated on the last link in the supply chain. i.e. THE PUSHER or DEALER who has to reveal him or her self in order to do business with the addicted user (who is most sensibly and usefully regarded as the addiction victim who should be rescued rather than criminalised).

The police target should be anyone who is found in possession of MORE THAN one dose or MORE THAN a single personal supply of one or more drugs.

Possession of one dose usually equals an addicted user who needs rescuing rather than criminalising.

Two doses and especially more, carried by the individual, or found in his/her car or at home, etc., usually equals “pusher” - the last link in the supply line – and he or she should be hit with every punishment available to the police, the prosecutors and the courts on a Zero Tolerance basis.

It doesn't matter if the supply line is one hundred, one thousand or one million miles long, the last link is to be found in every U.K. city, town or village close to the user AND CLOSE TO A LOCAL BRITISH BOBBY.

Furthermore, that last link can be identified by the user (the pusher's client), and if that user knows the police are not after him or her, it is not going to be all that difficult to get the users' co-operation, especially, if instead of being criminalised, the user is offered anonymity and effective treatment for their addiction – which 70 to 75% want desperately to quit.

Even pushers / dealers can be offered an opportunity to be cured if it is clear that he or she is selling drugs solely to support their own habit.

Particularly if they are prepared to give up their own immediate criminal supplier.

Working back down the supply line from the user towards the initial supplier works effectively only when the user is protected and rescued, and when government resources are diverted away from overseas spending and concentrated on local U.K. situations.

However, again this “rescue” plan is mainly defeated by mis-information.

Government decision makers are falsely convinced (by their own psychiatrists and a pharmaceutical industry which contributes so many lovely taxes) that addiction is incurable, and thus persuaded that addiction has to be “managed” by Opioid Substitution Therapy, etc., etc.

As a result, these mis-informed government policy makers are reluctant to attempt the curing of our millions of addicts – both voluntary and involuntary, and so will not listen to those non-psychiatric and non-prescribing organisations which can and do cure addiction and have done for half a century in numerous countries.

The spending of millions of Pounds, Dollars and Euros (which have each year been invested by the international psycho-pharm fraternity into propaganda since 1950 - to blacken, marginalise, disparage, ridicule, criticise, condemn and render unbelievable and ineffective those organisations which can regularly and effectively train addicts in self-help recovery from their addiction) has been extremely effective.

Effective in convincing Civil Servants and their elected governors in both Houses of Parliament that they should not meet or listen to those who claim and who can prove that they can in fact bring substance addicts to lasting relaxed abstinence.

Notwithstanding the easily provable fact that those who can bring a majority of drug addicts to lasting relaxed abstinence today have the largest and most successful addiction recovery training organisation in the world !

Today's deteriorating addiction situation in the United Kingdom is total proof of what uncaring profit and power mad booze producers, chemists and psychiatrists can do with addictive and hypnotic substances plus massive MIS-information, to create vast fortunes by letting equally unconcerned government have a share of their profits - in the form of tax revenue.

MAKE NO MISTAKE:

The vast majority of alcohol and drug addicts using every sort of addictive substance, badly want to quit their addiction for ever AND can be trained and helped to do so.

And because effectively recovering & rehabilitating addicts is a once only cost, that cost spending delivers massive government savings in what would have been the even more costly 40 addictive years which would have followed.

But not if MPs, Ministers & Officials continue to allow themselves to be bamboozled by booze producers, international pharmaceutical drug companies and pseudo-scientific psychiatrists !

All that those Ministers - whose Departments are effected by addiction - need to do to fully handle the U.K's drug and alcohol problems, is to speak with and listen to those organisations they have been persuaded by psychiatrists and pharmaceutical companies NOT to speak with and NOT to listen to !

The way in which the addiction problem spreads across several different Departments is of course part of the problem, as it permits Officials to easily pass the buck from their Department to another, which they all do.

Departments obviously the effect of the addiction scourge include: the Prime Minister's Office, the Cabinet Office, the Department for Communities and Local Government, the Home Office, the Ministry of Justice, the Law Officers and the Department for Work and Pensions, all of which will nevertheless blithely tell you that addiction is solely a Department of Health matter !

But on investigation one finds that all the Health Department's NHS does is to dole out free doses of addictive and hypnotic pharmaceutical drugs paid for by the taxpayers. (OST Methadone, Subutex, Disulfiram & benzos, etc.)

The NHS in no way attempts a cure of addiction, because they don't have a clue about how to procure lasting relaxed abstinence.

Nevertheless, the Government have placed NHS “local health consortia” in charge of commissioning local rehabilitation Providers, a majority of which struggle to deliver a 20% lasting recovery rate.

At the same time, they fail to commission those organisations which CAN DELIVER lasting relaxed abstinence in most cases, simply because of the effectiveness of psycho-pharm black propaganda in controlling opinion.

Wake up - Right Honourable Ladies and Gentlemen – and don't be embarrassed, because you are being manipulated by the world's experts !

For further information and the truth about how U.K. addiction can start to be handled before the end of this Parliament, you may wish to phone (01342) 810151 between 11.00am & 9.00pm any day, or e-mail keneck@btinternet.com.


S.A.F.E. Is A Not-For-Profit Community Support Group Formed In 1975.