Mad
Dog Psychiatry,
Still
Barking Up The Wrong Tree.
AND
NOW EVEN INVENTING MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS JUST TO SELL MORE ADDICTIVE
DRUGS !
FOREWORD:
It
is generally understood by the public, that “Ring-Fenced
National Health Spending” means that the amount of financing
allocated by the Chancellor of the Exchequer for the provision
of health care will not under any circumstances be diverted to
spending on any other services, nor be subject to economy cuts
which other areas of government spending might suffer.
However,
it seems it may also mean that the amount of financing allocated by
the Chancellor of the Exchequer for the provision of health care will
not be increased beyond that “ring-fenced” amount.
As
a consequence, INSIDE the National Health Service itself, within that
ring-fenced amount, the various types of NHS expenditure are
competing like mad with each other for an increasing share.
The
main areas of spending are: Premises, Ambulances & Other
Transport, Medical Equipment, Furniture, Furnishing & Fittings,
A&E Services, Staff Wages & Training, Doctors Salaries &
Professional Enhancement, Drugs
and Other Medication,
and Various Commissioned Services.
Since
the 1950s the main focus of both medical services and training has
been increasingly directed towards palliative medicine rather than
the permanent healing goals of earlier private medicine years.
Palliative
is essentially the comforting of patients by relieving their symptoms
whilst the body’s natural healing abilities get on with their work,
and can be effective in pleasing patients in some 50% of cases.
Unfortunately,
because the palliative care concept has also been developed into a
set of broadly applied “patient management” procedures, far
fewer
“cures” are being attempted or achieved, and an increasing
majority of patients are being treated on a long term, often daily
basis for months, years and even decades.
However,
whilst a cure obviously ends “treatment”, the “patient
management palliative care” concept serves only to year by year by
year increase the huge numbers of patients still “in
treatment”.
As
a result, Drugs & Medication increasingly take the lion’s share
of spending increases, to the detriment of Medical Staffing, A&E
Services and other spending, and this applies especially to inventive
emotional and MENTAL DISORDER PRESCRIBING.
Lord McNair, Westminster
THE
DELIBERATE CREATION OF
ADDICTIVE DEMAND
In
examining the mental medication situation we need to remember that
any and all commercial ventures continuously seek to expand their
turnover, profit, bonuses and dividends year after year, and to do
this their
marketing and sales departments constantly endeavour by nearly any
means possible to pump more and more of their products into the
society:
a) By
CONTINUOUSLY EXPANDING their list of regular patients for, and
consumers of, their drug products,
b) By
CONTINUOUSLY INCREASING their supply of drugs and medication to, and
turnover with, each consuming patient and customer,
c) By
maximising their profit margin on each drug and medication supply
transaction,
d) By
ensuring full and prompt receipt of payment, from government, and,
e) By
seeking to RETAIN THEIR EXISTING “valuable” CONSUMERS, at
all costs.
So,
it is not
surprising that pharmaceutical producers constantly strive to SUPPLY
MORE AND MORE PSYCHO-MEDICALLY PRESCRIBED DRUGS TO GROWING NUMBERS OF
PATIENTS FOR MORE & MORE SO-CALLED “MENTAL ILLS &
DISORDERS”, whilst ensuring that payments are safely guaranteed by
the State (i.e. paid by the taxpayer) and at the same time also
ensuring
that the psycho-pharms lose no existing consumers by letting them be
cured.
In
addition
to the sales tools which other industries use to achieve these profit
goals, the pharmaceuticals have developed five spurious extra
strategies (unique to chemical supply and marketing) to help them
reach their objectives:
1) BECAUSE
A CURED PATENT IS A LOST PROFITABLE CONSUMER, THEY HAVE LARGELY
ABANDONED THE IDEA OF “CURING” AND INSTEAD HAVE SUBSTITUTED
“PATIENT MANAGEMENT” ON A DRUG PRESCRIPTION “TREATMENT” BASIS
GIVING RISE TO:
i) DISEASE,
ILLNESS AND SICKNESS MANAGEMENT:
multi-daily or weekly prescribing for bronchitis, depression,
anxiety, arthritis, asthma, influenza, diabetes, insomnia, migraine,
stomach, heart & fake mental problems, etc., etc.
ii) HABIT
MANAGEMENT:
dosing of addicts each day, 365 days a year, with disulfiram or
Opioid Substitution “Treatment”. i.e. Prescribing for alcohol
and / or drug addicts other addictive products such as methadone and
Subutex,
iii) BEHAVIOUR
MANAGEMENT:
by daily prescription of
invented and / or exaggerated youth and older age mental conditions
and / or DSM-V so-called “Mental Disorders” such as ADHD, ADD,
SAD, Depression and Anxiety, etc., etc.
2) Based
on psycho-medico prescribing, they take advantage of the well
known to them
HYPNOTIC and / or ADDICTIVE NATURE of a large proportion of their
products
to promote and maintain a chemically induced HABITUAL DEMAND from
their consumers,
i.e.
THEY ACTUALLY ADDICT (AND EXPOSE TO HYPNOTIC COMMAND) THEIR PATIENTS
– in Direct and Total Opposition to the Government’s 2010
“REDUCING DEMAND” Strategy !
3) In
order to ensure full on time payment for their products and services,
they have persuaded successive governments that taxpayers should fund
these “treatments” rather than addicts themselves, thus
commandeering (because of less and less cures) an ever increasing
proportion of ring-fenced health budgets for drug
medication supply
– to the detriment of other N.H.S. spending
on equipment, A&E services, premises, ambulances, staffing,
training, wages and salaries, etc.
4) To
divert attention away from their own self-styled “ethical”
addictive substances SUPPLY activities, they have persuaded national
governments around the world to “wage war” on competing illicit
drugs suppliers.
Easily
done, because these are mainly criminal and terrorist growers,
smugglers and hijackers of a wide range of addictive chemical
products. A war which has never actually been started, because it
should logically be waged against DEMAND - by curing consumers.
A
war which officially, expensively and exclusively attacks SOLELY
and ONLY
NON-PHARMACEUTICAL industry drug supplies and suppliers,
and,
5) By
also establishing, developing and supporting the most sophisticated
system of PR and lobbying operations to be found in commercial
endeavour on Earth. i.e. A planetary-wide so-called “independent”
fraternity of service-user groups, charities, observers, drug
advisers, commentators, policy “commissions”, associations,
magazines, seminars, conferences, standing committees, journalists,
conventions, researchers,
psychological symposia, action teams, family counsellors and
psychiatric prescribers, etc., etc., – all with three goals
directly or indirectly in view:
i) To
maximise the production and sale of pharmaceutical drugs of all types
- BY
MAXIMISING THEIR CONSUMPTION,
ii) To
maximise the proportion of such supplies paid for by government from
taxpayer funds, and,
iii) To
ensure that any alternative successful
systems of training, cure, diet, drills, routines, exercise and / or
rehabilitation, etc., are ridiculed, marginalised, black-balled and
side-lined out of existence, just in order to eliminate ANY and ALL
rehabilitative competition which is effective enough to replace
prescription drug medication by delivering a bona fide life-long cure
or viable means of recovery from addiction.
It
is not surprising to discover that a similar crafty usage of the
intoxicating properties of their products is also practised in the
licensed drinks trade, the other massive international purveyor of
addictive products.
They
know the quicker you can get a few glasses of alcohol into a drinker,
the quicker will disappear his judgement, his responsibility level,
his inhibitions and his ability to assess when he has “had enough”.
In
addition, he may well spend more on “drinks all round” !
When
athletes use chemical substances to enhance their “sports”
performance, the whole world shouts “CHEATS”, condemns them and
bans them from further participation.
But
when the pharmaceutical industry and the alcohol producers use their
own chemical substances (addictive drugs and drink) to enhance their
“commercial” performance, our short sighted tax grabbing
Government shouts “GREAT”.
Because
the Chancellor fails to recognise that police, probation officers,
hospitals, town and county councils and others are all going to spend
the bulk of that chemically and alcoholically produced tax income on
funding:
FIRST
the provision of those drugs to millions of British citizens, and,
SECOND
on funding the cleaning up of the town centres, the handling of the
crimes, the injuries, the other problems increasingly caused by
addicts, and all the problems with which ever increasing numbers of
voters are now ever increasingly fed-up.
PAVLOV’S
DOGS, VARIOUS RATS
AND
MODERN PSYCHIATRY
Pavlov,
the Russian physiologist best known for his experiments with dogs and
his relating of their behaviour to that of human beings, nevertheless
proved he was far from stupid when, he was awarded a Nobel Prize for
Physiology / Medicine in 1904.
What
was
stupid however was International Psychiatry’s nearly immediate
adoption of the idea that rats, dogs and
Man
are all governed by the same patterns of behaviour AND that our meat
brains are the ultimate controlling factor in all our lives.
One
can understand neurology, that branch of physiology which deals with
the brain and its connections to the body, being totally interested
in the workings of the brain, and even wanting to be able to claim
that the brain – as the mysterious high point of human body
structure
– is physiology’s most vital component, and their science
therefore probably the most important to mankind.
But
psychiatry is supposed and pretends to be dealing with the
MIND of Man,
insofar as it concerns itself with mental matters and mental health –
“psyche” meaning mind or spirit – NOT body, NOT structure.
So
why does psychiatry
rely so fully on physical
body components such as brain, and the behaviour patterns of dogs and
rats in their repeatedly failed attempts to predict Man’s mental
capacity and improve his so-called “mental health” ?
From
psych Dr Chris Evans’s authoritative “DICTIONARY OF THE MIND,
BRAIN AND BEHAVIOUR”, we learn:
”The
trouble with psychiatry today is that it is still without a working
theory, not just of the mind but also the disturbed mind. Even a
definition of “mental Illness” is not easy to come by, so perhaps
it is not surprising that to this date psychiatric methods have
inevitably been of a hit or miss variety”
!
So
the answer to the question in the last but one paragraph on why does
psychiatry rely so much on “Brain” and “Animal Behaviour”
patterns, is: “Because
psychiatry has no fundamental theory or knowledge of the workings of
the human mind, and so - 110 years after Pavlov’s dogs - is still
barking up the wrong tree”
!
If
psychiatry was on the right track, and had progressed over the last
century as fast and as far as physical medicine has, we would today
be working with viable cures for neurosis, psychosis, paranoia,
addiction, allergies, depression, Alzheimer’s disease and other
forms of Dementia, and, in the same way as we have improved the
physical health of billions, we would also have improved their mental
wellbeing and intelligence.
Instead,
left to psychiatry, the “mental” and “spiritual” facets of
mankind have been so distorted that in despair, students of physical
medicine have been trying to find within their own limited material
sphere some reason for emotional and behavioural factors which are
and remain elusive solely because they lie completely outside their
normal physical frame of reference.
THE WRONG IDEA THAT MAN IS MADE UP
ONLY
OF A FLESH AND BLOOD “BODY & BRAIN”.
The
“right tree”, which has been neglected mainly because of the lack
of identification of the true purpose and function of ”the brain”,
is the recognition that Man is comprised of “Body and Brains, plus
a Genetic Entity, two Minds and a Spiritual Entity”.
Far
from being able to learn about man from animal behaviour, the reverse
is the case.
Whilst, even in the absence of accurate and reliable
communication between the species, animal
behaviour can nevertheless be observed, studied, analysed and
hypothesised to a remarkable degree (to the benefit of both Man and
the animal kingdom), human
behaviour is able TO
BE LOGICALLY DISCUSSED in depth with each individual human organism
and so, in addition to observed reality, a subjective reality on each
being, plus his or her life and history, can be obtained from which a
more detailed view of both human and animal life can be derived.
From
this we learn that THE
PURPOSE AND FUNCTION
OF THE BRAIN IS PRETTY STRAIGHT-FORWARD, and appears to be the same
for animals as it is for Mankind.
A
brain is probably the most sophisticated electronic “switchboard”
in existence. Like other switchboards, it doesn’t think, it
doesn’t compute, it doesn’t make plans and it doesn’t make
decisions, etc. But most psychs like to have us “believe” it
does !
It
is a uniquely programmed message handling, relay and delivery system,
mainly located in the head of a flesh and blood organism, with
sub-brain like relays throughout the body.
Whilst
a)
on the one side the brain relays communications TO the body and
receives perceptions FROM the body via the endocrine and other
physical communication systems, b)
on the other side the brain receives its instructions FROM the minds
/ entities, and sends perceptions TO the minds / entities by more
arcane procedures. i.e. non-physical media.
As
soon as the existence and functions of the minds / entities are
recognised, the function and operation of the brain moves into focus
and a clear understanding of all those phenomena detected by
neurologists and other brain researchers becomes rather obvious.
The
phenomena seen by brain scanning and other scientific observation of
electronic or chemical activity in the brain are not
caused
by decision-making, or any form of imaginative invention, or problem
solving or goal setting.
Those
are all high level mental / spiritual functions, whereas the job of
the brain is a highly sophisticated, accurate, near instantaneous and
largely automatic relay of data from a mental / spiritual being to
achieve that being’s goals in the physical universe, whilst also
concurrently and near simultaneously relaying back to the mental /
spiritual being, data from the physical universe on which to further
compute, decide and act.
WHICH
BRINGS US TO THE “MINDS” AND THE “ENTITIES”:
All
animal forms, including that of Man, can rather straightforwardly be
shown to have some form of “Reactive Mind”, which reacts to the
needs of, and dangers and threats to, bodily survival by taking
avoiding actions based on unconsciously recorded memories of previous
historical experiences of similar earlier damaging events in that
being’s current or earlier lifetime(s).
But
only Man also demonstrates possession of an “Analytical Mind”
capable of “comparison” and “differentiation”, etc., in
addition to the very limited reactive “identification” capability
of animals.
Man
and animals can be shown to have a physically managing Genetic Entity
(G.E.), which, as the guardian of the DNA blueprint and instigator
thereof, arrives with the about to be developed organism at
conception in order to quality control production of the
“under-construction” child and, after the birth, to ensure
regular correct functioning, maintenance, repairs, nourishment and
eventually a new phase of bodily reproduction of those genetic
physical characteristics.
It
is not therefore surprising to be able to observe in animals a
similar set-up with the Genetic Entity guiding the organism on a
strictly physical survival path through the environment via its
perceptions and Reactive Mind and further on via reproduction.
But
on top of these components which appear to be common to all living
organisms, because researchers can actually TALK
to Man it is relatively easy to also detect and reveal both a
“Spiritual
Entity”
senior in performance to the G.E. plus
an Analytical
Mind
senior in computational potential to the Reactive Mind.
Furthermore,
work with human beings reveals, 1)
in a majority of cases, not only that the Spiritual Entity can - both
at its discretion and involuntarily - be safely separated from the
body without damage to either, and 2)
that the Spiritual Entity joined the Body – not at conception –
but only shortly before birth, and basically usurped the Genetic
Entity’s body controlling position and took over as the Chief
Executive Officer of that human organism.
There
is no reason the Genetic Entity should resent or resist this
takeover, because, as
long as the
physical organism
is comfortably and safely surviving,
the G.E. has little concern about what the organism is doing, what it
is being used for, where it is and how that survival is being
achieved, etc.
In
addition, the G.E. seems aware that the controlling Spiritual Entity
also in general has the survival of the Body as a continuing goal
and, in any event knows that, via the Reactive Mind, the G.E. has the
over-riding power in physical emergency situations, to limit or even
totally suspend the Spiritual Being’s executive control of the
organism.
In
addition, now proven by some, but not all, of Earth’s residents,
the Spiritual Entity shows itself to be an immortal entity quite
separate from the human body it occupies, with experience of earlier
lifetimes and the ability to energise a human body throughout life.
In
fact “dead” is the condition a human body moves into when its
“Spiritual Entity” decides it is now time to permanently
move out and move on - to take a new body - to re-incarnate, or to
return to purely spiritual living.
So
what we are here calling a “Human Being” is comprised of 1) the
Body, 2) the Brain (or Brains), 3) the Reactive Mind, 4) the Genetic
Entity, 5) the Analytical Mind, and 6) a Spiritual Entity or Being
which is what most people and most world religions normally name as “soul” or “spirit”,
and which of course is not only the driver and navigator through life of each
live Human Being, but also religiously understood as "the Soul of Man" - his very essence.
(And
in fact it appears that that which we know as a “Human Being” is
no more nor less than a Human Body taken over shortly before birth
and energised by a Spiritual Being in a parasitic combination, thus
giving the Spiritual Being - during lifetime after millions of
lifetimes - the greatest possible variety of physical games to play.
Which seems not unreasonable, because “VARIETY IS” universally
claimed to be “THE SPICE OF LIFE” ! )
Both
the human Reactive Mind and the Analytical Mind have the ability to
make use of the Brain to relay commands to the Body plus the ability
to receive sense perceptions from the environment via the body.
During
“normal” everyday operating conditions, the Analytical Mind acts
as the servant of the Spiritual Being which is using and giving
direction to the particular body it currently occupies.
Whilst
the Spiritual Being determines goals and imagines and decides on
future actions and directions, on the Spiritual Being's instructions
the Analytical Mind computes effort and other requirements, and
relays spiritually approved commands to the brain for the brain to
relay to the body and to have implemented by the body in the local
environment.
(N.B.
Whilst neurologists and physiologists often speak of “brains” in
the plural to include the brain-like relay stations within the body,
because all one’s “brains” work in concert, further reference
herein will be to the singular element.)
The
brain also accepts communications from the physical environment via
the body’s perceptive senses, and “relays” these via the
being’s Mind(s) and to the Spiritual Being as data on which to
postulate a future and on which to compute decisions and future
activity in the game of survival in this lifetime on Earth.
During
physical “emergencies” (i.e.
when the body’s survival or wellbeing is threatened by similar
historical (not
genetic)
circumstances stored in the Reactive Mind from earlier life similar
events)
in the name of physical survival the Reactive Mind has the ability to
over-ride the requirements of the Spiritual Being / Analytical Mind,
so that the Reactive Mind may have the body take the same sort of
immediate evasive survival actions as one might observe in an animal
under attack from threatening factors in its immediate environment.
i.e.
Escape, run, hide, fight, physically survive at all costs,
irrespective of what the Spiritual Being may otherwise wish at that
time. Because from the G.E’s dedicated physical survival viewpoint
the aspirations and goals of BOTH the G.E. and the Spiritual Being
ALL FAIL if the physical organism is allowed to perish.
Here,
is the huge variable in human behaviour, when the demands of
continuing physical
existence AT ANY PRICE, are allowed by physical nature to take
precedence over the goals of the Spiritual Being’s this lifetime
current goals and intentions for that body.
It
is therefore not really surprising that we have so many wild and even
damaging decisions and actions in the fields of psychology and
psychiatry, when those professions have such false ideas about the
Brain and the Mind(s), and no idea whatsoever of the existence of the
governing Spiritual Being - which is you !
But
in addition to false ideas based on poor, incomplete, disproven or
ancient science (and
mainly as a result of these negative factors), into
today’s “Mental
Health” arena has increasingly been entered theories and practices
dictated by purely avaricious commercial goals and power and profit
targets.
MENTAL
HEALTH HAS BECOME PROBABLY THE MOST DISTORTED SUBJECT IN THE WORLD
BECAUSE IT HAS BEEN DELIBERATELY CONFUSED BY THE PSYCHO-PHARM
FRATERNITY PURELY FOR COMMERCIAL REASONS.
In
fact, today, psychiatry’s chief function is as the marketing arm of
the pharmaceutical industry, whilst the training of medical doctors
and G.Ps has been perverted to making them mainly salesmen for the
prescribed products of the pharmaceutical industry.
For
instance, by far the largest group of substance addicts in the world
are those medical patients who have been involuntarily addicted to
pharmaceutical drugs (which
they might
just possibly have found comforting for a very short period)
but have been forced into addictively continuously wanting, by a)
lack of accurate diagnostic testing, b) failure to even try to
identify nutritional deficiencies and allergies to a wide variety of
everyday environmental factors or c) even occasionally by just
careless, lazy or time-saving unnecessary medical dosing or
over-prescribing.
Many
in the medical profession plead that this is accidental, brought on
by a big overload of work and patients and a shortage of staff and
resources.
But
when closely examined, it becomes clear that the “marketing
strategies” of the psycho-pharmaceutical fraternity, based on the
same expansionist goals as other businesses, are by far the main
driving force behind the drugging of more and more and more of our
population - at taxpayer expense.
INVENTING
MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS
FOR PROFIT
EXPANSION MOTIVES
Physical
Health conditions can quite often be as plain as the nose on your
face.
Far
less obvious are Mental Health and / or emotional conditions, which
are generally known to the public only by some “label” or
psychiatric “title” attached to a common natural behaviour
symptom or condition, by a psychiatrist or some other physician under
psychiatric guidance.
A
symptom is an observable or detectable reaction to, or result of,
some cause. It is NOT
the problem, it
is as a result of the problem.
For
example, water dripping though a ceiling is a sign something is
wrong. It is a symptom which says: “We
have a problem”,
but doesn’t say what it is.
Is
the water dripping because a radiator is leaking, because a pipe has
burst, because a ball-cock has stuck, because a tap has been left
running, because someone has spilt something, because a toilet is
blocked and so is overflowing, because someone has left a window wide
open and it’s raining or because the roof is leaking ?
Whilst
you might put a bucket under the drip to catch the water, until you
go upstairs and start investigating the cause, you really haven’t
any idea how to permanently cure the problem.
And
it is just the same with numerous emotional symptoms and some
physical reactions.
Is
John sneezing because he has a cold, because the atmosphere is full
of dust, because he is allergic to cats, dogs, shampoos or hay ? Is
it the high pollen count or because at age 12 he passed out in a
smoke filled room and sneezing kept him breathing so that his
Reactive Mind now reacts to smoking?
Is
William’s migraine due to the temperature, the lack of fresh air,
the cold he is developing, the fur collar on the new coat he is
wearing, his lack of vitamin “X”, or the bang on his head when he
fell off his bike at age 7 onto a newly laid asphalt road, the smell
of which – stored in his Reactive Mind – now re-stimulates his
bad headache whenever hot weather softens the tar on the roads ?
There
are literally thousands and thousands of animal, vegetable, mineral
and other natural and synthetic chemical substances to which human
beings can have allergic reactions, as well as unexplained until now,
reactions to birds, fish, trees, plants, food, drinks, flowers and .
. . .
you name it !
There
are a wide variety of vitamins and minerals, a shortage of which, or
too much of which, can create weird physical and, what looks like but
isn’t, mental phenomena in the form of undiagnosed symptoms.
And
today these undiagnosed but DEFINITELY NOT MENTAL symptoms are the
happy hunting ground for psychiatrists looking for consultancy work,
and pharmaceutical companies looking for new customers for whom their
psychiatric “partners” can prescribe their often addictive
“mental health” medications.
In
fact, doctors’ training college lecturers and most psychiatrists
are doing the prescribing or are coaxing / manipulating local G.Ps
and doctors into prescribing pharmaceutical products to handle
symptoms,
INSTEAD OF LOOKING FOR THE UNDERLYING CAUSE AND HANDLING IT TO A CURE
– more often based on a change of diet, avoidance of some allergy
or the handling of a simple personal situation.
Unlike
physical disorders (which
can be identified and diagnosed by listening through a stethoscope,
looking at the patient, x-raying, feeling for bruises or breaks,
checking weight and measuring, etc., etc.) because
mental health disorders are seldom diagnosed by first examining and
testing the patient for allergies or nutritional deficiencies, but
instead are decided according to descriptions of symptoms given in
various psychiatric text books,
(so
that psychiatrists have found they can even prescribe the “right
medication” over the telephone or by e-mail over the Internet.)
In
other words, far from seeking the cause of an observed symptom by
thoroughly testing for evidence of allergies or nutritional problems
which can in this bio-chemical society be likely in at
least
half of cases, the main “time-saving” action today is to
prescribe a drug which will hopefully eliminate that symptom. (Not
unlike prescribing a strong pain-killer whilst doing nothing to
discover and re-set a broken arm or leg !)
i.e. The symptom is PAIN – so therefore – kill it !
Take,
for instance, one of the well known “mental illnesses” listed in
the infamous American Psychiatric Association’s: “Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (the DSM)”.
You
do not have to be a psychiatrist or other doctor to recognise “SOCIAL
ANXIETY DISORDER (SAD)” which is what any person would normally
call being “SHY”. (i.e.
doesn’t like and / or resists meeting other people, especially the
opposite sex.)
This
could be because the shy person knows he or she has bad breath or a
strong body odour. It could be because they are allergic to other
peoples’ body odour or after-shave or perfume. It could be
because, having often been beaten in childhood by an angry father or
mother, they are subsequently afraid of any similar father or mother
type of person.
It
could be because the person to whom they are being introduced is a
dog or cat lover, and the shy one is allergic to those animals and so
reacts to the hairs carried on the other person’s clothing.
In
fact, in a majority of fully and properly tested cases an amazing
range of reasons for the condition can be found, the vast bulk being
physically based and definitely not
mental.
But
testing takes time. Testing costs money. Testing needs scientific
knowledge and equipment. Testing often leads to a cure and a lost
customer, and insecure psychiatrists (of which there are
unfortunately many) are even afraid that recommending testing is an
admittance that they don’t really know their job !
Handy
books of symptoms are therefore of great help and comfort to them
because when confronted with a symptom or report of a symptom, they
can confidently turn to their book of symptoms and find a recommended
drug or other medication prescription with minimum waste of their
costly time.
BUT
HOW WAS THE LIST OF SYMPTOMS AND THEIR RECOMMENDED PRESCRIBING PUT
TOGETHER IN A SALES MANUAL ?
By
listening to what the patients had to say ?
NO.
Because they were not there to be consulted.
By
testing ?
NO.
Because testing is done on individuals to reveal the causes of THEIR
particular symptoms, and so cannot be generalised.
By
proposing a description for a new mental disorder, and then voting on
it ?
First,
they could agree with their pharmaceutical suppliers the “best”
drug or other medication to prescribe for that symptom.
Second,
they could then decide on the period and cost of such prescribing and
any associated residential care or other “treatment”.
Third,
they could then start collecting prescribing statistics for that new
“disorder”, to determine if it would be worthwhile to go on
including it in their listings.
Fourth,
this would permit them to put together scales of charges for various
residential and non-residential purposes, including insurance claims
against health policies and of course prescribing charges.
And
finally,
they could put all their symptomatic “mental disorders” together
in a beautifully bound manual which sells for £75.00 (over 125 U.S.
$dollars) to millions of psychiatrists, doctors, clinics, hospitals,
universities, libraries and governments around the world at a huge
profit every time they change something, “discover” new mental
illnesses in order to expand the influence, turnover, earnings and
profit of their profession as well as that of the pharmaceutical
companies, or, just because someone thought of a new “mental
disorder” they might all be able to start earning money on.
But,
all they are selling is the
imaginative opinions
of just a few members of the American Psychiatric Association. And
the people paying in most countries are that nation’s taxpayers.
Another
well known example is: “ATTENTION DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER
(ADHD)” for which Ritalin, Prozac and a range of other drugs are
prescribed nearly every day of the year to thousands of teenage and
younger schoolchildren. In
fact, from a marketing viewpoint the earlier they can be started the
better, because the younger they start the longer they are likely to
be pharmaceutical consumers.
Not
“paying attention” and “too active” are the basis of this so
called “mental disorder”.
So,
why are they not paying attention ?
Because,
when you have 30 pupils in a class, you usually have 10 slow ones, 10
fast ones and 10 the teacher considers “normal”, and on whom the
speed of the lessons is therefore focussed.
Those
with so-called “attention deficit” – when tested – are found
to be mainly from the slow pupils who are just being left behind, but
can also be from the amongst the fast group who got the point being
made immediately and so need no longer pay further attention.
But
why are some labelled “hyper-active” ?
Because,
bored by the slow speed of the lesson delivery, many fast pupils feel
the need for introducing some “action”
with which to occupy their time until the rest of the class catches
up. The action they choose is seldom lesson orientated, and so is
normally disruptive.
Because
of the strain on resources which the splitting of classes into slow,
medium and fast streams would impose, when consulted, the
psycho-pharms took the opportunity to prescribe regular dosing with
a variety of mainly habit forming drugs leading
to the likely creation of pharmaceutical or other drug addicts for
life.
Before
we look at more of the quite ridiculous “mental disorders” voted
into the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual by a show of hands, when
the World Health Organisation (the WHO) was putting together its own:
“International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related
Health Problems (the ICD)”, because psychiatry was claiming to be
the experts in prescribing for Mental Diseases the WHO were persuaded
to essentially incorporate the whole of the DSM content into the ICD,
thus extending psychiatry’s grip on mental health diagnosing and
prescribing outside the psychiatric domain and into and across more
and more health sectors.
All
of which further extends the selling of the unproven, untested and
greedy, often ridiculous opinions of just a few members of the
American Psychiatric Association to nations around the world. Mainly
because the PR teams and lobbyists working on behalf of psycho-pharm
vested interests have managed with black propaganda, lies, ridicule
and defamation, to deny other real and effective mental health
sciences any access to government Ministers and / or Civil Servants
in many countries.
Especially
countries like Germany, France and the U.K., where the export sales
results of their pharmaceutical industries are important to their
economy and especially to their national tax collection departments.
But
let’s look at a few more so-called “mental
health problems”
being diagnosed solely on symptoms, with no adequate testing but
nevertheless prescribed for at every possible opportunity.
Like
every good work of fiction, the “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders” is copyrighted, so we are all barred from
giving direct quotes therefrom without acknowledging their source.
As
a result, each of the above plus the following quoted “mental
disorders”, are fully acknowledged as deriving from the DSM, and
you should note that they have been published to alert all of us to
the fact that, IN THE OPINION OF some
of the members of the American Psychiatric Association, these
conditions should be designated as “mental illnesses / disorders”
and are therefore appropriate reasons for the daily prescribing of
mental health medication and other “mental
health interventions”
including brain operations, electric shocking, long term heavy
drugging and, in some countries, separating children from their
parents.
DEFINITIONS
FROM:
the
DIAGNOSTIC & STATISTICAL MANUAL of MENTAL DISORDERS V:
PSYCHOTIC:
“The
term psychotic
has historically received a number of different definitions, none of
which has achieved universal acceptance.”
The
above is of course another way of saying “We cannot agree”, or
even that “We don’t
know”, but after citing a few of the various “different
definitions” the DSM settles on the following double definition:
“Finally,
the term has been defined conceptually as a loss of ego boundaries or
a gross impairment in reality testing.”
Which,
we are informed, even if one understands these two meanings, still
doesn’t make sense of one of the cornerstones of modern psychiatric
terminology.
LEARNING
DISORDERS:
Every
experienced teacher knows that in every classroom there are roughly
1/3rd
of the pupils who are quick learners, another third who are “normal”
and another group who are slow or backward.
Today,
if a student is a member of this latter group, they are now
considered by psychiatrists as mentally disordered and thus
candidates for some form of “mental health therapy”, which mainly
turns out to be daily prescribed drug medication, most forms of which
can be habit forming or addictive. Millionaire film star Tom Cruise
was in this group labelled “Dyslexic” but, fortunately was never
drugged.
Proper
tutoring in language and the “barriers to study” (which are the
main reasons for Dyslexia and Slowness”) soon pulled him out of
this and set him on the road to what he is today.
READING
DISORDER, MATHEMATICS DISORDER AND DISORDER OF WRITTEN EXPRESSION:
Are
all indicated as forms of Learning Disorder qualifying for drug
treatment, rather than giving consideration to the possibility that
there might be something wrong with the teaching methodology or some
personal or family problems in individual cases like Tom Cruise’s.
40
years ago research showed that there can be 3 “barriers to study”
which can produce the symptoms of dyslexia or backwardness in pupils
if not handled.
This
revolutionised study results in various private teaching
organisations, but was seldom if ever allowed even to be considered
or trialled by those State schools run by heads, teachers and board
officials educated in teachers training colleges, where tuition is
based on psychological and social science principles introduced after
World War II in many countries by American & Canadian
psychiatrists.
This
was another part of the American Psychiatric Association strategy to
pull the population into mental health at the youngest ages possible,
and rather than going through the rest of DSM IV, if readers would
like a free DVD detailing numerous examples of psych drug prescribing
only to relieve symptoms, you should phone 01342 810151.
DOCTORS, GPs AND PHYSICIANS ARE ALL UNKNOWINGLY
THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY'S MAIN TEAM OF SALESPEOPLE.
TRAINED TO MEDICATE, RATHER THAN CURE !
If
those “in-the-know” were asked to recommend just one
authoritative book on the truth about health services throughout the
world today, it would probably be: ISBN Number: 978-90-817388-6-6:
“(Censored)
Health”,
by Dr Gabor Lenkei M.D., Hungary’s best known medical practitioner,
researcher and writer on why wasteful and mainly ineffective
prescription drugs are increasingly the biggest part of National
Health spending in most countries – including the United Kingdom.
Lenkei
is not alone in trying to bring public and political attention to the
shocking manipulation (by
the psycho-pharmaceutical fraternity)
of our Department of Health, the National Health Service, the
Chancellor of the Exchequer and our over-burdened taxpayers.
Dr
Matthias Rath’s numerous, reliable and respected publications
should also be consulted, along with the researches of Nobel
Laureates Albert Szent-Gyorgyi and Linus Carl Pauling, the highly
respected and validated writings on nutrition of Michael Colgan and
Adelle Davis, the acknowledged as accurate statistical and financial
research of Janos Drabik, the work on cancer cures of Edward G.
Griffin and the thousands of honest scientists and researchers who
have dared to raise their heads above the parapet and face the
withering fire from psycho-pharm lobbyists and front-organisations
greedily battling for more and more control and bigger and bigger
shares of massive National Health spending throughout the world.
Dr
Lenkei is also not alone in expressing his gratitude to L. Ron
Hubbard for his work on ethics and a “Code of Honour” not just
for professionals but also for honest living, which Lenkei says,
helped him to use his medical training and practice to expose the
racketeering of the pharmaceutical industry and the part played by
psychiatrists as that industry’s main marketing arm.
In
his book: “(Censored)
Health”,
Dr Lenkei reveals why he chose that title to expose the deliberate
re-orientating of the whole medical profession away from healing /
curing and towards the MANAGING WITH DAILY MEDICATION of all forms of
illness, sickness, disease, addiction and behaviour. i.e. long term
- even lifetime - daily palliative care instead of treatment directed
towards an early and positive curative outcome.
There
are four main necessities in life.
Air
- without which we die in minutes.
Water
- without which we die in days or weeks.
Food
(nutrition)
- without which we die in weeks or months.
Rest
(including sleep) -
without which we become inoperative and succumb to exhaustion and
illness.
The
contrived end result of modern medical training is to try and make
all forms of medication into another “pseudo
necessity”.
Not one without which we will die. But drugs without which we feel
we might die or medication without which we feel it might even be
better to die, in order to avoid “cold turkey” effects. !
1)
Demand based on the patient’s consumption of drugs which act
chemically on the body’s metabolic system to develop a
physiological substance addiction in the same way as drugs like
cocaine, crack, heroin, methadone and skunk, etc.,
plus,
2)
Demand based on the consumption of hypnotic or soporific drugs which
act on the reactive mind of the patient to enforce a psychological
demand which is triggered by statements made to the patient either
deliberately or innocently whilst he or she is in the semi-trance
state induced by the drug, which can then have the power of a
“command” on that patient.
e.g.
“You
must
remember to take your tablets”
!
Lenkei
points out that the attention of doctors in training has quite
quietly and cleverly been focussed on PRESCRIBING, not by teaching
that they must
prescribe, but by
playing down the value of any other options,
and by focussing on the alleviation of symptoms with medication,
rather than the searching with full and proper testing for
nutritional deficiencies, allergies and / or other possible causes.
Human
beings have bodies and minds which are potentially capable of a great
deal of self-repair, as long as one takes a few simple steps to
support that in-built self-healing.
During
any short or long recovery period,
whether it be from a cold, a germ, flu, food poisoning, a “bug”
or virus, toothache, sea sickness, over-indulgence, a fall, a broken
or bruised body part, loss of a partner, shock or emotional
overwhelm, etc., or
whether it is from nutritional deficiency (lack
of some vitamin or mineral) or nutritional overwhelm (too much of
some substance)
or as a result of an allergy to some chemical substance or
environmental factor, one
can suffer a variety of symptoms depending on which of the above
factors were the cause of one’s condition.
Modern
medical training keeps things rather too simple by encouraging and
teaching student doctors mainly to consider their patients’
symptoms (running-nose,
rash, headache, backache, toothache, cough, vomiting, crying, grief,
other emotional states, sneezing, breathing difficulties, etc.,)
and then “giving them something” to handle that symptom !
Nobody
says “thou
MUST concentrate on prescribing”
or “thou
must never look for the causes of symptoms”.
No.
It’s much more subtle than that.
Actions
such as testing for the huge variety of allergies which exist, or
testing for nutritional deficiencies are “CENSORED” – i.e.
basically omitted from student doctors’ diagnostic training, or
labelled as expensive, time consuming or wasteful – especially for
anyone who expects to become a G.P. with a busy N.H.S. practice.
In
fact, it’s all made to look very like instruction in the most
efficient time, resource and effort saving activities. But
it isn’t.
Perhaps
at least half of the symptoms presented to a local G.P. can be the
sorts of suffering which accompany any of the natural healing actions
of the body or the mind after injury, sickness or loss, etc., and
these can thus quite often be considered for temporary palliative
treatment – as long as that symptom treatment is not addictive.
However,
the other half are likely to have causes which will very likely lead
to a regular unexplained repetition of those symptoms or even death
if those causes are not identified and handled on a permanent basis,
and so must be tested & researched.
Examples
(taken from case studies):
1) A
young girl was reported as miserable and complaining of aches and
pains in some of her bones. The doctor prescribed a mild painkiller
for the pains, and on a later visit another medication to handle her
misery.
After
several visits over two months showing little improvement, the doctor
called in a second opinion, and Rickets was diagnosed. A vitamin “D”
supplement was prescribed and milk added to the girl’s diet every
day. Within a week the child was feeling better in all respects,
with no further usage of medication.
If
the doctor had looked for additional symptoms or taken a second
opinion earlier, the possibility of Rickets or even Coeliac Disease
or other problems with calcium deficiency would have been detected
and just as easily remedied – WITHOUT DRUGS.
2) A
boy kept having minor crashes or falls off his bike on his way home
from senior school during November evenings. He had bruises and
scrapes to both knees, both elbows and one hip, the worst of which
the practice nurse dressed and the doctor “temporarily”
prescribed a mild soporific to help him sleep, along with paracetamol
to reduce his pains.
But
by February, he was still having minor cycling accidents, including a
broken finger.
A
friend of the family noticed the boy had failing vision in poor light
and suggested that he have his eyes tested. The optician reported to
the boys G.P. that he suspected “Night Blindness” and recommended
a vitamin “A” supplement be considered.
This
was prescribed along with a small dietary change, and within two
weeks the boy reported
seeing much better in the evenings and at night.
Unfortunately,
he was no longer able to sleep without the unnecessary “temporary”
sleep prescription he had then been on for nearly three months, so
that the medication manufacturers had yet again procured a long term
consumer of their products !
3) A
boy of 16 was brought to the doctor by his mother because of
breathlessness, some exhaustion and signs of depression. The doctor
suspected smoking dope or sniffing glue especially as the boy also
had bad breath, but the boy strongly denied any such behaviour and,
after further questioning, the doctor decided the boy might have
bronchitis and suggested he should try using an inhaler to see if
there was any improvement.
This
the boy did for some days, but reported that the inhaler made him
dizzy, even more breathless and “absolutely fed-up” with the
whole scene. Taking this anxiety as an increasing sign of
depression, the doctor consulted his copy of the APA “Diagnostic &
Statistical Manual”, and prescribed diazepam, but after a week the
boy and his mother were back complaining of greater exhaustion,
breathlessness, continuing depression and other side-effects.
Fortunately,
a relative staying over with the family for a few days noticed that
the boy’s diet was comprised nearly exclusively of pizza, with no
fresh fruits, salads, vegetables or even real fruit drinks and
suggested that, for balance, he should eat a grapefruit or orange for
breakfast, or eat apples, peaches, pears, grapes or other fruit as a
desert after any meal.
The
boy agreed and within 2 days starts to feel better, and reported this
to the doctor on his next visit, by which time he was taking loads of
fruit each day, feeling great, no breathlessness and no depression.
The
doctor realised the boy was suffering from a deficiency of vitamin
“C”, and noted that his symptoms matched up with the onset of
scurvy (which the doctor learned from “Black's Medical Dictionary”),
for which he then wastefully prescribed ascorbic acid tablets, which
the boy failed to take as he preferred the fruits.
4) The
writer’s brother John, at near his seventh birthday, inexplicably
started to have attacks of difficult breathing which were eventually
diagnosed as “Asthma” for which the doctor prescribed medication
to cut short or modify sudden attacks and control more prolonged
bouts.
However,
over time, what had started in childhood as one day events at varying
intervals, become 3 and eventually 5 day absences from school and
later from university studies, with days 2, 3 & 4 spent at home
and even in bed.
In
his twenties, John was asked by a visiting aunt if he had been tested
for allergies, and insisted that he should be - resulting in “contact
with dogs or with people who have dogs or homes were dogs live”
quickly being diagnosed as allergic sources for John.
Knowing
this, he was able to take avoidance action but found that whilst this
increased the time between attacks, it did not reduce their length or
intensity.
A
year or two later he was introduced to a Dianetics practitioner, and
agreed to a course of consultations to locate what had caused his
continuing and severe allergy to all things “doggy”.
Over
a three week period of daily consultations John located a reactive
mind incident at six years of age in which he had been chased in a
rather friendly manner by what was for him a large dog.
Running
along a grass verge, John fell on his face and - in pain, in tears
and out of breath - the dog playfully licked his face and slobbered
over him and, because he was in pain and frightened, creating an
unconscious reactive memory record identifying pain, dogs, a fall and
cut grass with breathing difficulties.
By
finding, running and taking personal responsibility for this
incident, John was able to erase it from his unconscious and
controlling reactive memories and thus remove the source of the
twenty years of allergic asthmatic misery which had blighted his
education and his teenage and youthful social life.
If
the various doctors had not been so intent on medicating his
symptoms, and instead had earlier looked for causes via a modern
science of mental health, John knows that, whilst things improved
after eradicating his asthma, he could have earlier led a much fuller
life with a wider range of relationships and athletic activities.
5) The
writer’s first wife Louisa (now deceased) after our trying
unsuccessfully for three years to conceive, was told - by her G.P.
and medical specialists - that she was incapable of bearing children
because of fibroid growths in her womb plus the worst kind of
blockage of her fallopian tubes.
As
a result, whilst an operation was recommended, we were advised that,
whilst there was a 50/50 chance the removal of the fibroids would
succeed, there was less than a 1 in 10 chance of the fallopian tubes
being unblocked, and that, if it were not for the necessity for the
operation on the growths, because of the poor odds, they would not
normally attempt the fallopian tube operation on its own.
Finding
it strange that Louisa’s body had found TWO ways to avoid having
babies, we consulted the same Dianetics practitioner (James Paterson)
who had relieved my brother John of his debilitating asthmatic
condition and found he was recommending an exploratory analysis of
Louisa’s earlier life circumstances followed, if indicated, by
Dianetics “auditing” or “processing” of her case.
She
subsequently went to London for four weeks of daily consultations
whilst I went to Norway, Denmark, Sweden and Finland on a month long
business trip.
When
I picked her up from Jim’s consulting rooms on my return from
Scandinavia, I was
astounded to find what I can only describe as the girl I had hoped I
had married.
Happy,
healthy, vivacious and beautiful, Louisa greeted me with amazing
warmth, and three months later announced she was pregnant. Her G.P.
and the specialist didn’t believe it possible, said it was most
likely a “phantom” pregnancy and advised us to prepare for
disappointment. But our first daughter didn’t let us down, and
arrived quickly and easily, and just as healthy as her mother had
become.
For
us, the moral of the story was that a lot more of mankind’s
mysterious illnesses and physical conditions are psychosomatic
in nature, but have never been found, and never will be found, by the
pseudo-scientific approach so misleadingly called “psychiatric
mental health practices”.
BRITAIN’S
BIGGEST DRUG THREAT:
Hypnotic
+ Addictive,
Reinforced
Demand
Substances
“HARDS”,
or “HARD Substances”
are names given to those habit forming drugs which have the ability
to combine their chemically addictive action with their soporific
properties, to unintentionally or otherwise plant in a patient’s
unconsciousness a hypnotic command “TO USE” that same addictive
substance.
The
main medication handbook – the British National Formulary - lists
numerous pharmaceutical drugs which are officially indicated as
habit-forming and / or addictive. In addition, many of them are also
classified as “hypnotics” or as being soporific. i.e. Whilst
under the influence of a recent dose, statements directed at the
drugged patient are often able to take on the force of a hypnotic
command or implant, which that person must unwittingly obey.
The
patient is thus saddled with two separate and distinct compulsions to
both demand and consume that substance:
* the
FIRST acting chemically on the body’s metabolic system to develop a
physiological substance addiction in the same way as drugs like
cocaine, crack, heroin, methadone and skunk, etc., and,
* the
SECOND acting long term on the unconscious mind of the hypnotised
subject to also
enforce
a psychological demand which can become further reinforced by
additional commands.
If
the availability of HARD
Substances
was scarce, this would still be a suppressive situation to be very
carefully avoided in any democratic country. But shockingly some
4,000,000 doses of such drugs are swallowed every
day
of the year by over one million elderly NHS Patients, plus 100s of
1,000s of doses a day of other addictive prescription drugs by
younger persons – and the vast majority of these dosages are paid
for by U.K. taxpayers.
Whilst
a wide variety of drugs can have hypnotic side-effects, the main
prescription drugs officially categorised in the B.N.F. as being
addictive AND ALSO having hypnotic properties include:
“The
Hypnotics”, “The Anxiolytics” and
“The
Barbiturates”.
The
Benzodiazepines are probably the best known and most widely used of
these three classes of “hypnotics” (a
list of which is given at the end of the following section)
and for a variety of safety and quality-of-life reasons it is
important that the following facts are fully known, not only by the
prescribing doctors, but also by the patients as well as by the
patients’ close family members.
In
addition to the “benzos” there are the “Z” drugs, Chloral
drugs and derivatives plus Clomethiazole, followed by some of the
Anxiolytics and the Barbiturates. Because
they are dangerous all of these are “Prescription Only” drugs,
and thus a matter of “Physician Specification” rather than
“Patient Selection”.
So
we are not talking about patients choosing to use recreational
substances for fun.
We
are into the involuntarily addicting of millions of patients of all
ages and thus the formation and maintenance of by far the largest
group of addicts in Britain – larger my many many magnitudes than
the illegal addicts against which the so-called “War on Drugs” is
being waged by our Government at an annual cost of £ Billions !
e.g.
The Government’s National Audit Office tells us that overall it
costs U.K. taxpayers over £8.46 BILLION per year to pay for the once
a day dosing and other maintenance and support costs generated by our
180,000 legally prescribed methadone users.
If
that’s what 180,000 legally prescribed once-a-day methadone users
officially cost our taxpayers every year, how much per year are
nearly six times as many legally prescribed three-times-a-day
benzodiazepine users costing us ?
And
the answer is: AT
LEAST
as much again, plus the costs of other “HARD
Substances”
most likely totalling £20 Billion per year on just these few
examples of just a few controlling hypnotic drugs.
THIS
VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION IS CREATED
BY
THREE MAIN FACTORS:
ONE: The
hypnotic, addictive and demand developing nature of many of their
products is well known to the pharmaceutical industry, which, for
turnover and profit reasons, prefers to play down the huge cost and
social problems they cause because the development of regular and
increasing demand for their industry’s products (even if by
addiction) is by far the main goal of their marketing people, and
many of these people are leading psychiatric professionals.
TWO: The
doctor’s most difficult and responsible job is finding out what is wrong
with you – i.e. diagnosing. Once
he knows, deciding how to treat you is far easier, especially when
his diagnosis is correct.
To
help him make correct diagnoses, the doctor has many tools, not
always in his surgery, but at local hospitals and medical testing
laboratories.
However,
because nearly all medical practices are understaffed, and doctors
over-worked and short of time and resources, they most often rely on
time-saving “personal
professional diagnostic decisions”
which they can make on-the-spot, which helps them more quickly attend
to that day’s queue of patients.
Unfortunately,
no doctor can know about or immediately detect the effects of the
thousands of chemicals which are often added to the foods we expect
to find on supermarket shelves, and the over 700 different chemical
compounds which have at various times been found in common drinking
water.
There
are also agricultural chemicals, pesticides and the vast ranges of
industrial process chemicals, plus all the animals, insects, plants,
flowers and natural products to which humans can often be allergic.
Then
there are the chemicals we actually choose to add to our body's
intake !
As
a result, because no doctor can possibly keep up to date with all
these factors, we have hundreds of specialist testing laboratories
which can in a matter of hours or days (and in at least 50% of cases)
tell the doctor exactly what is likely troubling his patient. e.g.
“Not
enough of this in his or her diet.” “Never eat this and avoid
that, because they are poisoning you”,
etc.
Cases
solved, patients happy again or they would be if enough people were
being as thoroughly tested, and tested as often, as they should be -
but are not.
However,
a partial reason for not bothering to test is that patients don’t
want to make a return trip to the surgery in a week’s time to get
the news or to wait that long before being told what’s wrong.
Neither
does the doctor, who, not unnaturally, just wants to take the quick
and easy route of deciding, prescribing and moving on to the next
patient.
In
addition, U.S. psycho-pharmacology has “helpfully” supplied
doctors with an “easy-prescribing” bogus “reference book”
entitled “The Diagnostic & Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders,” which lists many of the symptoms (BUT NOT ACTUAL
CAUSES) for which HARD
Substances
are prescribed, and so helps to sell “HARDS”
to both doctors and the NHS.
Furthermore,
any test procedure costs more money than 10 minutes of the doctor’s
surgery time, so that even the N.H.S. and the Chancellor of the
Exchequer are happier avoiding the approaching 50% of cases which
didn’t need testing, and go along with efforts to raise that
proportion as often and as far as they can.
But
whilst all of this might look like effective time and cost saving, in
the long run it far too often proves to be false economy, extending
treatment times, producing no results and prompting false prescribing
plus wasteful and often harmful consumption of a huge amount of
expensive medical drugs, some of them far too often forming a basis
for involuntary addiction - lasting years.
On
this basis, as symptoms can so often have more than one possible
cause, the old adage: “prevention
is better than cure”
translates into “accurate
diagnostic testing is better than permanent daily sickness, illness
or disease MANAGEMENT”.
This is because accurate DIAGNOSIS BY TESTING leads to finding
causes, and then on to applying the right cures !
THREE: The
third reason for the country being swamped in HARD
Substances
paid for by our taxpayers is the fact that the Government goes on
year after year accepting advice on health matters from the
psychiatric and pharmaceutical industries.
But
these are the very business people whose professed goal in life is to
increase the quantities of their products being manufactured, the
amounts being distributed, THE AMOUNTS BEING USED, the number of U.K.
citizens using them, the amounts each citizen is using and, amongst
other ploys, they work hard to divert attention away from effective
non-medication cures, because cures stop people being clients for
their drugs !
So
the Government, which has been conned into believing it is receiving
advice from the game-keeper, is in fact locked deep in discussion
with, and being manipulated by, the local poacher !
Civil
servants and politicians are seldom if ever experts on addiction.
Nor is the NHS, which is not only the Government Department with the
biggest staff addiction problems, but also an organisation which does
not even attempt to cure addicts, but hides its lack of cure
technology by “commissioning” other organisations to deliver such
“rehab” services against standards which reveal their abject lack
of addiction recovery expertise.
Expecting
the psycho-pharms (the NHS’s pseudo “addiction treatment mentors”) to
know anything about recovery, is like illogically expecting those
engineers who manufacture the sharpest knives and scalpels to
automatically be the best surgeons !
In
Britain, 3% of addicts on methadone and 20 to 30% of addicts in 12
Steps Groups, attain doubtful abstinence in a period of years rather
than months as a result of which psychiatrists and pharmaceutical
suppliers are currently working hard to keep politicians and civil
servants away from an addiction recovery training system which have
been bringing addicts to self-help cures for 50 years.
Because
first time through, residential training in self-help addiction
recovery techniques helps 55 to 70+% of addicts at 98 training
centres in 49 countries to attain lasting relaxed abstinence, it
follows that senior government decision makers – in order to
receive unbiased viable and provable guidance on real and effective
solutions to addiction - must now wrest control of drug
rehabilitation away from the DoH & NHS and start listening to
those with 50 years of practice in “curing by self-help training”.
(NOT TREATMENT – TRAINING.)
This
can be delivered for a ONCE ONLY cost of less than half of what the
National Audit Office states it costs EVERY YEAR to handle each and
every existing prescription methadone patient !
But
this saving will not happen until Civil Servants & Politicians
start talking to those groups in the community which the
psycho-pharms have been denigrating, blackballing, ridiculing,
defaming and lying about for 66 years with the express intention of
making absolutely sure that Civil Servants and Politicians will be
too afraid of being politically “soiled” by talking to those
groups.
What
is desperately needed today is a political establishment with the
courage to stand up to the vested interest groups which are using
HARDS
to
make huge commercial fortunes, whilst crippling our education system,
our NHS, our working population, our retirement, our reputation and
our national sanity.
Proof
of the existence of such political courage will be furnished by the
quality of the replies received from government Ministers to the
following invitation:
Kindly
phone the author of this blogpost - Ken Eckersley - on 01342 810151 to
invite him for an in-depth discussion at your offices on the subject
of: “Effective
and Economical Addiction Recovery.“
HOW
MILLIONS OF PATIENTS ARE ACTUALLY HYPNOTISED
INTO
DEMANDING SUPPLIES OF ADDICTIVE DRUGS
Most
people know that an addictive drug is one which has the chemical
ability to alter for varying periods the metabolism of a human body
in such a way as to create an irresistible physiological demand for
regular supplies of that particular chemical. In the absence of
further supplies of that chemical, the individual can suffer a
variety of painful, embarrassing and weakening bodily effects, which
have come to be known as “cold turkey” withdrawal symptoms.
Most
of the time we hear about these debilitating and controlling effects
just in relation to those few hundreds of thousands of recreational
drug users who are short of further supplies of their cocaine, crack,
heroin or skunk, etc.
However,
one form or another of these cold turkey effects also impose
themselves on patients who have been prescribed one or other of a
wide range of officially designated habit forming, addictive and / or
dependency developing pharmaceutical
medical drugs.
Out
of the nearly a quarter million doctors in the U.K. there are some
60,000 General Practitioners and, prescribed by them, every working
day millions of doses of these drugs are taken by their patients as
medical “treatment” for an ever increasing number of “symptoms”
categorised as either physical or mainly mental disorders.
Few
patients would regard themselves as being in need of “mental health
treatment”, but psychiatry has been busy expanding the market for
their own professional skills as well as for pharmaceutical products,
and the main result has been that G.Ps are now prescribing as much
medication for emotional symptoms as they used to do for back, ear,
tummy and head aches, etc.. etc.
BUT
WHO HYPNOTISES PATIENTS, AND WHO GIVES THEM THE HYPNOTIC COMMANDS TO
USE DRUGS ?
It
is the drugs supplied by the pharmaceutical companies and prescribed
by local doctors, which hypnotise people !
Today,
nobody needs to stare into your eyes, swing a bright object in front
of you or speak in a monotonous tone to induce a hypnotic trance
state. The pharmaceutical medical drugs listed below (and others)
will all to a greater or lesser degree induce a light hypnotic trance
condition, lasting for a few hours after each dose.
So
when a 67 year old pensioner who lost her husband two weeks ago is in
her doctor’s surgery at 10.00am for new advice, she is still under
the hypnotic influence of the last of the benzodiazepine tablets
which she took with her breakfast, and part of the discussion goes
like this:
Doctor: And
how did you get on with the tablets I gave you ?
Patient: Well
I have to confess I forgot to take them on a couple of occasions. Would that be why I had a little diarrhoea ?
Doctor: Possibly,
but the main thing is to take them regularly, so DON’T
FORGET TO TAKE ONE TABLET WITH EACH MEAL.
After
collecting her new prescription she goes home for lunch and has her
next tablet, and an hour later her daughter Betty pops in:
Betty: So
what did the doctor say ?
Mother:
He wasn’t pleased about me forgetting to take the tablets.
Betty: Well
he’s right Mum. YOU
MUST NEVER FORGET TO TAKE YOUR TABLETS EVERY DAY.
The
type of statements shown in Capital Letters, when directed at a
person under the influence of any of the following drugs, can have
the power and force of hypnotic commands which will likely be
obeyed:
Chloral
Hydrate, Chlordiazepoxide, Clomethiazole, Diazepam, Flunitrazepam, Flurazepam,
Formetazepam, Loprazolam, Lorazepam, Lormetazepam, Nitrazepam,
Oxazepam, Promethazine Hydrochloride, Temazepam, Triclofos Sodium.,
Zolpidem, Zopiclone - and others.
N.B.
There are some 8,000 medical drugs, many of which have side effects
which include dependency, addiction and hypnotic,
soporific
and numbing properties.
The
above list of HARDS
is therefore by no means
exhaustive
and, being subject to change, the above
and
other substances should be checked out against
the
B.N.F., or with a medical dictionary, or at your
local
Citizen's Advice Bureau.
There
is also a wide range of other prescription drugs which are addictive
but not necessarily hypnotic, which you may wish to avoid or handle
cautiously.
MAD
DOGS ARE USUALLY SHOT.
INSTEAD
ETHICAL PSYCHIATRISTS
CAN
LIKELY BE RE-TRAINED
As
an 89 year old, in my long career I have often enjoyed meeting and
talking “technically” with many psychiatrists at seminars,
conferences and other events, and I have yet to meet a single one who
started into his or her studies with the intention of using their
professional skills to harm patients.
Those
I have met nearly uniformly started into the medical profession as
individuals interested in helping people, usually initially with
physical health problems but later moving into trying to help the
mentally distressed by taking further training in psychiatry.
Which
is where their problems and those of the society start, because it is
basically not psychiatrists who are the problem, IT IS THE SUBJECT OF
PSYCHIATRY WHICH IS AT FAULT.
Psychiatry
went on to the wrong track so many years ago that its lack of real
mental technology now has it entrenched in weird, illogical and
dangerous theories and practices from which, without
abandoning their careers and sacrificing their years of confusing and
difficult training AS WELL AS THEIR FAMILY’S INCOME, it is
extremely difficult for them to now escape.
Unfortunately,
there are rotten apples in every barrel, and amongst psychiatrists we
have recently seen arrests for a variety of crimes, mainly against
their patients, and including fraud, rape, paedophilia, sexual
interference, theft and misappropriation, etc.
But
don’t let this divert us from the sad fact that over half of all
psychiatrists, especially
those in private practice, are trying hard with blunt, ill-designed
and inappropriate tools to do some good in the world. In fact
psychiatry is one field of employment in which a workman can
correctly “blame
his tools”.
The
problem is that, with a training and interning career over a decade
long, most confessions of disillusionment with psychiatry’s lack of
effective technology are related by men in their early to mid
thirties with wives, young families and other commitments
(occasionally
including training debts)
which they could not envisage being able to handle with an
alternative career outside psychiatry.
In
fact I found that most agreed that the study of psychiatry was and is
the biggest Catch 22 of all career studies.
But
the real question is - having realised they have been conned into
years of wasted time, effort and costly training by their career
choice - what
are they doing about it ?
And
the main answer one receives is “What can I do but continue?”
So
we have a largely disillusioned and basically disinterested set of
middle-class medicos hanging on to their hard earned positions by
carefully conforming with their Psychiatric Association’s current
norms based on prescribing to the drug demand development goals of
the pharmaceutical companies.
Alongside
them, we have other medicos and G.Ps who have been trained into
“prescribing
medication for symptoms”
rather than using full diagnostic testing to discover the nutritional
deficiencies and allergies which occur in nearly half of all cases.
In
other words, the senior psychiatric world leaders (who
work closely with pharmaceutical industry leaders and look upon their
bogus “science” as a population control methodology)
are the real mental health criminals in more than one respect.
Not
only do they use normal behavioural and emotional symptoms as excuses
for condemning normal people to their appalling “treatments” but
the very nature of those inhuman “treatments” demonstrate beyond
doubt that those psychiatric leaders themselves are mentally severely
aberrated and thus themselves in need of some intervention which will
rescue them from their insane condition or, at the very least, save
society from them !
66
years ago, seeking the road to improving mental health, some
basically well intentioned medical students unfortunately took a
completely wrong fork, sign-posted “psychiatry”, but at the same
time, around the world a far greater number of similarly inclined
students chose to study and practice Dianetics®
–
L. Ron Hubbard’s “Modern Science of Mental Health®, and thus found
themselves not only able to achieve the sort of uplifting, satisfying
and valuable results they had always dreamed of, but able also to
earn an honest and rewarding living within the society.
Fortunately,
the opportunity to take that honest and rewarding path to effective
mental health is still open to those psychiatrists, psycho-analysts,
psycho-therapists, psychologists and hypnotists, etc., who now
recognise the lack of humanity and results within their current
“disciplines” and seek to reach a worthwhile and easily
attainable new professional status in a reasonable time and at modest
cost.
Obviously,
they will have to prove that they have retained their ethics and have
not personally participated in the delivery of damaging or
traumatising so-called mental “treatments”.
If
they can, then the door to a satisfying and successful career as a
Dianetics practitioner, relieving and eradicating the world’s
emotional problems and genuine mental disorders, may well be open to
them.
POSTSCRIPT:
YOU
NO LONGER NEED TO BE MAD
TO
BE ON PSYCHIATRIC DRUGS
Every
business in the world seeks to expand its sales
to
more and more consumers
EVERY
YEAR.
Pharmaceutical
companies use psychiatric labelling
of
more and more people as “mentally disordered”
to
have doctors prescribe and dose them with
MORE
AND MORE ADDICTIVE DRUGS
paid
for by U.K. taxpayers !
If
you prefer NOT to be drugged, or would rather
NOT
have your taxes used to drug others
JUST
TO INCREASE PSYCHO-PHARMACEUTICAL
TURNOVER
AND PROFITABILITY,
learn
from this blog-post
what
you should be saying to your local M.P.
S.A.F.E.
Is A Not-For-Profit Community Support Group Formed In 1975.
(Kindly
note: “L. Ron Hubbard” and “Dianetics” are registered
trade
and / or service marks of ABLE International®
.)
__________________________________________________________________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment