Showing posts with label Allergies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Allergies. Show all posts

Tuesday, 2 April 2019

AVOIDING & PREVENTING THE SUPER ALLERGY WE KNOW AS: DEMENTIA

THE SUPER ALLERGY - ORIGINATED BY PAIN AND MULTIPLIED BY EASY PROFIT.

Allergies are the result of our having, and being controlled by, an environmental “allergen” - defined and installed by our own “REACTIVE MIND” - that stimulus-response mental mechanism possessed by Man and all flesh & blood Animals, the latter organisms apparently having solely that mind as a guiding or controlling force in their lives.

The over-riding duty of the Reactive Mind is the protection and ensuring of the survival of the Bodies of various Earth species – including the bodies of individual Human Beings.

At times of painful threat, painful injury and painful attack upon Man’s body, the Reactive Mind is NOT concerned with the survival of the very personal purposeful motivating force and superior Analytical Mind of the “Being” which is normally controlling and giving purpose to the life of each individual and unique Human.

The Reactive Mind is governed solely by protective stimulus response, by action and reaction, the push-button which rings the bell, the pollens which make us sneeze with hay fever, the allergenic causes of asthma, and the various unrecognised mental health trigger factors in our immediate environment, which govern much of our lives and our behaviour, all unconsciously and so without our knowing.

Environmental factors to which the Reactive Minds of Human Beings automatically react in order – ABOVE ALL ELSE - to protect and ensure the survival of our BODIES (not our Analytical Mind facilities and our Souls) - now and in the future.

Whilst most of us recognise and possess the five main senses of sight, sound, touch, taste and smell, researchers tell us that there are at least another 45 ways in which we can become aware of, detect, identify or recognise factors in the physical universe including, amongst others, a sense of direction, a sense of balance, a sense of weight, motion and inertia, etc., etc.

And those who study allergies blame restimulative “trigger” factors, or “allergens”, which can crop up in our local environment, as being responsible for various reactions to those triggers – reactions which can be good, bad or even ugly enough to kill.

As currently defined by limited research of allergens (rather than by the more logical study of the Reactive Minds which designate and install allergens and research into why they do so), “allergy” essentially means special or unusual sensitivity of an individual to certain foods, pollens, nuts or other plant products, animal emanations, insect bites and chemicals, etc., etc., so that in such an individual, conditions like asthma, dyspepsia, nettle-rash, hay fever, eczema, headaches, migraines and obesity, etc., are generated.

According to authoritative medical dictionaries, the substances purported to produce allergies (i.e. the “allergens”) are amazingly numerous, often protein in nature and include such ordinary foods as eggs, milk, flour and potatoes, strawberries, peanuts, tomatoes, cauliflower, walnuts, pork, shell-fish, salmon, coffee and sugars, etc., as well as colouring and preservative agents, plus left-over traces of chemical fertilisers and residual growth hormones utilised in our food production. An allergy may also be caused by inhalation of dust from feathers (in pillows), from the hair of horses, dogs or cats, from pollen produced by plants, as well as paints and spirits, etc., - nearly ad infinitum.

Close examination of the above commonly reported allergenic triggers, reveals that they are all basically related to our “minor” senses of taste, touch and smell, and in fact we find no reference to allergies of our “superior” senses – sight and sound !

On the other hand, is it possible (by virtue of our pre-occupation with the material universe and psychiatry’s denial of mental and spiritual factors like “Mind” and “Spirit”) that we are missing the obvious, and that scenes, colours, sights, sounds, statements, pictures, commands, melodies, music and even the odd word, can also be allergens ?

NAMELY, THAT THOSE CONDITIONS WE CORRECTLY DEFINE AS “MENTAL ILLNESSES” ARE ACTUALLY THE UNRECOGNISED ALLERGIES OF “SIGHT” AND “SOUND”.

Confirmation of the powerful transient control a specific “sight” or “sound” can have on behaviour comes from another unusual source as well as from everyday actions. A red light immediately stops vehicle drivers. An army sergeant shouting “SHUN” causes a hundred soldiers to click their heels together and to stand to attention.

But, more to the point, and proven on theatre stages, T.V. and in many consulting rooms worldwide, most hypnotists are able to install a command in a subject whereby, when-ever the hypnotist is SEEN by his subject to “touch his tie”, that subject feels overwhelm-ingly compelled to remove his jacket (usually justified by his saying “It’s hot in here”.)

But when, a few minutes later, the hypnotist SAYS and the subject HEARS another also installed command, such as the spoken words “How are you now”, the subject automatically responds by putting his jacket back on (usually again justifying his auto re-action to the hypnotist’s words by saying something like “It’s getting cold in here”).

What we are witnessing here, both for allergies and hypnotised subjects, is the power of the stimulus-response nature of what Freud called the “Unconscious Mind” (thus named because we are not conscious of its existence) but which is better called the “Reactive Mind”, because it automatically reacts to what has been installed by life’s painful and traumatic incidents, by re-stimulation of such incidents or by hypnotic suggestion.

Freud was the first researcher to get close to the cause of any real HUMAN mental health problems, but regrettably was diverted from completing his exploration of them.

This Reactive Mind is created at about the same moment as conception (along with the tiny zygote formed during intercourse) as nature’s system for the protection and survival of the new human body which is about to be constructed and developed in the Mother’s womb. Until just before the birth date this Reactive Mind has nothing to do with the survival of 1) the new Person or 2) that Person’s Analytical Mind facilities, simply because both these factors researchers have known since the 1950s, do not enter upon the scene until much later in the pregnancy cycle – i.e. immediately prior to the baby’s birth date.

The earlier established body protecting Reactive Mind’s natural stimulus-response function is simple  and can quite often be effective.

In order that they may be recognised, avoided or successfully handled in future similar circumstance, that Reactive “mind” sets about recording in the body’s affected cells, every relevant traumatic, painful, injurious, damaging and threatening INCIDENT experienced by those body cells, ALONG WITH the action which was taken at the time in order to survive or overcome the pain and trauma, etc., JUST IN CASE THAT PARTICULAR SUCCESSFUL SURVIVAL ACTION MIGHT HAVE FUTURE USAGE.

A crudely logical procedure, and often an effective one in part or in full.

BUT, unfortunately history does not always repeat itself in exactly the same sequence, manner or circumstances every time, and as a result, that which was recorded as a survival action at an earlier time, when enforced under similar BUT OFTEN MAINLY DIFFERENT NEW circumstances, can even lead to the opposite of healthy survival or to an on-going life of curtailed or diminished physical and / or mental existence arising from permanent injury – caused by reactively handling a current traumatic incident in EXACTLY the same way as an earlier incident IT MAY IN FACT ONLY SUPERFICIALLY RESEMBLE.

Because the Reactive Mind operates strictly on the very specific idea that without the body, neither the Person nor the Person’s Analytical Mind can exist or function, it operates to enforce physical survival OVER AND ABOVE the wishes or needs of the Person and the Person’s present time ANALYTICAL assessment of any traumatic circumstances of the moment.

In other words, in its over-riding body survival goal, IN ORDER TO AVOID INTERFERENCE (from yourself and / or your Analytical Mind) the Reactive Mind can, when automatically re-stimulated by the current situation’s triggers, reduce the participation of your Analytical Mind partly or fully down to zero – i.e. into the state we know as “unconsciousness”, which also locks out the Spiritual Being (YOU) - the C.E.O. of that body.

Which, to say the least, is unfortunate because, whilst the Reactive Mind is only able to IDENTIFY or recognise factors in the environment, the Analytical Mind is additionally capable of COMPARING and DIFFERENTIATING between those factors, and thus operates “intelligently”.  (This of course is why Man effectively rules the world – because animals have only a Reactive Mind and thus no intelligent analytical ability or goals beyond their own body survival and reproduction of further bodies.)

It also accounts for why any Human Being (if, as and when reactively re-stimulated by the environment) can, at any time, abandon analytical present time logical handling of his or her life, and start instead to act in an automatic, mechanical and possibly illogical manner, which might either be helpful OR dangerous / injurious to self and others.

These reactive episodes, which can vary in emotional tone and duration from one incident to another, are what most people have come to recognise as Mental Health problems - when such emotional states are increasingly chronic.

Rising up from Low to High, these emotional states include (amongst others):

Feeling Useless,
Apathy,
Hopelessness,
Victimisation,
Self-Abasement,
Being Undeserving,
Making Amends,
Grief,
Propitiation,
Sympathy,
Numbness,
Terror,
Despair,
Fear,
Anxiety,
Covert Hostility,
Unstated Resentment
No Sympathy,
Resentment,
Hate,
Anger,
Pain,
Hostility,
Antagonism.

Psychiatry (in its infamous “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders” derived from un-researched and un-proven invention and by the re-labelling of normal conditions as mental disorders) has recently managed in a short space of time to expand its field of operation to include nearly 400 so-called “Mental Disorders” in order (as deliberately intended by Carnegie & Rockefeller) to provide as many opportunities as possible for the prescribing (at taxpayer expense) of extremely profitable multi-daily doses of addictive pharmaceutical drugs. Prescribed drugs which we know from experience can create many of the above emotional conditions – and regularly do so.

But the fact, proven in 1950, IS that most forms of mental irregularity stem from the mistakes, the failures and even the correct workings of the Reactive Mind, and in a live human being are demonstrated and dramatized in the emotional conditions listed above when they become chronic in duration.

In the above emotional states one can see reflected and displayed the neuroses, psychoses, paranoia, schizophrenia, ADHD, PTSD, Bipolar and numerous other psychiatric disorders – but with one notable difference between these psychiatric so-called “disorders” and that list of commonly displayed human emotions.

On the one hand, so-called psychiatric disorders all depend for their treatment on Electric Shock Therapy (ECT), invasive brain operations such as Pre-Frontal Lobotomies and Leucotomies, massive “Deep Sleep” drug dosages and / or long-term extremely profitable multi-daily doses of mainly addictive pharmaceutical drugs.

But, on the other hand, clearing out from the Reactive Mind those unknown reactive recordings which underlie the psychiatric conditions listed in the paragraph prior to the last one, requires only specifically trained expert communication procedures in one’s own language between a qualified Dianetics® practitioner and the troubled individual.

Unfortunately however, there is one thing which usually makes this viable route to full Mental Health impossible for many people.

Anybody who has already received ECT, a brain operation, or psychiatric pharmaceutical drugs would normally be unable to fully benefit from modern human Mental Health restorative procedures. Simply because, proven by experience over 69 years, it is clear that such psychiatric “treatments” disable the individual’s own memory paths and natural mental healing abilities, and thus render a troubled individual virtually incurable.

Psychiatry has been in existence since the mid-1800s, and backed by the evidence of the last 170 years you could rightly say that: THE FOUR THINGS WRONG WITH MENTAL HEALTH PROVISION IN GREAT BRITAIN (and in most other countries) ARE PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSING, PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT, PSYCHIATRIC PRESCRIBING AND THE BEHAVIOUR OF MOST PSYCHIATRISTS !

CHECK-UP ON HOW MANY “PSYCHS” FINISH-UP IN COURT, AND IN PRISON, and why they are the profession reported to have the highest suicide rate ! (Which even Psychiatrists recognise is mainly due to repeated failure.)

When researching for why psychiatry has descended to being such a danger for Mankind and for psychiatrists themselves, we discover two significant sets of data.

THE FIRST being the fact that from the time of Wilhelm Wundt of Leipzig onwards, psychiatric research has been nearly exclusively conducted on Soul-less and Analytically Mind-less millions of mice, millions of rats and Pavlov’s Dogs, plus half dead concentration camp prisoners and already insane mental asylum inmates.

Only a few psychological researchers like Freud set out to investigate the ordinary Man’s mental make-up, and so it was Psychiatry which finished up rejecting evidence of the existence of the human “Mind” and the evidence of a million years of religious belief in Man’s “Soul” – just because animals do not detectably have Analytical Minds or Souls !

THE SECOND significant set of data bringing world mental health to its current dangerous, damaging and demeaning situation comes from the early 1900s, when the American Medical Association accepted a joint offer from the Carnegie Institute and John D. Rockefeller, to take over the TRAINING of all U.S. General Practitioners, Doctors and Other Physicians.

This millionaire duo was already in the industrial and agricultural chemical business, but recognising that there were BILLIONS of Human Beings on Earth, who could utilise pharmaceutical drugs, they wanted to take control of and seriously expand & exploit that lucrative marketplace, knowing well the massive easy sales potential of addictive drugs.

THEIR METHOD WAS VERY SIMPLE, AND THEREFORE RELATIVELY EASY.

They were NOT interested in testing for dietary shortages or excesses. Or in seeking any explanations for allergic reactions to chemicals or other allergens. THOSE SUBJECTS DID NOTHING TO SELL ADDICTIVE AND OTHER MEDICAL DRUGS, and in fact had the potential to steer medical treatment away from pharmaceutical drug prescribing.

As a result, they gave so-called “research grants” only to those U.S. Medical Universities, Colleges and Teaching Hospitals which nearly exclusively taught PALLIATIVE diagnosing and prescribing for SYMPTOMS, rather than spending time, money and effort on investigating and testing for CAUSES.

Their mantra was “Why waste precious medical diagnostic time and expensive and long winded laboratory time, on testing for “causes”, when the “symptoms” the patient is suffering from, are what need handling as quickly as possible – which can (they said) so obviously be done by prescribing a relevant drug” ! (Preferably an addictive one !)

The result by 1927 was the near total demise in American medical training of investigation of dietary causes of sickness plus a similar curtailing of curricula interest in allergies and how they might influence human health and behaviour.

And with little psychiatric diagnostic support at that time, they concentrated their efforts nearly exclusively on Physical Disorders until the 1950s. Since then, pushed by international Big Pharma in the field of Physical Health and by their psychiatric running mates in the field of Mental Health, we have seen PALLIATIVE “symptom only treating”procedures spread across the globe to every national health system in the world - especially those with taxpayer financed health services - such as our N.H.S.

The stifling of research into dietary subjects is now starting to show up in the statistics for obesity, suffered by 63% of British women, 50% of British men and 30% of our children.

The equal stifling of research into allergies has of course encouraged the lucrative prescribing of drugs in that sector, BUT, more importantly has deliberately frustrated and opposed the proven fact that genuine mental problems ARE after all, nothing more than the dramatization of “sight” and “sound” allergies built-up in quantity and activity from conception onwards, and capable of easy eradication with Dianetics technology.

And bear in mind that, because sight and sound both cover comprehension of written and spoken language, the written word and the spoken word can both have powerful, meaningful and thus MUCH MORE controlling impact on the viewer and the listener.

But “an understanding of true Mental Health problems” is the baby that pharmaceutical research grants threw out with the bathwater when they drove out full and proper research into allergies !

Allergies are the result of having and being controlled by a Reactive Mind. A stimulus-response mechanism which is possessed by all Human Beings, and the anatomy and operation of allergies is as follows:
The basic component of any allergy is a Reactive Mind recording of a painfully traumatic and injurious incident, PLUS, a simultaneous recording of what was provably successful at that time in procuring the on-going survival of the injured body.

As, when and if a second similar incident is recorded, for natural in-built automatic body protection reasons the Reactive Mind (which, because of its inability to Compare and Differentiate, cannot measure time) treats these incidents as likely happening at any time or all the time, and so initiates an unknown to the person, automatic constant watch for the threatening environmental factors contained in the two incidents.

When such factors, WHICH ARE ESSENTIALLY ALLERGENS, are detected in the local environment, in order to protect the body, the Reactive Mind triggers – i.e. immediately tries to apply - the recordings of the earlier actions which provably provided continuing body survival, even though other different environmental factors now present (or perhaps not available) might render that application of an earlier recorded past “survival action” impossible - or even highly dangerous.

Depending on the nature of the original trauma, those earlier recorded survival actions are of a wide variety.

If the original trauma was an infection, a contagion, a germ, a virus, a poison, impact, burns, a breakage, etc., along with any medication, the body’s own natural healing abilities will have handled the situation, and the resulting period of illness would have taken an appropriate and recognisable form: skin spots, coughing, shivering, elevated or depressed body temperature, vomiting, itching, diarrhoea, sneezing, blocked breathing channels, sore eyes, pounding heart, immobility, high or low blood pressure, etc.

But if crying, running, screaming, hiding, sulking, struggling, fighting, anxiety, depression, or any of the above listed emotions were part of earlier successful survival, then they will very likely also later be dramatized.

And as long as the body survived, then, along with the original survival action recordings, such new reactions (and their recordings) also become “necessary” survival conditions or triggers for any future similar attacks OR threats of such attacks.

Which results in only one thing:   CONTINUOUS EXPANSION THROUGHOUT HUMAN LIFE OF THE CONTENT OF THE REACTIVE MIND.

This in turn results in continuous EXPANSION of that Reactive Mind’s ACTIVITY, along with continuous REDUCTION of the activities of the Analytical Mind, PLUS reduction of the length and frequency of the periods of time when the Being (who is normally the body’s C.E.O.) gives life, purpose and direction to his or her body.

In the following Bar Chart, periods of REACTIVE ACTIVITY (shown in Black and commencing at conception) INCREASE in line with expanding Reactive Mind CONTENT – as more and more painful anti-survival incidents occur and accrue.

Periods of ANALYTICAL ACTIVITY (shown in Grey and starting immediately before birth) DECREASE BECAUSE OF increasing Reactive Mind Activity, which partly or fully shuts down the Analytical Function at painful or threatening times.

Symptoms of Dementia can start appearing at any age, but usually from 50 years on.

(N.B. The pain motivated increase in Reactive Mind CONTENT is NOT on a smooth gradient as shown below, but varies from person to person and from time to time for each person.)

BAR CHART NOTIONALLY REPRESENTING DAILY AVERAGE LIFELONG REACTIVE ACTIVITY (R) 
VERSUS
DAILY AVERAGE LIFELONG ANALYTICAL ACTIVITY (A)

   9    decade    decade   decade    decade    decade   decade   decade    decade   decade
Mths 00-10     10-20     20-30     30-40      40-50     50-60     60-70     70-80     80-90
Preg   years       years      years      years       years      years      years       years      years
 (R)  (R)  (A)  (R)  (A)  (R)  (A)  (R)  (A)  (R)  (A)  (R)  (A)  (R)  (A)  (R)  (A)  (R)  (A)















Serious physical injury is of course capable of occurring from conception onwards, whilst other forms of major trauma - before or after birth – (and including failed abortion and other pre-natal incidents, rapes, births, male and female circumcision, poisonings, recreational and prescription drug consumption, burning, scalding, bone-breaking and impact, etc., etc.) can at any age, but not always, create mental abnormalities as well as, or instead of, the purely physical impact on the body.

Please also bear in mind that because the fundamental basis of all recordings in the Reactive Mind is Attacks Upon and Injury and Threats to the Body AND because all drug doses are essentially doses of poisons, THEN, along with electric shocks and brain operations ALL the so-called psychiatric & pharmaceutical ‘treatments’ the politicians have been conned into allowing and supporting, are actually creating massive expansions of Reactive Mind content and thus deliberate massive expansions of U.K. Mental Health problems, including Dementia (but not necessarily Alzheimers, which appears to have physical brain deterioration causes).

Currently (March 2019) a government Bill (being quietly pushed through Parliament whilst the Cabinet is busy with Brexit and entitled “Transforming Children’s and Young People’s Mental Health Provision”) will place a psychiatrist in every School, College, University and G.P. Surgery, who will prescribe daily doses of addictive drugs to the 5 to 25 years old age group, comprised of 18 million U.K. pupils and students – just to spend an extra £20 billion a year, as demanded with threats by the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry in April 2017.

Before you allow that Bill to become the most suppressive law ever passed in any civilised country, please recognise that the only thing wrong with Mental Health Provision in this country is the positioning of Psychiatrists and Pharmaceutical production companies as the “experts” on mental health, when they are in fact no more than the experts on how to quietly and efficiently “milk” the Exchequer and our U.K. taxpayers via the National Health Service.
(So “Drinka Pinta Milka Day” is now “Takea Lotta Lovely Drugsa Day”.)

Ministers, Officials and other Politicians might be forgiven, because everything they know about psychiatry and pharmaceuticals they regrettably have normally to learn from psychiatrists and pharmaceutical producers, who pose as Gamekeepers, when they are actually Poachers. (Or more accurately “Pushers” of easy profit addictive drugs !)

These misleading advisors cleverly & efficiently manipulate the Government, mainly via M.Ps’ over-riding commitment to the maximising of Employment Opportunities and Tax Collection and the vote catching potential of the N.H.S. - because patients have also been sold the idea that prescribing for symptoms is the be all and end all of a health service. (And is today why we have 6 times more State supplied drug addicts than illegal addicts.)

So much so, that the politicians illogically spend more than they raise from the taxes contributed by the psycho-pharms - on weekly town centre cleaning, Policing, Courts, prisons, school addicts and “managing” (and dosing) for life over 6 million drug addicts deliberately created by the psycho-pharms with addictive prescription drugs.

But, if you are not worried by the news in the last 9 pages, wait till you hear the really bad news !

According to the psychiatric “experts” on Alzheimers and the far more prevalent Dementia, no cause or cure for Dementia is yet known, approaching one million people in the U.K. are already living with Dementia, an average of over 100 more people move into Dementia every day, 2 million British people will be living with Dementia by 2050, and one in three people will die with some form of Dementia.

They also correctly report that this increasingly serious situation already costs the U.K. economy £24 BILLION every year and, most worryingly, they say that there are currently NO EFFECTIVE TREATMENTS to slow or stop Dementia.

HOWEVER, THE 91 YEAR OLD UN-DEMENTED WRITER OF THIS BRIEFING TOTALLY DIS-AGREES WITH THE PSYCHO-PHARM “EXPERTS” IN CAMBRIDGE AND ANYWHERE ELSE !

SIMPLY BECAUSE THE CAUSE OF DEMENTIA IS KNOWN, AND, whilst a cure is not yet available, it is clear how Dementia can be AVOIDED and how it may be PREVENTED if one starts early enough. Additionally, knowing the cause, we also know how to bring some relief to a confirmed sufferer and to his or her family.

Please bear in mind that ALL genuine mental health problems are actually allergies of TRANSIENT sight & sound, as distinct from better known physical allergies, related to material / physical factors which we can taste, touch and smell.

Recognise also that the confusions and irrationality of Dementia are created by the fact that THE REACTIVE MIND OF THE SUFFERER IS MORE OFTEN AND FOR LONGER DURATIONS IN CHARGE OF HIS OR HER LIFE, to the point where THE HUMAN ANALYTICAL MIND IS NO LONGER IN CHARGE, because THE WHOLE LOCAL ENVIRONMENT HAS EFFECTIVELY BECOME ONE NEARLY CONTINUOUS ALLERGEN, keeping the sufferer (and family) in what is actually now a U.K. wide “Super Allergy” !

Avoiding Dementia – is simply a matter of avoiding pain, injury, impact and attacks upon your body. This means, in addition to avoiding boxing, rugby, wrestling, extreme sports and poisons, you should keep away from fashions like tattooing, piercings, ALL forms of drugs, circumcision and abortion, and any other action which is painful or physically upsetting. It can also mean occasionally changing your climatic location, your surroundings, your diet and even some of your acquaintances.

Preventing Dementia – is achieved by the application of actions you can take after failing to avoid painful body injuring and destroying incidents – and these actions are of two main types. “Assists Processes” are applied immediately after a failure to avoid. i.e. within a couple of hours after the incident, and preferably sooner when possible. In an emergency, such “Assists” can be obtained free of charge from a Scientology Volunteer Minister or from your nearest Scientology Church or Dianetics Practitioner, and any individual interested in expanding his or her knowledge, can apply to undertake a short inexpensive training course in how to deliver many of the various Assists available.

Where a longer period of time has elapsed since a given painful injury or attack on the body (in addition to obtaining relief from the application of Assists) in order to achieve fuller Prevention of Reactive Mind re-stimulation, it is necessary to undertake “Objective” processing procedures and / or “Dianetics” Clear Auditing, which is what the un-demented author of this briefing did 45 years ago.

These processes can straightforwardly and inexpensively be done between two family members, friends or acquaintances after undertaking the necessary training, or, for a fee, can be obtained from a professionally trained and experienced Dianetics Auditor.

To obtain full details of the availability of Dianetics® training & auditing in your district, phone the author of this briefing on (01342) 811099 or 810151 any day between 11.00am and 9.00pm,
or e-mail keneck@btinternet.com at any time.

________________________________________

This blog post researched and published by
S.A.F.E.
the U.K. Based
Society for an Addiction Free Existence

Established as a not-for-profit Community Support Group in 1974.
__________________________________________________________________________________

Sunday, 6 August 2017

THE ALLERGIES OF SIGHT & SOUND:


ALLERGIES, DRUG ADDICTION,

PSYCHOSOMATIC ILLNESSES

AND POOR MENTAL HEALTH.


IS THERE A CONNECTION ?



A recent T.V. programme on allergies proved excellent as far as it went. Unfortunately, whilst it painted a near perfect picture of what was known of that subject in 1955, it fell so far behind what is known today from 67 years of Dianetics® practice, that it renders the producer’s dedicated work nothing more than a description of what allergies, and particularly asthma, DO to sufferers and how best to handle and alleviate their symptoms.

This statement does not undervalue the work of that programme, but reveals that it did nothing to expose and handle the underlying cause of allergies.

Just ask yourself the question: “If bedbugs, cat hairs and dust mites are the real cause of asthma, because these are present in 99.9% of houses across the land – why have we not all got asthma ??”

Also - if we clean up the family home to a point which provides the relief so desperately sought, how do we handle their local school, or the hotel where they go on holiday ?

For many decades the medical profession has recognised and treated various allergic reactions to the touch, the taste, the smell and / or the ingestion of a wide range of substances.

Over the years, nuts, eggs, dairy produce, cats, dogs, animal fur, new mown grass, warm tar, tobacco-smoke, alcohol, sugar, shell-fish, fresh paint, chemicals, drugs and numerous other everyday substances have been identified as “triggering” asthma, hay-fever, bronchitis, eczema, dermatitis, re-occurring stomach problems and streaming eyes, as well as migraine headaches, coughing, sneezing, vomiting, diarrhoea, acne and other physical ailments.

Because of the growing incidence and recognition of allergies, it is increasingly suggested that we need to know more about their cause, so that we may know more about their cure.

SO LET’S START BY EXAMINING A TYPICAL PROGRESSION IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ALLERGIES.

The first indication is generally when a person manifests an undesirable, unusual and unexplained physical – or even a mental - reaction.

As examples, the individual feels breathless, or breaks out in a rash, has bouts of sneezing, vomits, has a headache or other pain, feels dizzy or faint, exhibits irrational fear or anger, passes out, or even has more than one symptom occurring at the same time – all for no apparent reason.

If this later becomes recognised as occurring regularly and is suspected to be an allergic reaction to some substance in his or her environment, a search is then undertaken to discover the exact factor or re-stimulator in the surroundings which is triggering the particular symptom or reaction.

Observation, examination and testing is normally expected to eventually discover that a specific factor or factors in the sufferer’s environment is responsible. e.g. in the presence of dogs Bill has breathing problems or, (another example) the smell or taste of boiled milk makes Mary break out in a rash.

Steps are then taken to keep the subject patient away from dogs or boiled milk or whatever has proved to be the ‘trigger’.   Alternatively, medical attempts are made using medicines or drugs to reduce the sensitivity of the subject, or to reduce the impact of the triggering factor on the subject.

Questions might be asked as to why Bill should be affected by dogs in this way when neither his brother nor his sister have the same problem.   And similar questions might be asked as to why Mary should be so affected by boiled milk, when no one else in the family or amongst her friends is similarly distressed.

In fact, if the problem was ‘dogs’ or ‘milk’, then one might expect dogs and milk to have the same effect on everybody.  But they don’t.  So is the problem ‘Bill’ and ‘Mary’ ?  Or is it as a result of something which has earlier happened to Bill involving dogs, and also as a result of something which has earlier happened to Mary involving hot milk ?

In the medical profession anything from ten to fifty percent or more of medical conditions are considered to be ‘psychosomatic diseases’, i.e. illnesses caused by or originating in the mind or psyche - rather than as the result of a direct or immediate effect upon the organism of current infection, contagion, germs, viruses, impacts, injury or other physical causes.

In fact, according to the authoritative, widely used and highly respected “Black’s Medical Dictionary”: “Psychosomatic diseases are illnesses resulting from the effects of excessive or repressed emotions upon bodily function or structure.

They affect vast numbers of patients who are not out of their minds and yet do not have any organic disease to account for their illness.”

And in this dictionary definition we have what to many is clearly a rather accurate description of an allergic reaction.

But the trouble is that as soon as the term “psychosomatic” applies to a particular disease sector, the average physician regrettably tends to leave investigation and treatment of it to psychiatry.

Which unfortunately means that the whole field of psychosomatic disease and investigation of many allergies is left to THE MOST CONFUSED AND INEFFECTIVE BRANCH OF MEDICINE.

Clear signs of this confusion appear in the introduction to psychiatrist Angelina Gibbs’ book "Understanding Mental Health" where she asks: "What is mental illness?".

Which she goes on to answer with: "This is the first of many questions on mental health which cannot be answered conclusively."   "Theories abound" she writes, and in the chapter "What causes mental illness?" she tells us that "Usually only a partial answer can be given because not enough is yet known about the causes of mental illness . . . ."  i.e. about illnesses of the mind.

If one doubts the confusion which exists in psychiatry, one has only to consider the definition of “mind” as given in the authoritative "Dictionary of the Mind, Brain & Behaviour" by the well known psychology Doctor Chris Evans, and the definition of psychiatry itself which concludes as follows:

“The trouble with psychiatry today is that it is still without a working theory, not just of the mind but also the disturbed mind.   Even a definition of mental illness is not easy to come by, so perhaps it is not surprising that to this date psychiatric methods have inevitably been of a hit or miss variety." (ISBN 0 09 918070 07)

And this “hit or miss variety” of medicine is that branch to which the other branches of medicine have delegated the whole field of non-organic, mental and psychosomatic medicine. i.e. likely up to 50% of all human health problems !

But, as we have just learned from the horse’s mouth - the trouble with modern psychiatry is that it is still without a working theory of the mind.  Which is too much like saying: “My son’s a judge, but has a difficult job because there is no agreement on what constitutes the law.”!

An astute doctor might rationalise that the dog (which playfully chased Bill down the field at five years of age and, after he had fallen in the grass, licked his face whilst he was lying crying, frightened, hurt and winded from running) ‘might’ have something to do with Bill’s asthma and pronounce his problem as being a psychosomatic allergic reaction to dogs.

Or a similarly astute doctor might note that when Mary had measles at four years, her grandma – believing that very hot boiled milk was a good old-fashioned measles cure – had insisted on tearfully force-feeding it to her for a whole week saying each time: “Now stop crying”. Resulting in a later aversion to those words and that beverage which would – ‘oddly enough’ - make her break out into a rash not unlike measles.

But now we have another very interesting observation.  Namely that, whilst physicians identify allergies in relation to the so-called ‘lower’ senses – i.e. the taste, touch and / or smell of a given substance – one seldom if ever hears of a person being allergic to the colour or shape of something, or allergic to the sound of something or to a word, statement, tone of voice or noise, etc.

Yet these involve the two ‘higher’ senses of sight and hearing, and one would expect that allergies via these two vital senses would thus have far more influence on a person’s life than allergies concerned only with the “lower” senses.

After all, we regard someone with poor or totally absent hearing or sight as very seriously disabled, but merely sympathise with a person who has a distorted or absent sense of taste, touch or smell which we consider as less of a handicap.

So . . . . are there also allergies to sights and sounds and, if so, how should we recognise / categorise them ?

We earlier started by examining the typical diagnostic progress of an allergy and the business of relating its incidence directly to the reoccurring presence of some physical ‘trigger’ in the subject’s environment, e.g. nuts, eggs, dairy produce, cats, dogs, bed bugs, new mown grass, chemicals, dust-mites, etc., etc., ad infinitum.

But if the trigger were a sight or a sound, are we able to know?   Transient perception available to the subject at the time is not there for a later researcher.

Could it be a visible action of some sort ?  Could it be a word or phrase ?  And we need to ask these questions because we can see that when a stage hypnotist tells his subject “If I touch my tie, you will take off your jacket” - THE SUBJECT ACTUALLY DOES SO !

And when the hypnotist tells his subject “whenever I say “its hot in here”
you will put your jacket back on” - THE SUBJECT DOES SO.

Therefore it definitely could be an action, and it could be a word or phrase.

In fact the mechanism which the hypnotist uses is very like that which takes place in the mind when an allergic reaction crops up.

Some painful, threatening, enforced and unwanted incident in the subject’s earlier life tells him that dogs are dangerous and frightening and that they leave you breathless and crying, and that when dog’s are around you have to get away from them but that because you survived in a breathless and tearful state last time that’s probably a safe state to be in this time.

Not dis-similar to the hypnotist saying: “Whenever there’s a dog present you will get out of breath and your eyes will water” – and the subject does this. And rather similar to the hypnotist saying: “Whenever I say “now stop crying” you’ll break out in a measles-like rash” – and the subject does.

A person becomes capable of being hypnotised under a variety of conditions.

There can be a hypnotist present practising his or her trade . . . .

Or a person can be under the influence of one of the drugs listed as a “hypnotic” in the British National Formulary pharmaceutical “drugs bible”.

Or a person can be tired, poorly from some germ or virus, feeling dizzy from travel or sea-sickness, fainting from hunger, fatigue or lack of sleep, slightly or seriously physically injured, drunk, affected by food poisoning, fully or partly unconscious or generally under the weather, etc.

Drugs and other chemicals which can make you susceptible to verbal and visual suggestions or commands are too numerous to list here, but include: the main ranges of sedatives and sleeping pills, tranquillisers, the benzodiazepines, methadone, buprenorphine, many pain killers, nearly all street drugs (especially heroin and cannabis), alcohol, solvents and even the so-called ‘uppers’ in their hangover stage after their initial stimulative effect has worn off.

We’ve all heard the hypnotist say that he is going to put his subject into a ‘nice sleep’ and that when the subject ‘wakes up’ he will feel wide awake and refreshed and will forget all that has happened between ‘sleeping’ and ‘waking’.

And so the hypnotist’s subject really does not remember what happened to him or her !

Likewise, Bill and Mary do not recall their dog and milk and “now stop crying” incidents.

Like other researchers, if you think about this, you will recognise that the reason the hypnotist can create these sorts of effects is because – knowingly or unknowingly – he is using an existing natural mechanism of the human mind.

The same mechanism which accounts for psychosomatic illnesses including allergies – i.e the Reactive Mind discovered by L. Ron Hubbard.

In the same way that the body is a self-protecting and healing mechanism, so also is the human mind.   But before we look into its self-protection mechanisms and how they can affect our lives, we need to look more closely at what the mind is and does, etc.   Much more closely than psychiatry has ever managed to do.

This is of course psychiatry’s first and most fundamental failure.  Its self-confessed failure to discover the true nature of the healthy mind and its operation.   Pretending instead to be able to deal with so-called ‘mental disorders’, i.e. symptoms assumed by psychiatrists to have their source in the BRAINS of the ‘mentally ill’.

In fact psychiatry is so far away from a scientific understanding of the “mind” and “brain” that it actually confuses “mind” with the “brain”, which of course is merely a flesh and blood extension of the nervous system, a fact which can be verified in any butcher’s shop.  (Somewhat like confusing ‘software’ with computer ‘hardware’.)

The mind is demonstrably:
i) an analytical mechanism which, using identification, comparison and differentiation, poses, observes and resolves problems to accomplish survival of the whole human organism and its controlling beingness, plus

ii) a reactive mechanism which works on a totally stimulus response basis restricted to identification (without analysis) to accomplish the survival of the body alone.  (The ultra-fast motion of removing one’s hand from a hot stove without calculating its temperature is stimulus response).

Both parts of the mind do their ‘thinking’ with mental image pictures of actual experience and the analytical part also uses mental image pictures of imaginable experience to presuppose or postulate future survival.

(For a fully detailed and accurate description of the human mind see: “DIANETICS, the Modern Science of Mental Health” by L. Ron Hubbard, – to which this article is totally indebted.)

Between the analytical and the reactive minds ALL the experiences of the human organism are recorded.  With the analytical mind operating at, and recording, only those times when the organism is awake and in good condition, and with the reactive mind continuously operating and recording, including those times when the body is experiencing actual physical pain, impact, injury and / or unconsciousness, loss, threat, fear, etc., . . . as well as times when the reactive mind is reminded by its environment of earlier physical pain, etc.

At such reactive (i.e. unreasoning) times, the analytical mind is fully or partially shut down, creating the condition of full or partial unconsciousness.   In addition, any tastes, physical touchings, smells, sights and sounds present in the original painful incident can act as allergic triggers attempting to get the individual to move away from the area of restimulation because historically those perceived sensations were earlier associated with pain and / or unconsciousness, etc.

Unconsciousness is thus a full or partial loss of analytical control of the organism leading to full or partial reactive control of the organism.

The organism’s perceptions of its current environment are (subject to normal working of the organs of perception) all essentially recorded in date and time order in three-dimensional animated colour picture form along with sound, taste, touch, smell and action, and any conclusions and speculations made at the time.

These records of perceptions, etc., are made in both the reactive and the analytical minds when the latter mind is in operational control of the organism, but are made in the reactive mind alone when the analytical mind is in a state of unconsciousness or semi-consciousness.  As a result, the analytical mind is basically unaware of the content of the reactive mind, and the recordings in the reactive mind are therefore un-analysed.

Stimulus response mechanisms in animals were first explored by Wundt’s student the Russian veterinarian Pavlov who confined his best known studies to what were essentially the reactive minds of dogs.   These same minds he then mistakenly also attributed to human beings, completely missing the fact that humans normally operate analytically, displaying reactive conduct only when the body is under physical or reactive attack.

The hailing by many, of Wundt as the father of modern psychiatry, was that profession’s second major failure, as it has permitted the generation of the idea that man is a stimulus response zombie-like organism which can be controlled in the same way that Pavlov controlled, motivated and manipulated his dogs, and other researchers manipulated rats.

However such zombie-like response can only be achieved if an individual is kept in a continuing reactive state by the application of hypnosis, drugs, physical pain or discomfort and threats to survival.

It is therefore interesting that Britain’s most prolific pushers of pharmaceutical prescription drugs are psychiatrists, and that their marketing activities have largely involved the hypnotic drug categories and the creation of lifetime addiction via so-called ‘habit management’ and 'behaviour management' based on benzodiazepines, methadone, buprenorphine and other powerfully addictive drugs - all with painful side-effects and / or acutely uncomfortable withdrawal symptoms.

As the reader may well by now have recognised, the allergies of sight and sound mirror those conditions loosely defined as ‘mental illnesses’.  It is a mental not a physical aberration when an individual will remove his jacket because someone else touches his tie.   It is equally a psychosomatic aberration or condition when an individual will go into an asthma attack because a dog is present, or break out in a rash because someone says “now stop crying” and / or offers milk.

No part of the so-called technology of psychiatry has ever consistently produced results which benefited the patient.

Narcotic shock ‘therapy’, Pre-Frontal Lobotomy, E.C.T. (Electric Shock ‘therapy’), leucotomy and Deep Sleep “Therapy”, etc., have over the years contributed more to bringing psychiatry into disrepute than they have to the restoration of sanity and a normal life to its patients.

On the medical TRAINING side, there has long been a close control by the pharmaceutical industry of medical practice in general.   However, just over half a century ago, with street drugs beginning to make their presence felt beyond the actual users, and with governments desperate for solutions to the growing “drugs problem”, the increasing “guidance” or “direction” by “big pharma” of the psychiatric sector started to become more marked, so that today it is without question true that a symbiotic relationship has been reached, and that psychiatry is now the pharmaceutical industry’s prescription drugs marketing arm.

This came just in time to give psychiatry a new lease of life based on a deliberate escalation of the prescribing of pharmaceutical drugs to mental health patients and drug addicts.  The psychiatrists made their contribution to the burgeoning psycho-pharmaceutical relationship by quickly “discovering” more and more “mental conditions” (from a dozen or so to nearly 400 in less than 65 years) all of which luckily ‘proved treatable’ “ONLY” with pharmaceutical drugs - OR SO PSYCHIATRY SAYS !

In fact it is the pharmaceutical industry, plus its expanding range of potent prescription drugs (many of which are unsafe), which today keeps psychiatry in business, whilst in return the American Psychiatric Association invents more and more ‘mental disorders’ for which the pharmaceutical industry can develop treatments based on more and more profitable drugs.

And here we have another of psychiatry’s major failures.  Instead of developing a true science of the mind & instead of totally inappropriately & dangerously applying research on dogs & rats to human beings, psychiatry has grabbed at the chance to be partnered with the wealth, power and influence of pharmacology and the international chemical industry.

The failures of psychiatry are not just:

1) its inability to truly help those with mental disorders.

2) its near total lack of real interest in beneficial results - the benevolence of many (but not all) psychiatrists having been subjugated to their desire for a good income based on a ‘fingers crossed’ dependence on pharmaceutical drug prescribing and,

3) psychiatry’s long-term attempts to rob Britain of truly effective prevention training and real cures by DELIBERATELY SABOTAGING those organisations which can deliver effective prevention and treatment, and which are thus able to expose psycho-pharmacological deceptions.

It is psychiatry which is doing most to usher in the bio-chemical society and thus condemn us all to a life as stimulus response drug controlled zombies. Their goal is a world population all daily dependent on medication or other drugs - SOLELY FOR PSYCHO-PHARMACEUTIC POWER AND PROFIT ! Which brings us back to allergies and “mental disorders” and why they do not get cured.

You will by now have recognised that an allergy is a condition which the sufferer carries with him or her.   An allergy is personal to each sufferer.   It is the sufferer’s mentally programmed personal reaction to a set of environmental circumstances which can occur anywhere and at any time.

Changing the environment does not change that condition.   CHANGING THE SUFFERER’S MIND DOES.

And because the allergies of sight and sound are essentially what we today recognise as “poor Mental Health” the sufferer’s reaction can be changed by a Dianetics practitioner who knows the structure and mechanisms of the mind, and can thus help the individual locate the reactive incident(s) in his or her life which are acting as a hypnotic command triggering past reactions which are inappropriate and irrational for current environmental stimuli.

Please therefore recognise: . . . . that creating good mental health is quick and inexpensive when you know about the reactive mind and how to defeat it.

But instead pharmaceutically grant trained G.Ps currently “treat” (quite unwittingly) bogus mental disorders psychiatrically invented just in order to promote addictive pharmaceutical drugs sales.

IN OVER 50% OF CASES, IT TAKES ONLY ONE 7 TO 14 DAY, 3 TIMES A DAY, DOCTOR'S PRESCRIPTION OF AN ADDICTIVE DRUG (such as Opioid painkillers, Valium or another Benzo, etc.,) TO CREATE A LIFETIME INVOLUNTARY DRUG ADDICT, PAID FOR BY U.K. TAXPAYERS.

As a result, at a cost to the U.K. Taxpayer of £10,000,000 (£TEN MILLION POUNDS) a day, there are four times as many patients FULLY ADDICTED to National Health Service supplied LEGAL pharmaceutical drugs as there are individuals addicted to ILLEGAL recreational drugs !

Recovery from addictive substance use starts with a lasting return to the natural state of relaxed abstinence into which 99% of our population is born.

Such full recovery can be achieved by self-help addiction recovery training, but never by so-called opioid substitution “treatment” !

AND PLEASE REMEMBER:
YOU CAN NEVER BECOME ADDICTED TO A DRUG WHICH YOU NEVER TAKE . . . . BECAUSE IT IS DRUG-TAKING ALONE WHICH CREATES ADDICTION.

Which makes: “SAY “NO” TO DRUGS” the best advice ever given !

PLEASE ALSO REMEMBER:

When you spend N.H.S. budgets on keeping millions of patients daily addicted without cure, you also annually increase the number of patients IN TREATMENT and so increasingly deprive every other part of our N.H.S. and our A&E services of the funds, personnel, premises and equipment they so desperately need.

____________________________________________

This Blog Posted by the:

Society for an Addiction Free Existence

(SAFE)
_____________________________________________



Saturday, 3 June 2017

ACTUALLY CURING INVOLUNTARY ADDICTION TO PRE$CRIBED DRUGS



WHEN FULLY AND CONSISTENTLY APPLIED, THE EXISTING

CURE FOR MEDICALLY CAUSED INVOLUNTARY ADDICTION

TO PRESCRIPTION DRUGS (CURRENTLY SUFFERED BY SOME 3

MILLION N.H.S. PATIENTS), IS EFFECTIVE IN 70+% OF CASES.


It is generally known as “Small-Dose Step-Down Managed Withdrawal”, and is recommended in the authoritative prescribing manual: “British National Formulary” by both the “British Medical Association” and the “Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain”.

Whilst such involuntary addiction to prescribed drugs costs the N.H.S. nearly £3.65 BILLION POUNDS per year (approaching £10 Million A DAY), it is unfortunate that this MOST OFTEN EFFECTIVE addiction recovery procedure IS  SELDOM  IF  EVER  IMPLEMENTED - for two main reasons:

1) The absence of a formally constituted, staffed and funded “Department of Addiction Recovery Management”, able to daily deliver, monitor and administer the necessary dosages to individual involuntarily addicted patients at their personal residences and / or in residential care and nursing homes, and,

2 ) The unjustified, selfish and cruel reluctance (for turnover preservation purposes) of pharmaceutical companies to regularly and widely offer, manufacture or stock the ranges of “small-dose” units of their addictive drugs essential to the success of such an effective withdrawal procedure.

Whilst it might be difficult to conceive that pharmaceutical company's decades of making grants to medical universities, colleges and teaching hospitals was done deliberately in order to create huge numbers of multi-daily prescription dependent state supported addicts,  THAT  IS  NEVERTHELESS  WHAT  HAS  OCCURRED.

And the real absurdity is that the cost of establishing, running and supplying a government “Department of Addiction Recovery Management” would be more than recovered from the National Health Service's DAILY £10 Million of current spending on keeping three million patients in miserable, non-productive zombie-like involuntary addiction !

HERE'S HOW INVOLUNTARY ADDICTION TO PRESCRIPTION DRUGS WAS STARTED, AND CONTINUES TO EXPAND PATIENT BY PATIENT.

The recent demise of John D. Rockefeller does not unfortunately bring to an end probably the biggest and boldest confidence trick ever played (together with the Carnegie Institute) on humanity, the medical profession and national governments.

In the United States of America, up to 1910, the study and practice of medicine left much to be desired.  Some medical qualifications could be obtained via dubious correspondence courses, and many others could be secured with minimum training at short staffed and inadequately qualified medical colleges.

As a result, medicine generally was labouring under an increasingly bad reputation, and the American Medical Association was becoming more and more concerned.

It therefore created a “Council on Medical Education” in order to examine the status of medical training throughout the U.S. and to make proposals for improving not only health education, but also medical practitioner's professional reputations.

However, by 1908, as a result of council member differences and financial poverty, the whole A.M.A. rejuvenation process was grinding to a halt, and it was into this vacuum that the Carnegie / Rockefeller consortium entered with immaculate timing and a superbly simple plan.  The wealthy Carnegie Institute along with the equally rich Rockefeller family essentially represented America's largest chemical combine, and in December of 1908, the Carnegie Institutes’s President offered to take over the whole A.M.A's failed training improvement programme.

To confirm the fact that the new Rockefeller / Carnegie “Foundation” was an impartial body separate from the A.M.A., it was agreed that the Foundation would have “carte blanche” to operate and publish quite independently and without further reference to the A.M.A. Council on Medical Education.

The Rockefeller / Carnegie Foundation immediately began to lavish cash “grants” (eventually amounting in total to hundreds of millions of dollars) on those medical schools, colleges, universities and teaching hospitals which were willing to accept some quite significant control of their training curricula.

As a result, by 1910 the Foundation had effectively invested over a Billion dollars in the 80 or so medical schools which had proved willing to accept Foundation influence and control, and by 1927, some 80 other uncooperative schools had fallen by the wayside mainly because of lack of funding, and the lack of prestige which funding brings.

The net result of all this manipulation was that THE UNITED STATES “OFFICIAL” MEDICAL BASIS WAS CONVERTED OVERWHELMINGLY TO ALLOPATHIC AND / OR PALLIATIVE MEDICAL PRACTICE.

An allopathic physician essentially “cures” by suppressing symptoms.

He or she does not seek to handle the cause of pain or trauma, but prescribes a painkiller or other drug. And palliative medicine is also the practice of “treating symptoms” rather than taking the time or making the effort to look for the cause of any symptoms.

This essentially rules out diagnostic investigations of DIETARY DEFICIENCIES AND EXCESSES, ALLERGIES, BROKEN INJURED OR DISEASED ORGANS OR BODY PARTS, POISONINGS, natural healing and various other possibilities.

When Allopathic and Palliative Medicine appear to “heal”, any such improvement occurs only because Mankind is born with self-healing bodies and minds, and all that the medication has done, in most cases, is to make the symptoms more confrontable by suppressing the body's pain messages.

Unfortunately, pain messages also have useful purposes, which also get suppressed.

Furthermore, many of the prescriptions quickly written today are not just for physical “treatment”, but also for so-called emotional and mental disorders, and, an escalating number of them are for addictive substances which can, in a relatively short time, develop dependency in the patient PLUS involuntary addiction - effectively for life – if not specifically handled with a programme dedicated to withdrawal and cure.

Which brings us back to the undeniable fact that effective addiction recovery procedures are seldom if ever implemented under the Allopathic / Palliative medical regimes overwhelmingly practised today by the U.K. N.H.S.

Regimes deliberately put in place by the international chemical industry to develop their pharmaceutical sector into the biggest, most profitable and expanding provider of investment opportunities for ruthless businessmen and psychiatrists who show no remorse for, and offer no help to, millions of U.K. citizens locked in deliberate addiction for the sake of bigger turnover, profit, dividends, salaries, fees and bonuses.

And the beauty of their conniving and manipulation IS that that extra profit, dividends, bigger salaries, fees and bonuses are all paid for by U.K. Taxpayers !

But the sad thing IS that politicians of all parties have allowed themselves to be drawn into this raping of taxpayers and patients, because the “democratic” system under which they govern does not allow someone with the sort of none palliative expert professional knowledge held by the writer of this article and other natural healing medical experts, to brief them on matters outside Ministers', other MPs' and Civil Servants' limited knowledge and experience.

Matters which are gnawing away at the very foundations of that democratic system.

Authoritative U.S. medical observer & author Edward Griffin summarised the results of the Rockefeller / Carnegie Foundation's “grant generosity” as follows:

“And so it has come to pass that the teaching staff of all our medical schools have become a very special breed.  In the selection and training process, heavy emphasis always has been put on finding individuals who, because of temperament or special interest, have been attracted by the field of . . . . research into pharmacology.

This has resulted in loading the staffs of our medical schools with men and women who, by preference and by training, are ideal propagators of the drug orientated science that has come to dominate American (and now also world) medicine.

And the irony of it is that neither they nor their students are even remotely aware that they are products of a rigid selection process geared to hidden commercial objectives.

So thorough is their insulation from this fact that, even when exposed to the obvious truth, very few are capable of accepting it, for to do so would be a tremendous blow to their professional pride.  Generally speaking, the deeper one is drawn into the medical profession, the more years he has been exposed to its regimens, the more difficult it is to break out of its confines.

In practical terms, this simply means that your doctor probably will be the last person on your Christmas card list to accept the facts presented in this study.”

Dr David L. Edsall was at one time the Dean of the Harvard Medical School.

The conditions he describes at Harvard are the same as those at every other medical school in America.

“I was for a period, a professor of therapeutics and pharmacology, and I knew from experience that students were obliged then by me and by others to learn about an interminable number of drugs, many of which were valueless, many of them useless, some probably even harmful . . . Almost all subjects must be taken at exactly the same time, and in almost exactly in the same way by all students, and the amount introduced into each course is such that few students have time or energy to explore any subject in a spirit of independent interest .

A little comparison shows that there is less intellectual freedom in the medical courses than in almost any other form of professional education in this country.”

At another point in time Edward Griffin stated:

“Yes, he who pays the piper does call the tune.

It may not be humanly possible for those who finance the medical schools to determine what is taught in every minute detail. But such is not necessary to achieve the cartel's desired goals.

One can be sure, however, that there is total control over what is NOT taught, and that, under no circumstances will even one of Rockefeller's shiny dimes ever go to a medical college, to a hospital, to a teaching staff or to a researcher that holds the “unorthodox” view that the best medicine is in nature!

In the meantime, whilst doctors are forced to spend hundreds of hours studying the names and actions of all kinds of man-made drugs, they are lucky if they receive even a portion of a single course on basic nutrition.  Many have none at all.

The result is that the average doctor's wife or secretary knows more about practical nutrition that he does”.

Due to most medical doctor's now “orthodox” single-minded palliative training, a question about “WHAT DEFICIENCY CAUSES IT?” wouldn't even cross his or her mind - because they have been comprehensively trained to think otherwise.

Dr Gabor Lenkei M.D. the famous Hungarian author of: “Censored Health” - “ON THE ASSEMBLY LINE OF THE DISEASE INDUSTRY”, wrote:

“These are serious accusations, but nonetheless true.  It is even harder to read such lines as a medical doctor.   It also took me months to come to terms with the truth.  It wasn't easy to accept that I had been blind.  And at the time I wasn't even making a living from my medical practice.

The realisation that I had been taken for a fool shocked me.   I had unwittingly become a summa cum laude (graduated with highest honours) agent for the pharmaceutical industry.

As a student, I had naively dived into medicine. I wanted to heal people. I accepted without reservation that whatever I was taught was the best possible way of healing, the best possible recipe for success.

It didn't even cross my mind that some other procedures might exist that could produce better results.   After all, what I studied was medicine – wasn't it ?  Later I started to have doubts.  I realised they had only shown me one side of the coin, and left me ignorant about things I should have known.”

As a preamble to the way in which, over the last century, medicine has changed throughout the western world, Dr Paul Starr authored a fascinating book called: “Social Transformation of American Medicine“, about how the profession which is intended to be dedicated to healing has gradually turned into a lucrative mainly pharmaceutical business, with commercial goals superseding by far those detailed in the Hippocratic oath and intended to be practised in G.P's consulting rooms and surgeries.

He gives a clear explanation of how, during their training and internship years, the practice of healing was taken away from medical doctors who thus became mere tools in the hands of greedy chemical manufacturers and financially orientated psychiatrists.

Readers of Starr's book can see the step by step process of transformation, and a medical culture that has coined more and more money and produced less and less health.   Studying the book, allows us to find out why healing activities get contaminated with corruption and a thirst for money, and how physicians were misled and betrayed, simply by telling them only one side of the healing story.

Griffin also holds no grudge against mistaught medical professionals and states:

“Drug houses bombard the market with so many new drugs each year, that the physician often does not know how effective are the drugs he prescribes.   All he knows is that he has seen them advertised in the A.M.A. (or B.M.A.) Journal, has been handed a “fact sheet” by a “detail man” representing the company which manufactures the drugs, and may have had some limited or qualified success with them on a few of his previous patients.

Because he is a practitioner – not a researcher – he cannot conduct controlled experiments to determine the relative effectiveness of the new drugs as compared to the old or with similar drugs available through another drug firm.   All he knows is that “they seem to help some of his patients”.   If the first drug prescribed does not bring about the desired results, then he will issue a new prescription and “try something else”.

(And his parting comment to his patient regularly echoes that of drug-pushers of illicit drugs around the world: “See how you get on with this”.)

“Of course, there is nothing about this procedure which is improper from the physician's point of view.  He is doing only what he can to help his patients by making available to them what he has been told is the latest technology in the field of drugs.  Remember, it is not he who makes a profit from writing the prescription.

There is no questioning the fact that the doctor serves as an extremely effective salesman for a multi-billion dollar drug industry, but he is not paid (by the pharmaceutical industry) for this vital service.

He has been trained for it however.  Through the curricula within the world's leading medical schools, students are exposed to such an extensive training in the use of drugs (and practically none in the field of nutrition, allergies, fasting and natural health, etc.) that, upon graduation, they quite naturally turn to the use of drugs as the 'professional treatment of choice' for practically all of Man's ills.”

Nutritional deficiencies, excesses and allergies, fasting and natural health, etc., are just not considered by them.  Because nobody ever taught them these things !

What the founders of the Rockefeller empire had recognised was that, whilst both “physical fitness” and “mental health” are some of the most precious assets for 99% of the population, these subjects are essentially a mystery to that same majority of the world's population, who are therefore to a major degree - gullible.

Thus, and especially because of the addictive properties of many drugs, they saw prescribing as ripe for massive low cost, long term exploitation, ESPECIALLY within a National Health Service financed by a country's Taxpayers !

QUITE UNBELIEVABLE REALLY !

And it is this “unbelievable factor” which has made the build-up of all forms of drug addiction, psychiatric mental health labelling and the financial crippling and controlling of the U.K's N.H.S. a devastating fact of life.

It is not only today's doctors, G.Ps, physicians and independent high street chemists who have been sucked into this lie.  It is also the guardians of democracy – our Ministers, M.Ps and Civil Servants who have been sucked in by the greatest Press and Public Relations machine in the world today.

An earlier master of “P.R.” - Goebbels, the Nazi Minister of Propaganda, apparently once said:-

If I tell a lie once, ten people will believe it.
If I tell it twice, a hundred persons will believe it.
If I say it three times it will be accepted by a thousand, and,
If I repeat it four times, even I start to believe it.

What the psycho-pharmaceutical fraternity have so successfully added to the above to bring pressure on our country' decision-makers are promotional flattery, bribery and blackmail of every conceivable type.

PLUS, in respect of any competition, alternative or other healing solutions, they have widely and continuously used devastating overt, covert, direct and indirect, attacks, criticisms, denials, ridicule, black-balling, side-lining, constant derision, secret political onslaughts and destructive marginalisation to viciously and falsely discredit them.

And to make sure that those of our political decision-makers, who have previously supported them, will be reluctant to change their minds, the psycho-pharmaceutical manipulators of our economy, our society and our budgets have even managed to build-in a truly inspired “loss of face” factor.

In the same way that a majority of physicians are extremely reluctant to admit they “might have been short-changed or conned during their training years”, politicians, seeking to impress the electorate and their party leaders, are understandably even more reluctant to admit they “might just perhaps” have been manipulated on an even grander scale than the medical profession and our Taxpayers.

So whilst this briefing concerns itself with “Actually Curing Involuntary Addiction to Prescribed Drugs”, that cure is technically and logistically a relatively simple task compared with rescuing our politicians from the controlled condition it has taken Rockefeller & Co a century and countless billions of dollars to bring them to.

But it can be done, given the full, frank and proper informing of persons senior enough in our decision-making hierarchy to be above blaming themselves for being outwitted by determined, calculating, cold-hearted, selfish, lying manipulators, who don't care if they destroy other peoples' careers and lives in order to further their own vast fortunes.

And because involuntary addiction to prescription drugs is such a massive drain on the Exchequer, by starting to cure it, politicians will soon start to save enough money to be able to comfortably afford to cure it.

In other words, by so blatantly building a confidence swindle so massively expensive for the Government and the economy, the psycho-pharms have at the same time provided Government with a source of cost-saving capable of giving Britain the funds it now needs to successfully see an addiction free society through to fruition.

WHAT SUCCESS ?

A relatively drug-free society, with MILLIONS of patients released from cold-turkey control and misery, and a Government released from massive N.H.S. addiction wasted expenditure.

An educated Government which is no longer being conned into converting Drug-Baron created addicts into even more taxpayer supplied and funded lifelong prescription addicts.

But don't just take my word for it. Go to the Internet and look up: Dr. Michael Colgan, Adelle Davis, Dianetics, Edward G. Griffin, Albert Szent-Gyorgyi, Dr. Gabor Lenkie MD, Linus Carl Pauling, Dr. Matthias Rath, Dr. Thomas Szasz, The Citizen's Commission on Human Rights and the numerous world writers on “Natural Health”, scientific laboratory health-testing, diagnoses of causes, the origin and causes of allergies and the truth about psycho-somatic influences.

But, Here Comes The Important Bit !

HOW

TO NOW ACTUALLY START IMPLEMENTING AN EFFECTIVE CURE FOR INVOLUNTARY ADDICTION TO PRE$CRIBED MEDICAL DRUGS.

From the above, it will be seen that the real problem in regard to helping the millions of involuntary addicts quit their habit and avoid the side-effects of their “medication” is the fact that the pharmaceutical industry (which is well equipped to sponsor and help gradual withdrawal procedures) is the very same commercial operation which has as its main goal the procurement of increasing usage of as many of their addictive products as possible by an increasing number of people.

Consequently, so-called “self-regulation” by the psycho-pharms is never ever going to produce a better result than the time wasting “medication-sustaining” lip-service to which politicians have been subjected by the psycho-pharms over the last 69 years.

These manipulative ploys have included, amongst others:

a) the whole countrywide 65 years of “never-ever-intended-to-cure” Opioid Substitution Therapy (methadone, etc.),
b) the 5 years incestuous “National Treatment Outcome Research Study” of psychiatric “treatments” - CONDUCTED SOLELY BY PSYCHIATRISTS THEMSELVES WITHOUT final useful report of the huge level of failure of such psychiatric “so-called treatment” results or “outcomes” - and,
c) the recent failed 4 year psychiatric “piloting” of “Payment by Results” in the drug recovery sector, which has deliberately aborted implementation of that brilliant current Drugs Strategy, because treatment with drugs cannot and does not cure !

As a result of these persistent psycho-pharm efforts to avoid any reduction in the increasingly vast numbers of U.K. citizen’s addicted to their products, it is vital that “Reduction of Involuntary Addiction” is (for obvious reasons) conducted as a totally separate government initiative which does NOT involve psychiatrists and only peripherally involves pharmacists – under tight regulation.

Proposals are set out in the next pages for the formation by the Government of:

Addiction Withdrawal Advisory Services & Help

(“AWASH”)

a special national & local recovery department for involuntarily addicted patients - independent of psychiatry and pharmacology.

Obviously 3 million involuntary addicts who stop taking an average of over 1,095 expensive medical drug doses a year will create a cash saving more than enough to pay for the whole AWASH scheme and for further N.H.S economies.

HOW TO ESCAPE FROM THE U.K’S PRESENT MASSIVELY EXCESSIVE OVER-USAGE OF ADDICTIVE PRESCRIPTION AND OTHER DRUGS:

After issuing the order to “Stop Engines”, because the inertia is so great, it takes several miles of further travel for a Captain to bring a modern oil super-tanker to a full stop.

And over the last 60 plus years of “patient management” by long-term prescription medication, the pharmaceutical companies, and their psychiatric and medical marketing arms have developed the pill-popping treatments of our NHS into a nearly unstoppable “health service” methodology, whereby just stopping the prescribing of any drug to the hundreds of thousands and even millions of its present users has been deliberately calculated to cause chaotic protest, and thus preserve their turnover.

BUT, the definition of an “EFFECTIVE” drugs policy is one which continuously moves a society or community in the direction of total abstinence - i.e. it is not a society totally without drugs, but is a society whose policy is to continuously move our communities towards becoming a society free of ADDICTIVE drugs.

And the action needed to progress towards that is NOT just to stop dead all the current prescribing of existing patients under such management ‘treatment’.

There are three main steps:

1) STOP EXPANDING THE CURRENT LIST OF PATIENTS BEING PRESCRIBED SUCH SUBSTANCES IN RESPECT ONLY OF SYMPTOMS.

i.e. allow no new consumers of such substances to be prescribed by any doctors, psychiatrists or other physicians UNTIL laboratory and other testing plus full cause diagnosis has been done and sufficient time for any initial physical or mental trauma has elapsed, to permit the natural healing processes to start taking effect.

Depending on the nature of their patent’s trauma this will likely be a non-prescribing period of from 2 to 4 weeks.

2) Establish Residential Addiction Recovery AWASH Training Centres in each local county area, so that AWASH Recovery Workers who will Manage known existing addicted PATIENTS of all types (i.e. those currently addicted to licensed AND prescription drugs) may be trained in already proven effective self-help addiction recovery technology.

3) Expand the residential and training facilities at the centres established at
2) above, so that they may also accept for training and self-help curing on a Payment
by Results basis those addicts seeking help to escape from addiction to illicit drugs and alcohol on a self or family funded basis.

The training for the above steps has been successfully practised since 1966 and is now available at scores of centres in 49 countries, offering training for recovery from all forms of substance addiction.

70 to 75% of addicts of all types are ready and able to quit their drugs habit, and are so willing that the vast majority of them have already tried to quit hundreds of times (often daily), and although having failed on every occasion, still want to try again.

Their problem is therefore not intention.  It is that they just don’t know HOW TO, which is why effective and proven addiction recovery training is their salvation.

For users of “street” drugs this is delivered in 13 weeks on a residential programme, and normally shows a 60 to 69+% success rate first time through with (out of those who failed) up to 5 to 20% more succeeding on a second shorter refresher course.

(In a few cases, where there are domestic and family circumstances which permit it, the same technology in respect of the initial withdrawal procedures can be applied with interventionist assistance to an addict by his or her family at their home.)

Which brings us back to the main N.H.S. patient addiction recovery problem mentioned on the previous pages.  It is the “main problem” because for every individual addicted to illegal street drugs, there are a dozen people involuntarily addicted to legally prescribed pharmaceutical drugs - paid for by taxpayers - and their legal addiction can sometimes be even more devastating, life spoiling and controlling than criminal addiction to most of the illegal drugs.

Whilst the total cost to the Exchequer of providing and delivering 3 to 4 doses a day of those drugs to which patients have become involuntarily addicted is certainly higher - for the following costing example we have calculated only a mere £1.00 per dose and only 3 doses a day. i.e. a minimum cost of £1,095 per year per patient, which includes not only the drugs but also their prescribing and dispensing, etc.

On the other hand, 2 to 3 months (max 13 weeks) of an average of twice a week 45 minute visits by a trained and licensed AWASH Recovery Worker - managing a client list of twenty recovering addicts - is going to cost well under £500 per cured addict on a once only basis, even if the AWASH Worker follows up on a once a month basis for up to six months after the patient is cured.

With:
a) an annual total cost for each AWASH Recovery Worker of maximum £40,000,
b) a current U.K. involuntarily addicted client list of some millions, and with
c) each AWASH Worker creating savings of over £47,600 per year by
d) each withdrawing 80 clients a year, we would need 2,000 trained AWASH Workers to cure the present list of addicts in 19 years.  (That's how serious the problem is !)

Whilst doing this, those 2,000 AWASH Workers would together save the U.K. Tax-payers an ADDITIONAL £15.2 MILLION per year over and above their own AWASH costs, so that in the whole 19 years (assuming no new patients become involuntarily addicted) there would be an EXTRA saving of over £288.8 MILLION.

In other words, the indicated AWASH “involuntarily addicted recovery programme”, whilst curing N.H.S. patients, will not only pay the full cost of running its own department and programme, but will also make a healthy annual contribution to the N.H.S. and Chancellor of the Exchequer’s treasury for other anti-addiction purposes.

HOW MANY OTHER STATE SPONSORED INITIATIVES CAN DO THAT ?
AND LOOK HOW LITTLE IS THE LEGISLATION REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE IT:

All that is needed is for the Government to rule that addictive or other dependency developing pharmaceutical drugs will only be licensed for production in the manufacturer's recommended dosages, so long as (in order to make step-down withdrawal possible) they also produce and deliver FREE OF CHARGE at least another 5 small dosage sizes equivalent to the following percentages of their recommended doses:
                                              1%, 2.5%, 5%, 10% and 20%.

These apply to pills, tablets, powder and liquid capsules and other liquid doses.

If pharmaceutical producers also wished to help further by providing “charge-able” dose sizes of 30%, 40% and 50%, this would obviously make precisely measured step-down withdrawal prescription writing even simpler and quicker.

BUT, HAVE NO DOUBT ABOUT IT !

Without wide and low cost availability of these small doses, the curing of pharmaceutically caused involuntary addiction will go on being totally frustrated at increasingly massive cost to our whole society and our economy.

SO . . . . ISN’T THE ABOVE WORTH FURTHER INVESTIGATING ?

To Find Out More About How To Actually Cure

Involuntary and Other Addiction

Phone: (01342) 811099, or E-mail: keneck@btinternet.com


PLEASE RECOGNISE:

No-One Can Ever Become Addicted To A Drug Or To Medication They Never Take.
BECAUSE IT IS THE DRUG ITSELF WHICH CAUSES ADDICTION.

And please remember, we take drugs only because we are wrongly advised
or wrongly believe that they will solve a problem !
______________________________________________

This report has been prepared by:


S.A.F.E.

 
the

Society for an Addiction Free Existence
______________________________________________