THIS WEEK'S NEWS

TELLS US ABOUT A 52 YEAR OLD
WOMAN WHO, ALTHOUGH TOTALLY
UNTRAINED AND UNQUALIFIED, 
SUCCESSFULLY POSED AS A BRITISH
PSYCHIATRIST FOR 22 YEARS.

The question is NOT: "How did she get away with it?", but is: "Why did other U.K. psychiatrists not quickly spot her lack of mental health skills?"

And the answer is - because she was doing what 90% of all U.K.  psychiatrists also do every day with little or no mental health skills.

Using a copy of the psychiatric diagnostic "bible" (The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) (the DSMMD) and a copy of the prescribing "bible" (The British National Formulary) (the BNF), she wrote prescriptions for highly profitable addictive pharmaceutical drugs to be supplied by the National Health Service and paid for by British Taxpayers.

Day after day, for 22 years, just like most other U.K. psychiatrists do to please their pharmaceutical friends and occasional employers.

But didn't her lack of training expose her ?

No, that was'nt noticed, because she was doing just the same as the majority of U.K. psychs.

What exposed her, was an attempt to defraud one of her patients of her wealth, which was spotted by a legal adviser.

The reason her lack of qualifications didn't expose her was because, whilst she lacked the usual psych training based on experiments on millions of mice, millions of rats and Pavlov's dogs, etc., (most of which has nothing to do with writing prescriptions for addictive drugs) she was still performing like a good little psychiatrist.      

It is fascinating that some 400 "Mental Disorders" listed in the "DSMMD" can all be "managed" or "treated" (BUT NOT CURED) by a few dozen profitable addictive drugs listed in the "BNF".  And because they are not cured, those prescriptions continue (without any expensive marketing) to go on dosing patients for life !

What is really exposed by this pseudo psychiatric practitioner is the equally false nature of psychiatric so-called "technology".  

A pseudo-science developed out of experiments on animals, half dead concentration camp prisoners and already insane asylum inmates, and as a result, totally inapplicable to ordinary man-and-woman-in-the-street sane human being.

As a result, when a Modern Science of Mental Health, based on researching with normal human beings capable (unlike animals) of communicating with researchers, was released to the public in 1950, there was immediate recognition that Man is NOT an animal but is another species with a different mental and spiritual anatomy.

It is not the massive strength of elephants, the speed of the wild cat families or the agility of other animals that rules the world.  It is the relatively puny bodies of Man, with his superior personality and analytical mental abilities who rules the animal kingdoms, as well as a great part of the material world.

Unfortunately however, animal based Psychiatry also rules the Mental Health sector of Man's medical world.  Not because it is in any way whatsoever effective, helpful, healing or curative for Mankind, but because it was FIRST in the mental health field !

The PHYSICAL health services, technology and treatments available at the time of the formation in 1948 of the National Health Service has, over the last 70 years progressed and developed out of all recognition, and today delivers results not dreamed possible at that time.

But MENTAL health services, technology and treatments have since 1948 changed and developed in only one direction.  Psychiatrists have "discovered" (in fact "invented") an extra 350 "mental disorders".  And, along with these "new" (really weird) disorders, new prescriptions to "manage" the new disorders.

The prescriptions being essentially dictated to them by their pharmaceutical drug producing "partners".

Of course, it way well prove likely that our female pseudo-psychiatrist has done us all a favour in exposing what U.K. psychiatrists in general are doing to maximise drug addiction amongst our population, so that they may go on earning their regular renewal prescription fees and the acknowledgement of their Big-pharma allies.

One thing it really does confirm is that addiction is never an accident.  It is a deliberate marketing strategy planned to create an irresistible demand with no further promotional costs.

 __________________________________

This briefing was prepared by

the U.K.

Society for an Addiction Free Existence.

(S.A.F.E.)

 __________________________________

THE B.N.F.

BRITISH NATIONAL FORMULARY

 
SMALL-DOSE STEP-DOWN

 

ADDICTION WITHDRAWAL

MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE

 
PROVES TO BE ABSOLUTE

PHARMACEUTICAL P.R. BULL

**** - DONE TO AVOID LOSING

HIGHLY PROFITABLE EASY

ADDICTIVE DRUG SALES !

Physicians and G.Ps everywhere are increasingly worried about the escalating INVOLUNTARY ADDICTION of millions of patients to the drugs which Doctors' training in palliative medicine is inflicting on N.H.S. public across the U.K.

To cope with this problem, many G.Ps turn to the "Prescription Bible" - "The British National Formulary" - to implement its recommended Small-Dose Step-Down Addiction Withdrawal Management Procedure.

This can be very effective and entails cutting the patients' addictive drug doses by 2.5 to 5% every 7 to 14 days or more, in order to give them a reasonably comfortable gradient reduction routine with little or no "cold turkey" withdrawal symptoms or side-effects.

BUT, there is a major barrier to applying this life improving rescue.

"INVOLUNTARY ADDICTION" IS A MAJOR SOURCE OF PHARMA-CEUTICAL TURNOVER AND EASY PROFIT, WHICH DOESN'T EVEN NEED EXPENSIVE PROMOTION, BECAUSE THE ADDICTED VICTIMS LITERALLY BEG FOR ANY MISSING DOSES WITHIN A FEW HOURS - THE ADDICTION ITSELF CREATING THEIR DEMAND, DAY AFTER DAY.

As a result, pharmaceutical production companies have no desire what-

so-ever to lose this massive easy turnover and profit which has been built up over years, mainly by psycho-pharm prescribing strategies.

So, what do pharmaceutical manufacturers do to preserve their profits ?

They very simply take every possible step to AVOID MAKING AVAILABLE THE SMALL DOSES WHICH ARE ESSENTIAL TO THE LIFE SAVING STEP-DOWN WITHDRAWAL PROCEDURE.

This means that any G.P. or other physician or dispenser who wants to help a patient / victim suffering the side effects of involuntary addiction, must attempt to do so by chopping into smaller doses the manufacturers "recommended" dose sizes.

However, whilst for example a 100mg tablet can usually be cut into four 25mg pieces, going smaller is nearly impossible.   Furthermore, if the manufacturer's recommended dose is in capsule form, one might with care be able to do something to halve a powder capsule, but dividing up a liquid capsule is truly impossible !

AS A CONSEQUENCE, MOST MEMBERS OF THE ABPI (THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BRITISH PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY) HAVE - FOR THE MOST SELFISH AND RUTHLESS REASONS - DELIBERATELY MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR BOTH N.H.S. AND PRIVATE PATIENTS EVER TO RECOVER FROM THEIR ADDICTIONS.

. . . . and they have cleverly done it by actually "DOING NOTHING" - something for which they consider they cannot really be blamed !

So they will say: "We make recommended doses to Royal Pharmaceutical Society standards", and "we don't really get asked for other sizes".  So why go to the trouble of making them, stocking them and distributing them - all of which is extra trouble and expense for our already over-burdened N.H.S.

BUT, the N.H.S. is over-burdened BECAUSE OF INVOLUNTARY ADDICTION, and, in order to eradicate it, we need a range of smaller doses of all addictive and dependency forming pharmaceutical drugs.

To achieve this, it only requires Ministers to rule that the production of any "recommended" doses of any addictive drug is accompanied by parallel production, stocking, distribution and dispensing of the following short range of smaller sizes at prices to the N.H.S. no higher than the manufacturers' "recommended" sizes.  Small range: 0.5%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 5%, 10% and 50%.

A helpful manufacturer would make life easier for dispensers by also offering 20%, 30% and 40% doses.

 

Obviously pharmaceutical producers and their allies would fight this sort of essential legislation in every overt and covert way possible, but the millions and millions of patients returned to normal relaxed abstinent living and the £BILLIONS the N.H.S. would save the U.K. taxpayers, are much stronger and far more humane arguments than lost dividends and threats to move pharma production out of Britain - as the ABPI threatened only 18 months ago.

SUBSTANCE ADDICTION of all types is the greatest threat which our country faces as we move out of Europe and into Brexit style existence.

Food addiction driven obesity plus tobacco addiction are the two main causes of cancer, and addiction to alcohol, smuggled drugs and (the biggest threat) addiction to prescription drugs, all incapacitate and reduce our productive population and impose ever increasing loads on the rest of the economy.

It therefore requires that Ministers and Officials DO NOT give-in to big-pharma demands, as did last year's Health Secretary when he launched legislation for "Transforming Children's and Young People's Mental Health Provision", which will deliver up to 18 million pupils and students in the age range 5 to 25 - into involuntary addiction, with no scientifically provable benefit, likely for life, at Taxpayer expense, and for Psycho-Pharm profit !

Nice one Jeremy !  If he condemns his children and ours to very likely be drug addicts, solely because the ABPI "demands with threats" that the N.H.S. spends £20 BILLION MORE every year on prescribing psychiatric drugs.

That's an EXTRA £55 MILLION a day - all to be paid for by U.K. Taxpayers, on top of the £15 MILLION a day they ALREADY pay solely for addictive prescription drugs for already involuntarily addicted mainly elderly patients !

Pharmaceutical Directors probably toast Jeremy's health in champagne at Board Meetings, and in light of the thousands of extra Psychiatrists his successor has been instructed to appoint in schools, colleges, universities and all G.P. surgeries, Mr Hunt will probably soon receive a Knighthood, as well as an Honorary Doctorate of Psychiatry.

However, the latter is unlikely to handle the former Secretary of State for Health's apparent condition of early onset Dementia, demonstrated by his confusion and irrationality !

After all, psychiatric "Mental Health Provision" and its virtual "Government by Addiction" will do nearly as much damage to Britain every year, as did Nazi Hitler in each year of the Second World War, but unfortunately, we no longer have Winston Churchill and his condemnations of Psychiatrists to ward off their vastly damaging animal researched theories and practices !

Tobacco and Alcohol producers centuries ago made addictive smoking and addictive drinking an accepted commonplace everyday social activity, something which the pharmaceutical industry have envied for decades.

Today, the over-arching plan of much of the Pharmaceutical production industry is to make three times a day addictive drug taking - in the guise of "Mental Health Provision" - as normal as breakfast, lunch, tea and coffee, BUT paid for by Taxpayers rather than by the addicts - because psychiatrists and palliative drug prescribing G.Ps tell everyone that "additive drugs are good for you" - even better than tobacco and booze !

____________________________________

This Report Researched and Prepared by

S.A.F.E.

the U.K.

Society for an Addiction Free Existence

_____________________________________