Showing posts with label curing addction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label curing addction. Show all posts

Thursday, 28 July 2016

Handling Addiction in the Workplace.



RECOGNISING THE EFFECTIVE AND

  INEXPENSIVE SOLUTION TO

EMPLOYERS' ADDICTION PROBLEMS.


Because for centuries alcoholism has been a worldwide problem and because for 90 years psychiatric and pharmaceutical marketing has been falsely proclaiming that drug addiction is basically incurable, consultancy advice to employers has been increasingly focussed on and limited to the employer's “legal vulnerability” under employment law, rather than on any realistic and compassionate solution capable of procuring an economic eradication of the firm's and the employee's own joint addiction problems.

Of course all employers should know their relevant Health and Safety requirements as well as the legal arguments for protecting their organisation against claims from employees, unions and officialdom, so that the first step is to have clearly stated unassailable addiction policies in place which are known to all by virtue of being part of each and every employment contract.

Guidance into the basics of what goes into employment contracts is available from the Chartered Management Institute, the Institute of Directors and other similar employer organisations, but, because of the aforementioned circulation of false information about the “non-curability” of addiction, many otherwise valuable information sources are devoid of accurate and viable information on U.K. based addiction recovery TRAINING programmes, so that many addiction policy statements throw the baby out with the bathwater when it comes to handling a skilled and valuable employee who may have become a victim of addiction.

The first action choice varies from one industry to another, but is most often the attitude made famous by Trump and Sugar: “you're fired”. However, if this route is followed, it is essential to handle the matter in a fair and professional manner, with adequate proofs of addiction allegations, in order to avoid claims of unfair or contrived dismissal and resultant compensation claims or even union action.

The second action choice is usually seen as disciplinary, combined with offering guidance on where rehabilitation may be obtained and even granting a suitable period of leave of absence in which to undertake the rehabilitation. This can work in some cases of early discovery, but not often if the employee is already a dedicated addict – simply because the addictive substance is now controlling that employee's life – not him or her self, AND because few addicts have the financial resources available for the 11 to 13 weeks required to procure a satisfactory result.

However, the modern employer action choice in enlightened countries and businesses is (at employer cost) to send the addicted individual for residential self-help addiction recovery training - especially if the skills and experience of the particular employee are considered of value to the firm's future productivity and success.

And fortunately it is now clear that, IN A MAJORITY OF CASES, this can be the employer's most economical action choice – provided he chooses the right sort of addiction recovery self-help training programme rather than one of the bog standard “treatment” rehabs offered and priced on a short term attendance basis of 8 to 10 weeks at anything from £1,500 to £3,800 per week. (i.e. from £12,000 to £38,000).

With the cost of recruiting and training the average new or replacement staff member reported by Oxford Economics as approaching £31,000 and with the cost of replacing a diector or senior manager much higher, successful addiction recovery training at £25,000 (which in 70+% of cases delivers a lasting return to the natural state of relaxed abstinence into which 99% of the population is born) is clearly a bargain solution, especially when a fully supportive employer soon discovers there is no more grateful, loyal and productive worker than an employee rescued from addiction by his boss.

50 years of delivering residential self-help addiction recovery training in 49 countries at nearly 100 training centres (including prison units) demonstrates that this is the only regularly viable route to lasting relaxed abstinence available to all employees, both salaried and wage earning.

Furthermore, some residential self-help addiction recovery training centres will even accept addicts on a “Payment by Results” basis.

Although likely to be some 15% higher priced, PbR has the advantage of costing the employer only as little as £9,000 in the event that the addict fails to fully recover from his or her addiction.

To arrange an inspection visit to an East Sussex addiction recovery training centre with an opportunity to meet staff as well as students:

you may wish to phone (01342) 810151 or 811099
between 11.00am and 10.00pm
most days of the week except Sundays,
or e-mail keneck@btinternet.com any time.


S.A.F.E. Is A Not-For-Profit Community Support Group Forme In 1975.


__________________________________________________________________________ 

Wednesday, 27 July 2016

Self-Help Addiction Recovery Training

 

LEARNING TO CURE
 

YOURSELF OF
 

DRINK & DRUG

 
ADDICTION.


BASED ON 50 YEARS OF INTERNATIONAL SUCCESS.


As you may well have noticed, you can't live somebody else's life for them, and equally, nobody else can live your life for you.

So that, whether we like it or not, life is a do-it-for-yourself activity.

This means that becoming addicted to drink or drugs is also mainly a do-it-for-yourself activity AND ALSO that escaping from addiction is something you must do-for-yourself, provided you know how to go about it.

A self-help residential programme of addiction recovery training for lasting relaxed abstinence is vastly different from other addiction rehab systems because, instead of offering “treatment”, it “TRAINS” addicts in HOW TO CURE THEMSELVES.

And it is the many differences in a self-help training programme which make all the difference to the results which such programmes obtain first time through in from 55 to 69+% of cases.

The FIRST Difference: between a self-help training programme and other forms of rehabilitation is found in such programme's view of the individual addict who is regarded as an “addiction victim” and designated as a “STUDENT” rather than as a “patient”, a “client”, a “bum”, a “criminal”, a misuser, an abuser or a “service user”.

An “addicted patient” for psychiatrists and pharmaceutical producers is a client with an addictive demand who should be “treated” by doing something “TO” him or her in order to have that addict as a consumer of substitute addictive medication for as long as U.K., taxpayers via the NHS, will go on paying for prescribed supplies of drugs such as methadone and Subutex, etc.

The definition of a “criminal drug user” varies from country to country and from time to time, but the intention and effect of the “criminal” label is to punish what any particular jurisdiction currently regards as a crime – which in practice across the world can mean anything from being given a caution or being sentenced to a fine, imprisonment, a whip lashing or even execution !

And interestingly, the above “criminal” view of addiction is usually concerned only with smuggled, stolen, illegal and designer drugs, and so does not include the vast majority of addictive substances such as licensed ALCOHOL and prescribed MEDICAL drugs – each of which are vastly bigger problems than smuggled, stolen, illegal and designer drugs.

The defining of an addict as a “student” recognises four things:

a) That 70 to 75% of all drink and drug addicts who have been using for more than 3 weeks, 3 months, 3 years or 30 years desperately want to quit, and although they have thus tried and failed on numerous occasions (often daily) to do so, they nevertheless have no lack of willingness to stop. Their problem is simply and actually “finding out HOW to stop”.

b) That – (because life is obviously and inescapably a “do-it-for-yourself” activity) – addiction is NOT just about a chemical substance but is a condition permitted by the individual's lack of a real understanding of life, mainly brought about by misinformation & lies from vested commercial interests in the massive alcohol and medical supply businesses, as well as from criminal sources.
 
c) That an addict is no longer in total charge of his or her life and so wishes to again take control, and,

d) That, to again take control of his or her life, an addict needs training in self-help addiction recovery techniques, with which they can concurrently procure lasting relaxed abstinence for themselves, and thus thereafter be able to easily apply what they have learned - for life.
 
So the first vital difference is that a self-help programme does not “treat” drug addicts, nor does it transfer addicts from one addictive substance to another as in so called Opioid Substitution Therapy where addicts are moved from illegal heroin to legally prescribed but more addictive methadone or Subutex, thus basically ensuring they remain as prescription drug addicts for life.

Self-help instead TRAINS THEM to cure themselves !

GIVE A MAN A FISH, AND YOU FEED HIM FOR A DAY.
BUT, TEACH HIM HOW TO FISH, AND YOU FEED HIM FOR LIFE.

This is the difference between treatment in most rehabs and training in self-help addiction recovery.

Give a heroin addict methadone and you satisfy his habit for that one day. But teach him HOW to take control of and get rid of his habit, and you give him the gift of recovery of the natural state of relaxed abstinence into which he was born, and which he can then maintain.

Which brings us to self-help's very different recognition of “WHY” addiction occurs.

SECOND Difference: Psychiatrists, psychologists, politicians, social workers and police, etc., assign a large variety of reasons as to why an individual becomes an addict. They ignore completely the fact that the UK's largest group of addicts (over 2 million) are NHS patients prescribed into involuntary addiction by the medical profession, and instead blame “peer pressure”, wanting a “thrill” or a “high”, irresponsibility, lawlessness, recklessness, criminal inclination, misuse and numerous other “possible” causes.

But for centuries medicine, alcohol and drugs have been used to solve problems, and that is still the reason for their usage today. For certain heart problems we take aspirin, for a headache or toothache we take paracetamol or some other pain killer, for the problem of travel sickness we take another tablet, for the problem of shock or family loss we are prescribed Valium or another “benzo” drug, and to solve shyness or anxiety many take spirit alcohol or another chemical stimulant, etc.

And it is the misinformation and even downright lies which are used to make the guy (who has what he “considers” a problem) use an addictive drug in order to solve it.

In fact, Mary Wakefield the deputy editor of the “Spectator” once commented that the pharmaceutical industry has grown into possibly the largest industry in the world by manufacturing “A Pill for Every Ill”.

“Drugs solve problems” - or so we are told from an early age, not only by psycho-pharms, but also by Grandma, Dad & Mum, our local doctor and even the local pub barman.

It is therefore not at all surprising to find self-help students finding and recognising for themselves that they decided or agreed to take an addictive substance IN ORDER TO SOLVE WHAT THEY THEMSELVES (and usually them alone) CONSIDERED A PROBLEM OF SURVIVAL IN THEIR DAILY LIFE OR ENVIRONMENT.

In other words: DRUGS ARE A SOLUTION – NOT A PROBLEM.

But strangely enough, most “treatment” forms of addiction rehabilitation, EXCEPT self-help, basically consider drugs as “a problem” which doctors believe can only be solved with some form of medication.

A solution is simply an action adopted by individuals to handle some problematic situation in their life.

Those readers with the benefit of self-help training will know that a solution comes under the heading of “a self-determined change”. i.e. It is not something forced on the individual.

So the second difference is that self-help training recognises that the initial cause of addiction is not a search for thrills, or highs, or misuse, or abuse, but that the cause is the desire of an individual to solve what he or she considers a worrying personal problem by employing a solution which he or she is wrongly advised or led to believe involves using an addictive substance.

So they are a VICTIM of both the addictive drug and the misleading information given them in order to persuade them to try a few doses.

In other words, they make a disastrous decision to use an addictive substance based on a lie or on some misunderstanding, and become addicted because it is addictive drugs themselves which are what impose and enforce addiction on the user.

This is obvious, because NO-ONE CAN EVER BECOME ADDICTED TO A DRUG WHICH ONE NEVER EVER USES !

THIRD Difference: From the above we see that the goals of self-help training are:
1) knowledge of recovery techniques,
2) resurrection of personal responsibility, and
3) the regaining of relaxed control of one's life - leading to self-determination
    of one's life.

But for other addiction rehabilitation systems the goal is often to be able to struggle through each difficult day - one day at a time - without taking the drug to which they are addicted, just by courageously fighting their craving.

Whilst this can eventually bravely lead some to increasingly relaxed abstinence, because other rehab systems make no attempt to remove the individual's store of drug toxins and metabolites lodged in the fatty tissues of the body, there is always the possibility of re-stimulation from the breakdown of such deposits, their release into the blood stream, a consequent re-triggering of desire for the drug, and a return to addiction. Release of such addictive deposits is triggered by increases in body temperature usually caused by physical work, exercise and / or weather hot enough to lead to sweating.

Which brings us to an examination of the technicalities and nomenclature involved in recovery from addiction.

FOURTH Difference: When self-help training says: “detoxification”, we mean flushing from the addict's body ALL drug residues, metabolites, hormones and other toxic deposits built up by addiction and life in general.

When a psychiatrist, doctor or pharmacists says: “detoxification”, they misleadingly mean the stopping of the regular taking of any further doses of a particular addictive substance. (What self-help regards as: “withdrawal”.)
 
So, when an addict is given medication to stop him taking heroin, that is the psycho-pharm idea of a “heroin detox”. The addict is no longer adding to the store of toxic heroin metabolites in his body, but nevertheless he still retains whatever damagingly poisonous store of them he has already built-up.

However, IF in order to stop the heroin intake he is prescribed methadone or Subutex, etc., (which is normally the case), IN ADDITION TO his existing store of heroin metabolites, he then starts to build up a further store of methadone metabolites or Subutex metabolites, etc., any or all of which (including the original heroin) – by engaging in hard physical work, energetic sport or just warmer than normal summer weather conditions – can by sweating be released from the body's fatty tissues, re-enter the bloodstream and lead to a return to a former state of addictive desire.

“Recovered” and “rehabilitated” are other words which for self-help trainees have different meanings from those which other addiction rehabilitation systems assign them.

For us: “recovered” means returning to the natural state of lasting relaxed abstinence into which 99% of the population is born. To fully understand why this is different – try ringing a local rehab and asking what THEY mean by “recovered” ! Or ring your local MP and ask what he or she (mis)understands by “recovered”.

Self-help training goals (and achievements) are seen by many as sky-high when compared to the goals of most other rehabs.

FURTHER Differences:

Because of the fundamentally basic differences between the self-help “TRAINING” approach and psycho-pharm “TREATMENT” approaches the reasons why self-help is totally different becomes apparent in every aspect of an addict's journey through his or her programme.

Self-help training “withdrawal” procedures are DRUG-FREE. Many other withdrawals are not. In LASTING RELAXED ABSTINENCE terms self-help programme results run at a 55 to 69+% success rate, normally reached in 11 to 13 weeks.
 
Methadone achieves only 3% abstinence after decades of prescribed usage. Twelve Steps does better at 20 to 30% achieved in 9 to 36 months or longer.

And even the cost of delivering self-help training residential recovery is different from other residential rehabilitation operations, because of our willingness and ability to offer the choice of “Payment by Results” as an alternative to the usual full up-front fee for attendance on course rather than for an agreed result.

Depending on local property and wages costs, which can vary from one part of the UK to another, the current self-help programme fee for the newest Centre in the expensive south of London counties is £29,000 on a Payment by Results basis. But other residential rehabs cost from £12,000 to £39,000 or more, for treatment periods far shorter than self-helps 12 weeks and with full payment due irrespective of the result.

And of course results of 20 to 30% abstinence are nowhere near as valuable as the self-help training results of 55 to 69+% of lasting relaxed abstinence and recovery – first time through the programme.

There is also another important difference.

Psycho-pharm treatment prescribing considers ALL addicts as nearly impossible to cure, as a result of which they say they should ALL be put on Subutex or methadone Opioid Substitution Therapy (OST).

On the other hand, self-help training centres know from 50 years experience of training addicts to cure themselves, that 70 to 75% of addicts who have been using for months or years WANT TO QUIT, have tried at numerous times (often daily) to do so and yet, having again failed, STILL WANT TO STOP.

THEIR PROBLEM IS THEREFORE NOT WILLINGNESS,
IT IS LACK OF RECOVERY KNOW-HOW.

The other 25 to 30% are resistive cases who for the three well known main reasons have no desire or intention whatsoever to quit. These are the horses you can lead to water, but who will not drink. So, with no willingness, how can they ever be trained ?

The other 70 to 75% of addicts need, want AND DESERVE Self-Help Training Technology. And the rest of the society also needs them to have it, because addicts are the 5% of the UK population which impinge most heavily on the lives of the other 95%.

It is therefore encouraging to observe that internationally more citizens and a majority of policy-makers are now recognising the direction in which addiction inevitably takes our families and society, and have seen that the most important first step is to REDUCE THE DEMAND which can arise from within a family from vested interest and criminal advice leading to poor parenting.

Westminster, Brussels, Edinburgh, Belfast, Dublin, Cardiff and other parliaments are now increasingly aware that amongst the problems which drug and alcohol addicts cause are the following:

* Addicts and drunks cause most accidents at work.
* Addicts mug and rob old people.
* Addicts and drunks cause most road accidents.
* Addicts sell drugs to children (and others).
* Addict increase the numbers of prostitutes and toy boys
    in our towns and cities.
* Addicts disrupt our schools, the education of our children
    and the life of our communities.
* Addicts bankrupt businesses and destroy jobs.
* Addicts break into and burgle people's homes.
* Addicts spread HIV, AIDS and hepatitis.
* Addicts and drunks commit the most crimes,
and,
ADDICTS ARE UNDOUBTEDLY THE REAL CURRENT THREAT TO
OUR LIVES AND TO EVERYBODY'S FUTURE.
AND THIS INCLUDES ADDICTS ON ILLEGAL, LICENSED
AND PRESCRIBED DRUGS.

This is because their addiction controls them, and
THIS AFFECTS EVERYBODY – EVERYONE'S FAMILY, EVERYONE'S
INCOME, EVERY JOB, EVERYONE'S HEALTH AND EVERY ONE'S
HOME – INCLUDING YOURS.
The above is about addicts in general and the increasing damage which they do to all walks of society and to our whole economy.

They are also the reasons why (although we might believe it is not our fault or our problem) WE MUST ALL DO OUR UTMOST TO POSITIVELY HELP ADDICTS reduce their numbers and their dependency on those of us who do not use drugs.

Because we have the truth staring us in the face, we can be sure it is no use relying on government alone to solve the substance addiction problems which are daily causing anxiety, crime, violence, terrorism, damage, accidents, injuries, disease and even death.

Every one of us is needed to solve this problem because, in the final analysis, it is OUR problem, even if our family and children have so far managed to avoid actual drug usage and the direct results of addictive behaviour.

SO, IT IS SINCERELY HOPED YOU AND YOURS WILL NEVER HAVE
TO DIRECTLY FACE ADDICTION, AND HOPED ALSO THAT YOU WILL RECOGNISE THAT SUCH AN ESCAPE WILL MAINLY COME ABOUT BECAUSE YOU HELPED STAMP OUT ADDICTIVE DRUGS

BY HELPING VICTIMS OF ADDICTION TO RECOVER !

-------------------------------------------------------

For further information, you may wish to contact:
Elisabeth M. Reichert, Field Staff Member
for Narconon United Kingdom,
e-mail elisabeth.3@btinternet.com, or phone 0775 263 0319.

who can arrange for you to inspect (without obligation),
and talk to the staff and students at,
the NARCONON UNITED KINGDOM Training Centre,
at HEATHFIELD, East Sussex, TN21 0DJ.