THE
B.B.C.'S OFTEN DAMAGING
INFLUENCE ON ALL OUR LIVES.
Newspaper and magazine
editors, along with Facebook, Linked-In, Twitter and You-Tube, etc.,
have some influence on many but not all of our lives. And most of
them permit (and even encourage) meaningful input from the general
public.
But
of all the media available to the great British public, the output of
the British Broadcasting Corporation via both Radio and T.V. clearly
has by far the greatest influence, but seldom permits more than a
modicum of input from its listeners and watchers – most often under
rather carefully controlled circumstances.
I personally love and admire
the B.B.C. and most of what it achieves both Radio and T.V-wise, but
am disturbed to find it claiming to be “unbiased” and
“independent” of government and other influences, whilst at the
same time manifesting deeply entrenched and damaging positions on a
few vital subjects.
One
particular subject which screams bias, and even prejudice, is the
field of “mental health”, where psychiatry has been failing us
for nearly two centuries.
Regular
programmes such as: “All In The Mind” still peddle the ancient
ideas of well over a century
ago, based on Wundt 1832,
Pavlov 1849, Freud 1856, Adler 1870 Jung 1875, Ellis and others,
all
of whom have majorly
contributed
to the views and practices of clinical psychology, psycho-therapy and
psychiatry as we know them today – and
as
psychiatrists damagingly still
practise every
day.
It
is interesting however, that more recent giants of psychiatric theory
and practice – such as Emeritus Professor Thomas Szasz, former
holder of the Chair of Psychiatry at New York State University and Dr
Peter Breggin, author of “Toxic Psychiatry” and Chairman of Wales
‘MIND’, have together with many other enlightened and
internationally revered psychiatrists, spent a major part of their
professional lives condemning the status-quo psychiatry of Wundt,
Pavlov and Freud, etc., as being not only out-of-date, but also
ineffective and even in fact a downright dangerous threat
to the lives of a majority of mental patients undergoing such
treatments.
However,
even without these expert denunciations, psychiatry’s lack of
successful results have themselves been increasingly condemning
psychiatrists and their work for well over a century, with repeated
treatment failures screaming out for something safe and effective to
take psychiatry’s place.
And
in 1950, with the publishing of the revolutionary book: “DIANETICS:
The Modern Science of Mental Health” (a
true and proper science of the mind,
based on non-damaging, straightforward and basically simple
procedures for handling mental and emotional problems)
was launched, and since then has, in 66 years, become by far the most
widely used and successful mental health study and therapy across the
whole world.
Yet
“psychiatry” and “psychology”, both of which amazingly still
offer no agreed upon definition for “mind”, and of which several
psych schools actually deny the mind's existence, continue to be
“authoritatively” featured by the BBC on a regular basis.
Which
apparently mean that the BBC, which stands on the very crossroads of
the world's news channels, astonishingly evidences no knowledge of
the battle for scientific veracity which has been going on between
psychiatry and Dianetics for the last 66 years !
Instead,
“the BEEB” goes on pushing totally disproven, mainly corrupt,
dangerous and scientifically implausible ancient psychiatry, whilst
on PANORAMA condemning the modern and effective true science of
DIANETICS® and its
originator.
THIS
CAN REALLY MEAN ONLY ONE THING.
Namely,
that at least part of the BBC is riddled with psychologists and
psychiatric “advisors” busily protecting their jobs and their
income and the whole tottering edifice of psychiatry's version of
“mental health” in this country.
In
this endeavour, psychiatrists are backed by the pharmaceutical
purveyors of addictive medication, for whom psychiatry acts as that
industry's main “drug-pushers” by prescribing (and advocating
the prescribing by G.Ps and other doctors) of addictive, and
sometimes also hypnotic, drugs on a palliative basis intended to
temporarily relieve symptoms rather than procuring permanent and
complete cures.
Why
would our really quite Beautiful Broadcasting Corporation lean over
to protect the failing and damaging psychiatric version of “Mental
Health” and descend to lambasting and totally falsely condemning
psychiatry's vastly superior opponent "DIANETICS: The Modern Science of Mental
Health", IF the relevant production and programming departments
were NOT staffed at decision-making level with psych
fifth-columnists bent on their own survival rather than on what is
best for the rest of humanity and the BBC's veracity ?
One
way to go is to remove all programmes promoting psychiatry as well as
all condemnations of L. Ron Hubbard's work. Another way to go would
be to devote as much honest production and programme time to
DIANETICS as is currently assigned to “psychiatry”.
But
the obvious way to go is to do as we all sensibly do with our cars,
fridges, computers and gas boilers, etc.
When
they get too old, too dangerous, too expensive and obviously out of
date, we change them for a newer, safer and more efficient and
effective model.
In
the field of Mental Health that modern model is: DIANETICS –
available in all of the world's major languages and taught and
practised in most of the major towns and cities of the world.
“DIANETICS:
The Modern Science of Mental Health” is also the Number ONE “New York
TIMES” Best-Seller of the last 66 years, and is available from most
high street book-shops, or can be borrowed from your local lending
library. It is also available in audio-book form.
If
you would like further information on Psychiatry, go to the website
of C.C.H.R. (The Citizen's Commission on Human Rights), and for further
honest and accurate information on DIANETICS, you may like to contact
S.A.F.E. for discussion on (01342) 810151, any weekday between
11.00am and 9.00pm.
S.A.F.E.
Is A Not-For-Profit Community Support Group Formed in 1975.
___________________________________________________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment